| Literature DB >> 35289103 |
Hsinhan Tsai1,2, Hsin-Hsiang Huang3,4, John Watt1, Cheng-Hung Hou5, Joseph Strzalka6, Jing-Jong Shyue5, Leeyih Wang3,7, Wanyi Nie1.
Abstract
All inorganic cesium lead trihalide nanocrystals are promising light emitters for bright light emitting diodes (LEDs). Here, CsPb(BrCl)1.5 nanocrystals in metal-organic frameworks (MOF) thin films are demonstrated to achieve bright and stable blue LEDs. The lead metal nodes in the MOF thin film react with Cs-halide salts, resulting in 10-20 nm nanocrystals. This is revealed by X-ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy. Employing the CsPbX3 -MOF thin films as emission layers, bright deep blue and sky-blue LEDs are demonstrated that emit at 452 and 476 nm respectively. The maximum external quantum efficiencies of these devices are 0.72% for deep blue LEDs and 5.6% for sky blue LEDs. More importantly, the device can maintain 50% of its original electroluminescence (T50 ) for 2.23 h when driving at 4.2 V. Detailed optical spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy suggest that the ion migration can be suppressed that maintains the emission brightness and spectra. The study provides a new route for fabricating stable blue light emitting diodes with all-inorganic perovskite nanocrystals.Entities:
Keywords: blue light emitting diodes (LEDs); inorganic perovskite nanocrystals; metal-organic frameworks
Year: 2022 PMID: 35289103 PMCID: PMC9108663 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 17.521
Figure 1a) Schematic illustration of the PeMOF fabrication process and b) the obtained thin films under UV lamp illumination. GIWAXS maps comparison for c) Pb‐MOF and d) Cs‐PeMOF. e) Line‐cut profile extracted from (d) and compared with the simulated XRD patterns for CsPbBr3 and CsPbCl3 structures. f) Transmission electron micrograph of the Cs‐PeMOF thin film and g,h) zoomed‐in view of a nanocrystal.
Figure 2Thin film morphology and emission property characterizations. a) Surface and cross‐sectional SEM images of PeMOF thin film. b) Absorption and PL spectra for PeMOF with 33.3% Br and 50% Br in the precursor. c) AFM characterization (top) and corresponding line‐scan (bottom) of the as‐prepared Cs‐PeMOF. d) Characteristic XPS spectra of Cs, Pb, Br, and Cl elements acquired from the Cs‐PeMOF thin film. e) PL height map and f) peak energy map of a typical CsPb(BrCl)1.5 PeMOF thin film. Scale bars in e and f are 20 µm. g) The peak position distribution extracted from (f).
Figure 3a) Energy alignment of the LED devices (top) and the photo of LEDs using PeMOF as emission layers (bottom). b,c) Electroluminescence spectra probed at various applied bias for deep blue and sky‐blue devices respectively. Current density (J) and luminance (L) as a function of applied voltage (V) for typical d) deep blue LED and e) sky blue LED. f) External quantum efficiency (EQE) for both PeMOF devices as a function of applied voltage. g) photoluminescence intensity comparison for sky‐blue, deep‐blue and green CsPeMOF thin films. Sky‐blue LED device stability study by h) recording the time evolution of the device's L when operated under constant bias, and i) comparing the EL spectra before and after the stability tests under high applied bias.
Figure of merits for LEDs using two Cs‐PeMOF emission layers
| PeMOF layer | Emission wavelength [nm] | FWHM [nm] | PLQY [%] | EQE [%] | Turn on voltage [ | Brightness [cd m−2] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CsPb(BrCl)1.5 | 475 | 20.6 | 54 | 5.67 | 3.5 | 1260 |
| CsPb(Br1Cl2) | 452 | 23.9 | 15 | 0.72 | 3.8 | 202 |
Figure 4Stability investigation by photoluminescence. Time evolution of the PL intensity at 475 nm for a) Cs‐PeMOF emitter and b) bulk CsPb(BrCl)1.5 thin film when excited with different laser powers. c) Normalized PL intensity measured after 250 s of laser excitation for PeMOF and bulk CsPb(BrCl)1.5 thin film. d) The PL spectra before and after stability tests under constant 4 W cm−2 laser irradiation.