| Literature DB >> 35291680 |
Anusha Raghavan1, Aparna Sukumaran1, Madan Kumar Parangimalai Diwakar2.
Abstract
Statement of the Problem: Despite topical fluoride being used for over 50 years in caries prevention, its complete potential in terms of formation of fluorapatite enamel and prolonged surface retention has not been harnessed. Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of nanoparticle based acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel on surface enamel fluoride uptake through split mouth design over a period of six months, on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment and indicated for bilateral extraction of premolars on at least one of the arch. Materials and Method: A split mouth non randomized clinical trial was performed. Each of the 30 participants received one application of 4 minutes duration of both the intervention: Right half of the mouth received nanoparticle based APF gel, and left half of the mouth received conventional APF gel (16 Oz Pascal Corp.; strawberry flavor). Bilateral acid etch biopsy of enamel surface was take at 3 intervals- baseline,24 hours and 30 days. Using 1ml of 0.5M perchloric acid, acid etch enamel biopsy was taken for all the study subjects at 3 intervals of time (baseline, 24 hours and 30 days), bilaterally on the buccal and palatal/lingual surface of maxillary or mandibular premolars indicated for extraction, using 1 (l of 0.5M perchloric acid. After the premolars were extracted, scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was done to determine the surface characteristics of enamel in both groups.Entities:
Keywords: APF gel; Biopsy; Enamel fluoride; Nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35291680 PMCID: PMC8918642 DOI: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87895.1295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent (Shiraz) ISSN: 2345-6418
Figure 1a: Preparation of nanoparticle based gel, b: The schematic representation of the enamel biopsy procedure, c: The clinical photograph of how the biopsy was performed at baseline, 24 hours and 30 days, d: The application of gels in their respective sites and analysis.
Figure 2Flowchart illustrating the methodology of the study
Generalized estimating equation with fluoride uptake as independent variable controlling for group, time and simultaneously for group and time
| Parameter | B | Std. Error | 95% Wald CI | Hypothesis Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Wald Chi-Square | df | ||||
| Group | 1874.929 | 144.6119 | 1591.495 | 2158.363 | 168.098 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Time | 117.174 | 20.7108 | 76.582 | 157.767 | 32.009 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Group * Time | -89.124 | 12.5363 | -113.695 | -64.554 | 50.542 | 1 | <0.001 |
| (Scale) | 5498595.4 | ||||||
Dependent Variable: Fluoride uptake
Model: Group, Time, Group * Time
p< 0.05 indicates significance
Generalized estimating equation with depth of biopsy as independent variable controlling for group, time and simultaneously for group and time
| Parameter | B | Std. Error | 95% Wald CI | Hypothesis Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Wald Chi-Square | df | ||||
| Group | 42.405 | 1.4835 | 39.497 | 45.312 | 817.039 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Time | 2.495 | .0313 | 2.434 | 2.556 | 6372.593 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Group * Time | -1.509 | .0569 | -1.621 | -1.397 | 702.610 | 1 | <0.001 |
| (Scale) | 313.365 | ||||||
Dependent Variable: Biopsy depth
Model: Group, Time, Group * Time
p<0.05 indicates significance
Mean difference in Fluoride uptake between nanoparticle based acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and conventional acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (both between the groups and within group comparison)
| Time of Testing | Nano-Based Gel (n=30) | Conventional APF GEL (n=30) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASELINE | 1487.69±826.8 | 1509.39±844.83§,∞ | 0.920 |
| AT 24 hrs | 5495.25±2171.12 | 4317.86±2294.33 | 0.046 |
| After 30 days | 2492.64 ± 1491.49 | 1944.25 ± 1087.67 | 0.109 |
p value <0.05 indicates significance
indicates pair wise comparison within nano-based APF gel group at baseline, 24hrs and 30 days with significance at the level of p< 0.001
indicates pair wise comparison within conventional APF gel group at baseline, 24hrs and 30 days with significance at the level of p< 0.01
Mean difference in the depth of enamel biopsy between nanoparticle based acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and conventional acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (both between the groups and within group comparison)
| Time of Testing | Nano-Based Gel (n=30) | Conventional APF Gel (n=30) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASELINE | 71.15 ± 3.18 | 70.92 ± 2.95 | 0.767 |
| AT 24 hrs | 70.18 ± 2.92 | 70.31 ± 2.93 | 0.858 |
| After 30 days | 69.33 ± 2.11 | 70.45 ± 2.15 | 0.046 |
p value <0.05 indicates significance
indicates pair wise comparison within nano-based APF gel group at baseline, 24hrs and 30 days with significance at p= 0.00,0.027 and 0.00 respectively
indicates comparison of conventional APF gel group at baseline and 24 hours significance at the level of p= 0.002
Figure 3Scanning electron microscope images of tooth surface from nanoparticle based acidulated phosphate fluoride gel group at 500x, 1000x, 2000x and 5000x magnifications
Figure 4Scanning electron microscope images of tooth surface from conventional based acidulated phosphate fluoride gel group at 500x, 1000x, 2000x and 5000x magnifications
Figure 5Longitudinal section of tooth sample from nanoparticle based and conventional acidulated phosphate fluoride gel group