| Literature DB >> 35287308 |
Shun Ding1, Tingting Duan1, Zhengyang Xu1, Dongqin Qiu1, Jingren Yan1, Zhonglin Mu1.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex condition brought on for many reasons, and its prevalence is rising gradually around the world. Xanthii Fructus (XF) has been used in the treatment of CRS for decades and is effective. The chemical and pharmacological profiles of XF, on the other hand, are still unknown and need to be clarified. The potential mechanisms of XF in CRS treatment were investigated using a network pharmacology approach in this study. OB and DL were in charge of screening the bioactive components in XF and drug-likeness. TCMSP and PubChem databases were used to identify prospective XF proteins, whereas GeneCards and the DisGeNET database were used to identify potential CRS genes. An interactive network of XF and CRS is built using the STRING database based on common goals identified by the online tool Venny. Cytoscape was used to visualize the topological characteristics of nodes, while the biological function pathways were identified by GO Knowledge Base, KEGG. There were 26 bioactive components and 115 potential targets in XF that bind to CRS or are considered therapeutically relevant. Five significant signaling pathways have been found for CRS by the pathway analysis including the HIF-1 signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. We simultaneously confirmed that the PI3K-Akt pathway promotes the development of CRS. Finally, this study took a holistic approach to the pharmacological actions and molecular mechanisms of XF in the treatment of CRS. TNF, INS, CCL2, CXCL8, IL-10, VEGFA, and IL-6 have all been identified as potential targets for anti-inflammatory and immune-boosting effects. This network pharmacology prediction could be useful in manifesting the molecular mechanisms of the Chinese herbal compound XF for CRS.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35287308 PMCID: PMC8917441 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4473231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Scheme of this study.
26 compounds from XF, along with their predicted OB, DL, and substitute number.
| Mol ID | Molecule name | OB (%) | DL | Substitute number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOL011676 | Carboxyatractyloside | 39.9686979 | 0.47025 | 1 |
| MOL011678 | (3S,8S,9S,10 R,13R,14S,17R)-17-[(1S,4 R)-4-ethyl-1,5-dimethylhexyl]-10,13-dimethyl-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-ol | 36.91390583 | 0.75147 | 2 |
| MOL000131 | EIC | 41.90443602 | 0.14347 | 3 |
| MOL002573 |
| 50.68856541 | 0.10733 | 4 |
| MOL000357 | Sitogluside | 20.63193686 | 0.6241 | 5 |
| MOL003574 |
| 52.57024488 | 0.10394 | 6 |
| MOL000359 | Sitosterol | 36.91390583 | 0.7512 | 7 |
| MOL000471 | Aloe emodin | 83.37963699 | 0.2409 | 8 |
| MOL000472 | Emodin | 24.39832432 | 0.23916 | 9 |
| MOL000675 | Oleic acid | 33.12836481 | 0.14243 | 10 |
| MOL007326 | Cynarin(e) | 31.75850133 | 0.67849 | 11 |
| MOL000011 | (2R,3 R)-3-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-phenyl)-5-methoxy-2-methylol-2,3-dihydropyrano[5,6-h] [1, 4]benzodioxin-9-one | 68.82559903 | 0.66236 | 12 |
| MOL000208 | ()-Aromadendrene | 55.7416731 | 0.10418 | 13 |
| MOL000266 | Beta-cubebene | 32.81330687 | 0.10858 | 14 |
| MOL000358 | Beta-sitosterol | 36.91390583 | 0.75123 | 15 |
| MOL000432 | Linolenic acid | 45.00906591 | 0.14709 | 16 |
| MOL000449 | Stigmasterol | 43.82985158 | 0.75665 | 17 |
| MOL000474 | (-)-Epoxy caryophyllene | 35.93684943 | 0.12925 | 18 |
| MOL000749 | Linoleic | 41.90443602 | 0.14468 | 19 |
| MOL001442 | Phytol | 33.82439209 | 0.13342 | 20 |
| MOL001755 | 24-Ethylcholest-4-en-3-one | 36.08361164 | 0.75703 | 21 |
| MOL002683 | Ligla | 45.00906591 | 0.14562 | 22 |
| MOL005961 | 10,13-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester | 41.93435814 | 0.16825 | 23 |
| MOL007777 | Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside | 21.31817387 | 0.62593 | 24 |
| MOL008647 | Moupinamide | 86.71215907 | 0.26454 | 25 |
| MOL011169 | Peroxyergosterol | 44.39151838 | 0.82 | 26 |
Figure 2Drugs and disease targets are depicted in a Venn diagram.
Figure 3C-G-D network of XF. The inner circle represents the compounds, and the outer circle represents the targets (determine the size of a single circle by the level of degree).
Figure 4Interaction network of common target proteins.
Figure 5MCC algorithm was used to analyze the top 10 hub genes' network of XF for CRS treatment.
Top 10 hub targets' PPI network characteristics.
| Node_name | Degree | Closeness | Betweenness |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | 85 | 98.5 | 449.21539 |
| ALB | 85 | 98.5 | 931.38969 |
| AKT1 | 82 | 97 | 554.8591 |
| TNF | 82 | 97 | 336.94745 |
| INS | 82 | 97 | 793.32966 |
| VEGFA | 79 | 95.5 | 291.65668 |
| MAPK3 | 72 | 92 | 165.21741 |
| IL-10 | 69 | 90.33333 | 122.36172 |
| CXCL8 | 68 | 89.83333 | 141.47683 |
| CCL2 | 66 | 88.66667 | 80.77667 |
Figure 6Evaluation of targets based on the GO. Top 10 of BP, CC, and MF term enrichment.
Analysis of KEGG pathway enrichment using the XF-CRS network (top 20 with count).
| Pathway | Enrichment score | P value | Count | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) | 9.884173094 | 3.08 | 17 | IL-10, JUN, TGFB1, SMAD3, STAT1, IL-13, STAT3, TNF, IL-2, RELA, NFKB1, IL-4, IL-6, IFNG, IL-1B, TLR4, IL-17 A |
| HIF-1 signaling pathway | 3.721318074 | 8.99 | 19 | NOS2, NOS3, EGF, STAT3, PRKCA, IGF1, HIF1A, EGFR, RELA, NFKB1, INS, VEGFA, IL-6, IFNG, BCL2, AKT1, HMOX1, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) | 9.884173094 | 4.18 | 19 | IL-10, JUN, TGFB1, CXCL8, SMAD3, NOS2, TNF, IL-2, RELA, NFKB1, IL-6, MAPK8, IFNG, IL-1B, CCL5, CCL2, AKT1, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Influenza A | 9.884173094 | 3.59 | 21 | PRSS1, JUN, CXCL8, IFNA1, STAT1, PRKCA, PLG, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, ICAM1, IL-6, MAPK8, IFNG, IL-1B, CCL5, CCL2, AKT1, NLRP3, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Leishmaniasis | 9.884173094 | 9.03 | 15 | IL-10, JUN, TGFB1, ITGAM, NOS2, STAT1, PTGS2, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, IL-4, IFNG, IL-1B, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Amoebiasis | 9.884173094 | 1.47 | 17 | IL-10, ARG2, TGFB1, ITGAM, CXCL8, CSF2, NOS2, HSPB1, PRKCA, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, IL-6, IFNG, IL-1B, CASP3, TLR4 |
| TNF signaling pathway | 9.884173094 | 1.71 | 17 | JUN, VCAM1, CSF2, PTGS2, TNF, MMP9, RELA, NFKB1, ICAM1, IL-6, MAPK8, IL-1B, CASP3, CCL5, CCL2, AKT1, MAPK3 |
| Pertussis | 9.884173094 | 2.01 | 15 | IL-10, JUN, ITGAM, CXCL8, NOS2, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, IL-6, MAPK8, IL-1B, CASP3, NLRP3, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Toxoplasmosis | 9.884173094 | 2.66 | 17 | IL-10, TGFB1, NOS2, STAT1, STAT3, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, MAPK8, CD40LG, IFNG, CASP3, ALOX5, BCL2, AKT1, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Tuberculosis | 9.884173094 | 5.19 | 20 | IL-10, TGFB1, ITGAM, NOS2, IFNA1, STAT1, SRC, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, IL-6, MAPK8, IFNG, IL-1B, CASP3, BCL2, BAX, AKT1, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Toll-like receptor signaling pathway | 9.884173094 | 2.62 | 15 | JUN, CXCL8, IFNA1, STAT1, CD80, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, IL-6, MAPK8, IL-1B, CCL5, AKT1, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| NOD-like receptor signaling pathway | 9.884173094 | 3.03 | 12 | IL-6, HSP90AA1, MAPK8, CXCL8, CCL5, IL-1B, NLRP3, CCL2, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, MAPK3 |
| Pancreatic cancer | 3.592461238 | 1.64 | 12 | MAPK8, TGFB1, SMAD3, STAT1, EGF, STAT3, AKT1, RELA, EGFR, NFKB1, MAPK3, VEGFA |
|
| 9.884173094 | 2.38 | 12 | IL-6, JUN, MAPK8, CXCL8, CSF2, IFNG, NOS2, IL-1B, TLR4, RELA, NFKB1, MAPK3 |
| Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) | 9.884173094 | 2.87 | 15 | XBP1, JUN, TGFB1, CXCL8, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, INS, ERN1, IL-6, MAPK8, IL-1B, CASP3, BAX, AKT1 |
| Legionellosis | 9.884173094 | 6.24 | 10 | IL-6, VCP, ITGAM, CXCL8, IL-1B, CASP3, TNF, TLR4, RELA, NFKB1 |
| PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 3.721318074 | 7.90 | 21 | CSF3, HSP90AA1, IFNA1, NOS3, EGF, PRKCA, IGF1, EGFR, IL-2, RELA, NFKB1, INS, VEGFA, IL-4, IL-3, FGF7, IL-6, BCL2, AKT1, TLR4, MAPK3 |
| Osteoclast differentiation | 3.592461238 | 3.47 | 13 | JUN, TGFB1, STAT1, TNF, RELA, NFKB1, MAPK8, IFNG, IL-1B, BTK, AKT1, PPARG, MAPK3 |
| Prostate cancer | 3.721318074 | 4.72 | 11 | HSP90AA1, EGF, BCL2, CTNNB1, AKT1, IGF1, RELA, EGFR, NFKB1, MAPK3, INS |
| Hepatitis C | 3.592461238 | 3.05 | 12 | MAPK8, CXCL8, IFNA1, STAT1, EGF, STAT3, AKT1, TNF, RELA, EGFR, NFKB1, MAPK3 |
Figure 7HIF-1 signaling pathway. The red rectangle represents the Hub genes, and the green represents the predicted target genes.
Figure 8TNF signaling pathway. The red rectangle represents the Hub genes, and the green represents the predicted target genes.
Figure 9NOD-like receptor signaling pathway. The red rectangle represents the Hub genes, and the green represents the predicted target genes.
Figure 10PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. The red rectangle represents the Hub genes, and the green represents the predicted target genes.
Figure 11Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. The red rectangle represents the Hub genes, and the green represents the predicted target genes.
Figure 12KEGG analysis of the top 20 pathways. The size of each dot equates to the number of genes cataloged in the entry, and the color of each dot relates to the corrected p value.
Figure 13CRS anti-inflammatory activity is regulated by XF via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. (a) PI3K and AKT expression levels in different groups. (b) PI3K protein reactive expression. (c) AKT protein reactive expression. ∗p < 0.05 Vs control, #p < 0.05 Vs model.