Literature DB >> 35289356

Improve consensus partitioning via a hierarchical procedure.

Zuguang Gu1, Daniel Hübschmann2.   

Abstract

Consensus partitioning is an unsupervised method widely used in high-throughput data analysis for revealing subgroups and assigning stability for the classification. However, standard consensus partitioning procedures are weak for identifying large numbers of stable subgroups. There are two major issues. First, subgroups with small differences are difficult to be separated if they are simultaneously detected with subgroups with large differences. Second, stability of classification generally decreases as the number of subgroups increases. In this work, we proposed a new strategy to solve these two issues by applying consensus partitioning in a hierarchical procedure. We demonstrated hierarchical consensus partitioning can be efficient to reveal more meaningful subgroups. We also tested the performance of hierarchical consensus partitioning on revealing a great number of subgroups with a large deoxyribonucleic acid methylation dataset. The hierarchical consensus partitioning is implemented in the R package cola with comprehensive functionalities for analysis and visualization. It can also automate the analysis only with a minimum of two lines of code, which generates a detailed HTML report containing the complete analysis. The cola package is available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/cola/.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioconductor; R package; consensus partitioning; hierarchical method; unsupervised classification

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35289356      PMCID: PMC9116221          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   13.994


  15 in total

1.  Comparative Molecular Analysis of Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Nilay S Sethi; Toshinori Hinoue; Barbara G Schneider; Andrew D Cherniack; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Jose A Seoane; Farshad Farshidfar; Reanne Bowlby; Mirazul Islam; Jaegil Kim; Walid Chatila; Rehan Akbani; Rupa S Kanchi; Charles S Rabkin; Joseph E Willis; Kenneth K Wang; Shannon J McCall; Lopa Mishra; Akinyemi I Ojesina; Susan Bullman; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Alexander J Lazar; Ryo Sakai; Vésteinn Thorsson; Adam J Bass; Peter W Laird
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1.

Authors:  Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D Wilkerson; C Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd Golub; Jill P Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; J Graeme Hodgson; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T Spellman; Richard K Wilson; Terence P Speed; Joe W Gray; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  How many molecular subtypes? Implications of the unique tumor principle in personalized medicine.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking.

Authors:  Matthew D Wilkerson; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection.

Authors:  Arthur Liberzon; Chet Birger; Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; Mahmoud Ghandi; Jill P Mesirov; Pablo Tamayo
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data.

Authors:  Rahul Satija; Jeffrey A Farrell; David Gennert; Alexander F Schier; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Critical limitations of consensus clustering in class discovery.

Authors:  Yasin Șenbabaoğlu; George Michailidis; Jun Z Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  SC3: consensus clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Vladimir Yu Kiselev; Kristina Kirschner; Michael T Schaub; Tallulah Andrews; Andrew Yiu; Tamir Chandra; Kedar N Natarajan; Wolf Reik; Mauricio Barahona; Anthony R Green; Martin Hemberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Multiresolution Consensus Clustering in Networks.

Authors:  Lucas G S Jeub; Olaf Sporns; Santo Fortunato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage.

Authors:  Dvir Aran; Agnieszka P Looney; Leqian Liu; Esther Wu; Valerie Fong; Austin Hsu; Suzanna Chak; Ram P Naikawadi; Paul J Wolters; Adam R Abate; Atul J Butte; Mallar Bhattacharya
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 25.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.