| Literature DB >> 35288592 |
Lining Si1, Haiyang Wang2, Yahui Jiang3, Yun Yi3, Rong Wang3, Qifu Long3, Yanli Zhao4.
Abstract
High-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) is a common acute altitude sickness. This study was designed to investigate the effect of MIR17HG polymorphisms on HAPE risk in the Chinese population. The Agena MassARRAY platform was used to genotype six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MIR17HG gene in 244 HAPE patients and 243 non-HAPE controls. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval were used to evaluate the association between each MIR17HG polymorphisms and the risk of HAPE under a polygenetic model. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 test. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) analysis was used to analyze the impacts of SNP-SNP interactions on the risk of HAPE. According to the allele model, the HAPE risk of people with the rs7318578 A allele of MIR17HG was lower than that of people with the C allele (OR 0.74, p = 0.036).Logistic regression analysis of four models for all selected MIR17HG SNPs showed significant differences in the frequencies of rs7318578 (OR 0.74, p = 0.037) and rs17735387 (OR 1.51, p = 0.036) between cases and controls. The results of the sex stratification analysis showed that among males, rs17735387 in the MIR17HG gene is associated with an increased risk of HAPE. MDR analysis showed that the best combination model was a three-locus model incorporating rs72640334, rs7318578, and rs7336610. This study revealed the correlations between rs7318578 and rs17735387 on the MIR17HG gene and the risk of HAPE in the Chinese population, providing a theoretical basis for the early screening, prevention, and diagnosis of HAPE in high-risk populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35288592 PMCID: PMC8921515 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06944-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of participants.
| Variables | Case (244) | Control (243) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age ± SD | 32.41 ± 10.81 | 32.70 ± 9.52 | 0.761 |
| 0.869 | |||
| Female | 19 | 19 | |
| Male | 225 | 224 | |
p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Basic information of six SNPs on the MIR17HG gene in this study.
| SNP | Chromosome | BP | Alleles | Gene | MAF-Case | MAF-Control | HWE- | OR (95% CI) | HaploReg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs75267932 | 13 | 91,351,812 | G/A | 0.125 | 0.115 | 0.75 | 1.10 (0.75–1.62) | 0.639 | Promoter histone marks, Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Motifs changed | |
| rs72640334 | 13 | 91,352,674 | A/C | 0.102 | 0.103 | 0.726 | 1.00 (0.66–1.51) | 0.983 | Enhancer histone marks, DNAse Motifs changed | |
| rs7336610 | 13 | 91,352,883 | C/T | 0.471 | 0.484 | 0.608 | 0.95 (0.74–1.22) | 0.703 | Enhancer histone marks, Proteins bound, Motifs changed, Selected eQTL hits | |
| rs7318578 | 13 | 91,353,215 | A/C | 0.256 | 0.317 | 0.882 | 0.74 (0.56–0.98) | Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Motifs changed, GRASP QTL | ||
| rs17735387 | 13 | 91,353,800 | A/G | 0.199 | 0.16 | 0.229 | 1.30 (0.93–1.80) | 0.12 | Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Proteins bound, Motifs changed | |
| rs1428 | 13 | 91,354,516 | C/A | 0.475 | 0.484 | 0.608 | 0.97 (0.75–1.25) | 0.8 | Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Proteins bound, Motifs changed |
HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, ORs odds ratios, CI confidence interval.
p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Significant values are in bold.
Correlation of MIR17HG SNPs with HAPE risk.
| SNP | Model | Genotype | Number | Crude analysis | adjusted by age and sex | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| rs7318578 | Genotype | AA | 134 | 114 | 1 | 1 | ||
| AC | 95 | 104 | 0.78 (0.53–1.13) | 0.186 | 0.78 (0.54–1.14) | 0.198 | ||
| CC | 15 | 25 | 0.51 (0.26–1.02) | 0.055 | 0.51 (0.26–1.01) | 0.053 | ||
| Dominant | CC/AC + AA | 15/229 | 25/218 | 0.73 (0.51–1.04) | 0.078 | 0.73 (0.51–1.04) | 0.081 | |
| Recessive | CC + AC/AA | 110/134 | 129/114 | 0.57 (0.29–1.11) | 0.1 | 0.57 (0.29–1.10) | 0.094 | |
| Log-additive | – | – | – | 0.74 (0.56–0.98) | 0.037 | 0.74 (0.56–0.98) | ||
| rs17735387 | Genotype | GG | 153 | 174 | 1 | 1 | ||
| AG | 85 | 60 | 1.61 (1.09–2.39) | 0.018 | 1.62 (1.09–2.41) | |||
| AA | 6 | 9 | 0.76 (0.26–2.18) | 0.607 | 0.76 (0.27–2.20) | 0.617 | ||
| Dominant | AA/AG + GG | 6/238 | 91,377/234 | 1.50 (1.03–2.20) | 0.037 | 1.51 (1.03–2.21) | ||
| Recessive | AA + AG/GG | 91/153 | 69/174 | 0.66 (0.23–1.87) | 0.43 | 0.66 (0.23–1.88) | 0.434 | |
| Log-additive | – | – | – | 1.30 (0.93–1.81) | 0.119 | 1.31 (0.94–1.82) | 0.117 | |
SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval.
Significant values are in bold.
Stratification analysis by gender for the effect of MIR17HG SNPs on HAPE risk.
| SNP | Model | Genotype | Male | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | ||||
| rs75267932 | Genotype | AA | 1 | |
| AG | 1.19 (0.76–1.85) | 0.455 | ||
| GG | 1.04 (0.14–7.44) | 0.972 | ||
| Dominant | GG/AG + AA | 1.18 (0.76–1.83) | 0.462 | |
| Recessive | GG + AG/AA | 1.00 (0.14–7.14) | 0.997 | |
| Log-additive | – | 1.16 (0.77–1.75) | 0.488 | |
| rs72640334 | Genotype | CC | 1 | |
| AC | 0.88 (0.55–1.43) | 0.616 | ||
| AA | 1.43 (0.24–8.73) | 0.697 | ||
| Dominant | AA/AC + CC | 0.91 (0.57–1.45) | 0.688 | |
| Recessive | AA + AC/CC | 1.47 (0.24–8.92) | 0.677 | |
| Log-additive | – | 0.94 (0.61–1.45) | 0.790 | |
| rs7336610 | Genotype | TT | 1 | |
| TC | 1.47 (0.94–2.32) | 0.094 | ||
| CC | 0.87 (0.51–1.51) | 0.624 | ||
| Dominant | CC/TC + TT | 1.26 (0.82–1.94) | 0.294 | |
| Recessive | CC + TC/TT | 0.67 (0.43–1.05) | 0.084 | |
| Log-additive | – | 0.95 (0.72–1.24) | 0.697 | |
| rs7318578 | Genotype | AA | 1 | |
| AC | 0.79 (0.53–1.17) | 0.232 | ||
| CC | 0.53 (0.27–1.07) | 0.076 | ||
| Dominant | CC/AC + AA | 0.73 (0.51–1.07) | 0.104 | |
| Recessive | CC + AC/AA | 0.59 (0.3–1.16) | 0.126 | |
| Log-additive | – | 0.75 (0.56–1.01) | 0.055 | |
| rs17735387 | Genotype | GG | 1 | |
| AG | 1.55 (1.03–2.32) | |||
| AA | 0.63 (0.2–1.91) | 0.412 | ||
| Dominant | AA/AG + GG | 1.42 (0.96–2.11) | 0.077 | |
| Recessive | AA + AG/GG | 0.54 (0.18–1.65) | 0.283 | |
| Log-additive | – | 1.23 (0.88–1.73) | 0.233 | |
| rs1428 | Genotype | AA | 1 | |
| AC | 1.4 (0.89–2.2) | 0.147 | ||
| CC | 0.92 (0.53–1.57) | 0.748 | ||
| Dominant | CC/AC + AA | 1.23 (0.8–1.88) | 0.350 | |
| Recessive | CC + AC/AA | 0.73 (0.47–1.14) | 0.168 | |
| Log-additive | – | 0.97 (0.74–1.26) | 0.802 |
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval.
Bold indicated that p < 0.05 meant the data was statistically significant.
Figure 1MDR analysis results. MDR-3.0.2 software: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdr/. Dendogram (A) and Fruchterman Rheingold plot (B) of the interactions of MIR17HG SNPs rs75267932, rs72640334, rs7336610, rs7318578, rs17735387 and rs1428 for HAPE risk. Shorter connections among nodes indicate stronger redundant interactions. Negative percent entropy indicates redundancy.
SNP–SNP interaction models of MIR17HG gene the predisposition of HAPE.
| Model | Testing Bal. Acc. (%) | CVC | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs17735387 | 51.44 | 7/10 | 1.64 (1.11–2.43) | |
| rs7318578,rs7336610 | 53.09 | 9/10 | 2.26 (1.43–3.57) | |
| rs72640334,rs7318578,rs7336610 | 56.58 | 10/10 | 2.43 (1.61–3.68) | |
| rs72640334,rs7318578,rs7336610,rs75267932 | 53.09 | 8/10 | 2.34 (1.58–3.46) | |
| rs1428,rs17735387,rs72640334,rs7318578,rs75267932 | 52.67 | 6/10 | 2.39 (1.61–3.55 | |
| rs1428,rs17735387,rs72640334,rs7318578,rs7336610,rs75267932 | 52.88 | 10/10 | 2.34 (1.57–3.49) |
MDR multifactor dimensionality reduction, Bal. Acc. balanced accuracy, CVC cross-validation consistency.
p values were calculated using χ2 test.
Bold indicated that p < 0.05 means the data is statistically significant.
Figure 2LD plots of six SNPs in the MIR17HG gene. Haploview-4.2 software: https://www.broadinstitute.org/haploview/downloads#JAR. The squares in the graph represent the strength of linkage disequilibrium (r2) between every two SNPs. The darker the color, the greater the r2 value. The inverted black triangles represent haplotype blocks defined by the confidence interval method. Agena MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 software: https://seqpws1.agenabio.com/AssayDesignerSuite.html#design:new=Genotyping. Agena Typer 4.0 software: (Agena, San Diego, CA, USA) https://seqpws1.agenabio.com/AssayDesignerSuite.html#design:new=Genotyping. The Agena Typer 4.0 software for genotyping was purchased from the MassARRAY chip company (Agena, San Diego, CA, USA).
The haplotype analysis result of MIR17HG polymorphisms and their associations with HAPE risk.
| Gene | SNP | Haplotype | Frequency | Without adjusted | Adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPE patients | Control | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| rs7336610|rs7318578|rs17735387|rs1428 | CAAC | 0.803 | 0.844 | 0.76 (0.54–1.05) | 0.099 | 0.75 (0.54–1.05) | 0.098 | |
| rs7336610|rs7318578|rs17735387|rs1428 | CCGC | 0.746 | 0.691 | 1.33 (0.99–1.77) | 0.055 | 1.32 (0.99–1.77) | 0.055 | |
| rs7336610|rs7318578|rs17735387|rs1428 | CAGC | 0.982 | 0.986 | 0.77 (0.28–2.11) | 0.618 | 0.78 (0.28–2.12) | 0.622 | |
| rs7336610|rs7318578|rs17735387|rs1428 | TAGA | 0.518 | 0.512 | 1.03 (0.79–1.33) | 0.846 | 1.03 (0.79–1.33) | 0.85 | |
SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval.
p value was calculated by Wald test with and without adjusted by age and gender. p < 0.05 means the data is statistically significant.