Literature DB >> 35293166

[Comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail in treatment of Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly].

Wenbin Fan1,2,3, Xueliang Cui1,2,3, Liu Shi1,2,3, Tian Xie1,2,3, Yunfeng Rui1,2,3, Hui Chen1,2,3.   

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of locking plate and intramedullary nail in treatment of Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 elderly patients with Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus met the selection criteria between January 2015 and December 2018. Forty-six patients were treated with locking plate fixation (locking plate group), and 40 patients with intramedullary nail fixation (intramedullary nail group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, fracture side and type, time from injury to operation, and comorbidities between the two groups ( P>0.05). Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, and shoulder range of motion (forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation) were compared between the two groups. X-ray films were taken to assess the fracture healing, and the neck-shaft angle was measured at 2 days after operation and at last follow-up, and the difference between the two time points was calculated.
Results: Patients in both groups were followed up 18-40 months, with an average of 30.4 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups ( t=-0.986, P=0.327). X-ray films reexamination showed that the fractures of two groups healed, and the healing time was (11.3±2.1) weeks in locking plate group and (10.3±2.0) weeks in intramedullary nail group, which had significant difference between the two groups ( t=2.250, P=0.027). The difference of neck-shaft angle was (7.63±7.01)° in locking plate group and (2.85±2.82)° in intramedullary nail group, which had significant difference between the two groups ( t=4.032, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in Constant-Murley score, ASES score, VAS score, and shoulder range of motion between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). Complications occurred in 13 cases (28.3%) of locking plate group and in 4 cases (10.0%) of intramedullary nail group, and the difference between the two groups was significant ( χ 2=4.498, P=0.034).
Conclusion: Both locking plates and intramedullary nails can be used for the treatment of Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. The intramedullary nail fixation surgery is more minimally invasive, which has fewer postoperative complications and faster fracture healing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Proximal humeral fracture; internal fixation; intramedullary nail; locking plate; the elderly

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35293166      PMCID: PMC8923928          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  13 in total

Review 1.  Management of malunion of the proximal humerus: current concepts.

Authors:  Daphne Pinkas; Tony S Wanich; Anthony A DePalma; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Open Reduction and Long Locking Plate Fixation of Complex Proximal Humeral Metadiaphyseal Fractures.

Authors:  C Michael Robinson; Paul H C Stirling; Deborah J MacDonald; Jason A Strelzow; Ewan B Goudie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  [Treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with intramedullary nail and locking plate].

Authors:  G Li; W F Wei; X Liu; T Yang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 4.  Postoperative outcomes of initial varus versus initial valgus proximal humerus fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mallikarjun Honnenahalli Chandrappa; Shahin Hajibandeh; Shahab Hajibandeh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Nicola Bizzotto; Stephan Riedmann; Christian Kammerlander; Clemens Hengg; Franz Sebastian Kralinger
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Yoram Weil; Joseph U Barker; Bryan T Kelly; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation.

Authors:  Churl-Woo Lee; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  A comprehensive update on current fixation options for two-part proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  Richard S Yoon; Daniel Dziadosz; David A Porter; Matthew A Frank; Wade R Smith; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail.

Authors:  Greta Lorenz; Wolfgang Schönthaler; Wolfgang Huf; Micha Komjati; Christian Fialka; Sandra Boesmueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the positioning of calcar screw when treating proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate.

Authors:  Qiuke Wang; Ning Sheng; Biyu Rui; Yunfeng Chen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.