David C Steffens1, Kevin J Manning1, Rong Wu2, James J Grady2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The relationships among depression, personality factors, and cognitive decline in the elderly are complex. Depressed elders score higher in neuroticism than nondepressed older individuals. Presence of neuroticism worsens cognitive decline in depressed older adults. Yet little is known about changes in neuroticism among older adults being treated for depression and the impact of these changes on cognitive decline. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Academic Health Center. PARTICIPANTS: We examined 68 participants in the neurobiology of late-life depression (LLD) study to test the hypothesis that older depressed subjects with more improvement in neuroticism would experience less cognitive decline compared with those with less change in neuroticism. MEASUREMENTS: We measured neuroticism using the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised at baseline and 1 year. Study psychiatrists measured depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS). Global cognitive performance was measured using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) battery at baseline and annually over 3 years. Regression models of 1-year change in neuroticism and 3-year change in CERAD included sex, age, race, education, and 1-year change in MADRS score as covariates. RESULTS: We found that among older adults, 1-year change in neuroticism was inversely associated with 3-year change in CERAD total score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the notion of longitudinal stability of measures of personality, especially among older depressed individuals. They highlight the importance of repeated personality assessment, especially of neuroticism, in the management of LLD. Future studies in larger samples followed for longer periods are needed to confirm our results and to extend them to examine both cognitive change and development of dementia.
OBJECTIVES: The relationships among depression, personality factors, and cognitive decline in the elderly are complex. Depressed elders score higher in neuroticism than nondepressed older individuals. Presence of neuroticism worsens cognitive decline in depressed older adults. Yet little is known about changes in neuroticism among older adults being treated for depression and the impact of these changes on cognitive decline. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Academic Health Center. PARTICIPANTS: We examined 68 participants in the neurobiology of late-life depression (LLD) study to test the hypothesis that older depressed subjects with more improvement in neuroticism would experience less cognitive decline compared with those with less change in neuroticism. MEASUREMENTS: We measured neuroticism using the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised at baseline and 1 year. Study psychiatrists measured depression using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS). Global cognitive performance was measured using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) battery at baseline and annually over 3 years. Regression models of 1-year change in neuroticism and 3-year change in CERAD included sex, age, race, education, and 1-year change in MADRS score as covariates. RESULTS: We found that among older adults, 1-year change in neuroticism was inversely associated with 3-year change in CERAD total score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the notion of longitudinal stability of measures of personality, especially among older depressed individuals. They highlight the importance of repeated personality assessment, especially of neuroticism, in the management of LLD. Future studies in larger samples followed for longer periods are needed to confirm our results and to extend them to examine both cognitive change and development of dementia.
Authors: David C Steffens; Kevin J Manning; Rong Wu; James J Grady; Richard H Fortinsky; Howard A Tennen Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Anthony S Zannas; Douglas R McQuoid; Martha E Payne; David C Steffens; James R MacFall; Allison Ashley-Koch; Warren D Taylor Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Richard J Caselli; Blake T Langlais; Amylou C Dueck; Bruce R Henslin; Travis A Johnson; Bryan K Woodruff; Charlene Hoffman-Snyder; Dona E C Locke Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew J Aschenbrenner; Jennifer Petros; Eric McDade; Guoqiao Wang; David A Balota; Tammie Ls Benzinger; Carlos Cruchaga; Alison Goate; Chengjie Xiong; Richard Perrin; Anne M Fagan; Neill Graff-Radford; Bernardino Ghetti; Johannes Levin; Endy Weidinger; Peter Schofield; Susanne Gräber; Jae-Hong Lee; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; John C Morris; Randall Bateman; Jason Hassenstab Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-06-23
Authors: Nili Solomonov; Jihui Lee; Samprit Banerjee; Christoph Flückiger; Dora Kanellopoulos; Faith M Gunning; Jo Anne Sirey; Conor Liston; Patrick J Raue; Thomas D Hull; Patricia A Areán; George S Alexopoulos Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 15.992