Literature DB >> 35287928

Comparing microscopy and DNA metabarcoding techniques for identifying cyanobacteria assemblages across hundreds of lakes.

Paul W MacKeigan1, Rebecca E Garner2, Marie-Ève Monchamp3, David A Walsh2, Vera E Onana2, Susanne A Kraemer2, Frances R Pick4, Beatrix E Beisner5, Michael D Agbeti6, Naíla Barbosa da Costa7, B Jesse Shapiro8, Irene Gregory-Eaves9.   

Abstract

Accurately identifying the species present in an ecosystem is vital to lake managers and successful bioassessment programs. This is particularly important when monitoring cyanobacteria, as numerous taxa produce toxins and can have major negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Increasingly, DNA-based techniques such as metabarcoding are being used for measuring aquatic biodiversity, as they could accelerate processing time, decrease costs and reduce some of the biases associated with traditional light microscopy. Despite the continuing use of traditional microscopy and the growing use of DNA metabarcoding to identify cyanobacteria assemblages, methodological comparisons between the two approaches have rarely been reported from a wide suite of lake types. Here, we compare planktonic cyanobacteria assemblages generated by inverted light microscopy and DNA metabarcoding from a 379-lake dataset spanning a longitudinal and trophic gradient. We found moderate levels of congruence between methods at the broadest taxonomic levels (i.e., Order, RV=0.40, p < 0.0001). This comparison revealed distinct cyanobacteria communities from lakes of different trophic states, with Microcystis, Aphanizomenon and Dolichospermum dominating with both methods in eutrophic and hypereutrophic sites. This finding supports the use of either method when monitoring eutrophication in lake surface waters. The biggest difference between the two methods was the detection of picocyanobacteria, which are typically underestimated by light microscopy. This reveals that the communities generated by each method currently are complementary as opposed to identical and promotes a combined-method strategy when monitoring a range of trophic systems. For example, microscopy can provide measures of cyanobacteria biomass, which are critical data in managing lakes. Going forward, we believe that molecular genetic methods will be increasingly adopted as reference databases are routinely updated with more representative sequences and will improve as cyanobacteria taxonomy is resolved with the increase in available genetic information.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16s rRNA gene metabarcoding; Cyanobacteria; Freshwater lakes; Microcystis genotypes; Microscopy; Trophic status; eDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35287928     DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harmful Algae        ISSN: 1568-9883            Impact factor:   4.273


  2 in total

1.  Using metabarcoding and droplet digital PCR to investigate drivers of historical shifts in cyanobacteria from six contrasting lakes.

Authors:  Maïlys Picard; Xavier Pochon; Javier Atalah; John K Pearman; Andrew Rees; Jamie D Howarth; Christopher M Moy; Marcus J Vandergoes; Ian Hawes; Samiullah Khan; Susanna A Wood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Protist Diversity and Metabolic Strategy in Freshwater Lakes Are Shaped by Trophic State and Watershed Land Use on a Continental Scale.

Authors:  Rebecca E Garner; Susanne A Kraemer; Vera E Onana; Yannick Huot; Irene Gregory-Eaves; David A Walsh
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.324

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.