Literature DB >> 35292148

Effect on Morbidity and Mortality of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With COVID-19.

Ahmad A Toubasi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35292148      PMCID: PMC8917387          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


× No keyword cloud information.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of cases and deaths, resulting in a public health emergency. It is well established that 1 of the complications of infections in critically ill patients is disseminated intravascular coagulation. This complication is driven by the activation of multiple systemic coagulation and inflammatory responses. From the beginning of the pandemic, early reports from Wuhan showed that patients with COVID-19 experienced abnormal coagulation, demonstrated by abnormal prothrombin time and partial thrombin time and elevated d-dimer. Furthermore, several studies showed that patients with COVID-19 with high d-dimer had worse outcomes and severe clinical courses. Presently, venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is recommended for all patients with COVID-19 who are admitted to the hospital. Consequently, it was very important to establish whether oral preparation of VTE prophylaxis can prevent severe and fatal COVID-19 outcomes among patients with COVID-19. The following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and medRxiv were searched up to September 16 2021, using “COVID-19” and “oral anticoagulation” and their related medical subject headings terms. Studies were included if they were cohort or case control in design, included patients with COVID-19, compared between patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) before COVID-19 diagnosis and control group in terms of COVID-19 severity and mortality, and adjusted for confounding variables. The exposure of interest was the use of DOACs before COVID-19 infection regardless of the type of the used DOACs and the outcome of interest was COVID-19 severity and mortality. COVID-19 mortality was defined as death and COVID-19 severity was defined as mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and its related 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were pooled using the random effects model using Meta XL, version 5.3 (EpiGear International, Queensland, Australia). Cochran Q heterogeneity test and I2 statistic were performed to estimate the heterogeneity. The search yielded 3,474 articles; after deduplication and applying the inclusion criteria, 5 articles3, 4, 5, 6 were included in the data extraction (Figure 1 ). The total number of patients with COVID-19 in the included articles was 148,027. Of them, 70.5% (104,429/148,031) were previous DOAC users and the rest were controls. The quality of all of the included studies was good (9/9). Furthermore, 0.4% (400/104,429) of patients taking DOAC developed severe or fatal COVID-19 infection. In comparison, 4.9% (2,126/43,602) of controls developed severe or fatal COVID-19 infection. The analysis of the HRs showed that DOAC use was significantly associated with reduced risk of COVID-19 severity and mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84; Figure 2 ) and the heterogeneity of this model was insignificant (I2 = 0%, p = 0.52). In the OR model, DOAC use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 severity and mortality (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.76; Figure 3 ) and the heterogeneity of this model was insignificant (I2 = 0%, p = 0.69). Our analysis models revealed that patients who used DOACs before COVID-19 infection had a significant reduction by 50% and 31% in the risk of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death because of COVID-19. This result was similar across all of the included studies except 1. It was well established that COVID-19 increases the risk for both arterial and venous thrombosis. Several studies showed that patients in the ICU with COVID-19 had higher incidence of VTE compared with matched patients in the ICU who were COVID-19-negative. Similarly, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome because of COVID-19 experienced more VTE than their counterparts who had acute respiratory distress syndrome but were COVID-19 negative. Consequently, it was important to conduct studies that assess the benefits and risks of the use of anticoagulants. A large cohort study showed that patients with COVID-19 who received prophylactic anticoagulants had lower 30-day mortality with no increase in the risk for bleeding compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic anticoagulants. In contrast, the ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions) trial did not support using anticoagulants agents in treating nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19. Yet, the trial did not recruit patients with elevated risk for thromboembolic events or deaths and therefore was underpowered to assess the effect of anticoagulants on patients with COVID-19. This indicates that using anticoagulants among patients with COVID-19 should be considered according to the clinical picture. Accordingly, the relative impact of anticoagulants could be enhanced using the CHADS score which is a nonspecific tool but shown to be prognostic in patients with COVID-19. Because our meta-analysis included data from a large number of patients with COVID-19 who use DOACs, taken from 5 studies, and all of them were adjusted extensively for multiple potential confounding factors—the findings can be considered reliable. Our findings suggest a reduction in COVID-19 mortality and severity among patients with COVID-19 with previous use of DOACs. This supports the evidence that VTE is a very important prognostic factor among patients with COVID-19. Also, this substantiates the benefits of DOAC use in improving the outcomes of several diseases. However, much is left to be determined about which dose of DOAC is the most beneficial and when to start the therapy among patients with COVID-19. This necessitates the need for more data from well-designed prospective studies and clinical trials to support our results.
Figure 1

Flow chart

Figure 2

Hazard Ratio for the Association between DOACS use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality.

Figure 3

Odds Ratio for the Association between DOACS use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality.

Flow chart Hazard Ratio for the Association between DOACS use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality. Odds Ratio for the Association between DOACS use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality.

Funding

None.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
  1 in total

1.  Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for patients with atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Chia Siang Kow; Dinesh Sangarran Ramachandram; Syed Shahzad Hasan
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.200

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.