Literature DB >> 35291455

Energizing scholarly activity in a regional medical campus.

Amanda Bell1, Ekta Khemani1, Seddiq Weera1, Chris Henderson1, Larry W Chambers1.   

Abstract

Medical education is increasingly delivered at distributed sites away from Academic Health Sciences Centres. The Council of Ontario Faculties of Medicine recommends schools develop resources and metrics to foster regional campus scholarly activity. Opportunities for distributed program trainees must support learning core skills in research and critical appraisal to comply with medical school accreditation standards and to develop their interests and skills in scholarly work for their future medical careers. We describe a scholarly activity program that is a template for distributed campuses or regional teaching sites seeking to increase learner and faculty engagement and research productivity.
© 2022 Bell, Khemani, Weera, Henderson, Chambers; licensee Synergies Partners.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35291455      PMCID: PMC8909830          DOI: 10.36834/cmej.72593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Educ J        ISSN: 1923-1202


Introduction

Outside academic centres, there are fewer academic faculty and substantial barriers to research participation.[1] Academic faculty and research programs outside tertiary centres address population health needs and increases training opportunities.[2] Distributed medical learners should not be disadvantaged relative to Academic Health Sciences Centre (AHSC) learners.[3] Community-based research addresses social accountability, giving meaning to students and communities.[4] The Niagara Regional Campus (NRC) has over 420 faculty with 7% having formal research training, and 84 medical students seeking to increase their skills and improve their residency applications[5] by participating in projects at their home campus. Students believed research opportunities were only available at the AHSC campus and they could not be successful locally in research. Clinical faculty did not see themselves as researchers and struggled to include scholarly activity in their work. Consequently, research supervision was disproportionately carried out by few faculty. The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board exempted this work from ethics review.

Description of innovation

Through discussion with other regional medical campuses, a local strategic planning process, and problem solving, NRC developed a successful scholarly activity program over a three-year period with minimal external funding. Our initiative was guided by five pillars: engagement, investment, education, tracking and celebration. of students and faculty enabled project development in areas of interest. Engagement included membership on committees and communities of practice, connecting with research programs in postsecondary institutions and healthcare organizations and connecting mentors and mentees. included a small leadership team who assisted in project design, implementation, and output. Research awards from local funders assist students and faculty with research costs. Collaboration with data analysts in the hospital system’s Decision Support Unit, epidemiologists at the Local Health Integration Network, statisticians, and qualitative methodologists from partner universities increased access to datasets and expertise. increased student and faculty skills through multiple channels, including an evidence-based medicine primer, research-in-progress rounds, and journal clubs. Training opportunities are tailored to participant-identified needs. of projects, progress, and opportunities happened through a Scholarly Activity Database maintained by a research coordinator who monitored progress to identify and address barriers and ensured project completion. of achievements happened through newsletters, social and mainstream media. Communities of practice supported new faculty as community-based researchers. Student participation in projects empowered them to enter practice equipped to continue their scholarly pursuits.

Outcomes

Since 2019, 24 peer-reviewed manuscripts co-authored by students were published. First-year MD-student participation was 25% in 2018 and 100% from 2019 to 2021 with increasing number of projects and faculty supervisors (Figure 1). The 2021 graduating class created an NRC Research Compendium[6] to encourage future students to pursue scholarly activities.
Figure 1

Impact – Niagara Regional Campus MD student scholarly activity 2018-2021

Impact – Niagara Regional Campus MD student scholarly activity 2018-2021

Next steps

The NRC will grow scholarly activity with a focus on community-based research through an endowed professorship in family medicine and increased research opportunities for community-based clinicians. We aim to expand engagement with partner organizations targeting improved access to healthcare for marginalized populations. Other regional campuses and community training sites can similarly build their scholarly activity impact and output through using these five pillars. Leveraging existing funds and expertise and dedicating modest leadership to structure a program while tracking and supporting ongoing work should lead to growth and success for students and faculty.
  4 in total

1.  Scholarly activity as a selection criterion in the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS): A review of published criteria by internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics programs.

Authors:  Jorin Lukings; Amanda Bell; Karl Stobbe; Vesa Basha; Jessie Brazier; Delia Dragomir; Meghan Glibbery; Hannah Kearney; Alison Knapp; Daniel Levin; Dyon Tucker; Seddiq Weera; Larry W Chambers
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-07-15

2.  Comprehensiveness of distributed medical education systems: a regional population-based perspective.

Authors:  Andrea M Burrows; Kevin B Laupland
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Distributed medical education in Canada.

Authors:  Rachel Ellaway; Joanna Bates
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  Enhancing Indigenous health research capacity in northern Ontario through distributed community engaged medical education at NOSM: A qualitative evaluation of the community engagement through research pilot program.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Lisa Boesch; Sheldon Tobe
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2018-03-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.