Literature DB >> 35287268

Short-Term Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Subclinical Hypothyroidism: A Comparative Approach of Iranian and American Guidelines.

Farahnaz Mir1, Hossein Chiti1, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Subclinical hypothyroidism during pregnancy can be associated with numerous adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term adverse pregnancy outcomes in treated versus nontreated patients who fall within the numerical range of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) between the Iranian and American reference ranges. Materials and
Methods: Eighty pregnant women with a known level of antithyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) and TSH levels of 2.5-3.9 mIu/L in the first trimester and 3-4.1 mIu/L in the second and third trimesters were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned into two groups including 41 patients in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. The intervention group was treated with levothyroxine at least 50 μg/day and the control group received no treatment. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 23.
Results: The only significant findings were a correlation between pregnancy loss frequency (p - 0.011) and/or increased TSH level in the follow-up period (p = 0.008) with anti-TPO antibody positivity. Forty-four percent of mothers with positive anti-TPO Ab needed treatment initiation with levothyroxine, based on Iranian guidelines, due to increased TSH level during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: Untreated pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism, who were placed in the intermediate range of TSH, recommended by Iranian and American guidelines, did not show any significant difference in short-term adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to the treated patients. Positive anti-TPO Ab may play a role in the development of short-term complications in mothers with subclinical hypothyroidism or it may increase the likelihood of an increase in TSH level during pregnancy.
Copyright © 2022 Farahnaz Mir et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35287268      PMCID: PMC8917947          DOI: 10.1155/2022/9315250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thyroid Res


1. Introduction

Numerous comorbidities may threaten pregnancy, one of which is subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) [1]. Iranian and American reference ranges have introduced different levels of TSH as a criterion for initiating treatment in SCH during pregnancy. According to Iranian guidelines, when the TSH level is higher than 3.9 mIu/ml in the first trimester or higher than 4.1 mIu/ml in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes may increase [2]. American guidelines put these numbers above 2.5 mIu/ml in the first trimester and above 3 mIu/ml in the second and third trimesters [3]. The most important adverse outcomes of pregnancy resulting from untreated SCH are pregnancy loss [4], miscarriage [5,6], intrauterine fetal death [5], placental abruption [7], and an increased risk of neonatal cognitive-neurological disorders [8,9]. The information obtained from systematic reviews and meta-analysis is so limited which necessitates further studies in this field. An important meta-analysis in Iranian pregnant women showed a high prevalence of thyroid disorders especially subclinical and clinical hypothyroidism [1]. Another meta-analysis evaluated the complications of pregnancy in mothers with subclinical hypothyroidism and showed that these women were at a higher risk for pregnancy loss, neonatal death, placental abruption, and premature rupture of membranes compared to euthyroid women [10]. Several meta-analyses, albeit with a small number of studies, have reported the preventive effects of levothyroxine therapy on maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism. The most important maternal and fetal complications that have decreased following levothyroxine treatment in these women are pregnancy loss and neonatal death [11,12]. Most meta-analyses have not been able to show a beneficial effect of levothyroxine treatment in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism in reducing other maternal and fetal complications or improving the IQ level of children resulting from these pregnancies [11-13]. In one of these meta-analyses, levothyroxine treatment even led to preterm labor [11]. Most studies also have revealed an association between thyroid autoimmunity and recurrent pregnancy loss [14]. Due to the possibility of these complications and lack of enough data, treatment of SCH in pregnancy actually seems a necessity. The Iranian guideline is based on a study conducted in Tehran, and given the ethnic differences in Iran, the need to launch other studies in other provinces seemed reasonable. On the other hand, the decision to treat mothers who had a TSH number between the numbers recommended by the Iranian guideline and the numbers recommended by the American guideline was not specified. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of adverse short-term outcomes of pregnancy, especially pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, and premature rupture of the membrane in untreated pregnant mothers who had a TSH number between the two recommended numbers proposed by the Iranian and American guidelines. The proposal of this article was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences and was registered on the IRCT site with the code: IRCT20180314039091N1.

2. Materials and Methods

In a randomized clinical trial, 106 pregnant women who primarily had a TSH level of ≥3.9 mIu/ml and ≤2.5 mIu/ml in the first trimester of pregnancy or ≥4.1 mIu/ml and ≤3 mIu/ml in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, reevaluated with thyroid function tests (TSH, total T4, and free T4) and anti-TPO Ab in a predetermined laboratory and who again fulfilled the abovementioned TSH range, included in the study. The required sample size was calculated based on the available data about adverse pregnancy outcomes attributed to the effects of clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy [15]. The following values were assigned to each of the variables: p1 = 0.3 (ratio of adverse effects in the intervention group), p2 = 0.6 (ratio of adverse effects in the control group), β = 0.2, and power = 80%. Based on initial data, 42 subjects were calculated to participate in each group. Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) method and COBASS-E411 device were used to perform these tests. The defined CVs in the measurement kits were 3.2, 0.97, 2.48, and 5.9 for TSH, total T4, free T4, and anti-TPO Ab, respectively. Anti-TPO Ab levels of more than 34 IU were defined as a positive test. In addition to the predefined TSH level, other inclusion criteria included normal thyroid size without any nodules on examination, no history of thyroid surgery or previous administration of radioactive iodine or concomitant nonthyroid disease, and the presence of singleton pregnancy. The levothyroxine made by Iran Hormone factory, at least 50 micrograms daily, was used to treat patients. The TSH level was reevaluated 4 weeks after enrollment, then every 4 weeks until the 24th week of pregnancy, and finally at 32 to 36 weeks of gestation. Finally, 80 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned into two groups including the levothyroxine treatment group (n = 41) and nontreatment group (n = 39). Pregnant women who could not complete the follow-up period or did not use levothyroxine properly, those who developed another disease during pregnancy or had to take thyroid-metabolizing drugs such as corticosteroids and beta-blockers, were excluded from the study. The data obtained from this study were described using central and dispersion indices. We used chi-square and Fisher tests for qualitative variables, T-test for quantitative variables with normal distribution, and Mann–Whitney tests for quantitative variables without normal distribution. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 23.

3. Results

A total of 80 women with singleton pregnancies participated in the present study, of which 41 were placed in the intervention group and 39 in the control group. The youngest and the oldest participants were 16 and 43 years old, respectively, with a mean age of 28.79 years. There was no previous history of abortion in 75% and stillbirths in 97.5% of participants. Forty-three percent of women were considered nulliparous. The only qualitative variable that showed a significant difference between the two groups was the type of pregnancy (p = 0.023). The control group had a higher percentage of normal pregnancies compared to the intervention group. Regarding variables such as place of residence, mean maternal age, mean gestational age, history of fetal death, history of previous abortion, type of previous pregnancies, number of previous abortions, number of live births, number of deliveries, and history of hypothyroidism or gestational diabetes in previous pregnancies, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of the frequency distribution of baseline qualitative characteristics between the intervention and control groups.

VariableIntervention group (number (%))Control group (number (%)) p value
LocationCity37 (52.1)34 (47.9)0.665
Village4 (44.4)5(55.6)

History of a dead fetusYes0 (0.0)2 (100)0.23
No41 (52.6)37 (47.4)

Type of pregnancyNormal28 (44.4)35 (55.6)0.023
IVF6 (100)0 (0.0)
Other cases (with medication)7 (63.6)4 (36.4)

History of previous miscarriagesYes13 (65.0)7 (35.0)0.155
No28 (46.7)32 (53.3)

PregnancyFirst17 (56.7)13 (43.3)0.738
Second15 (46.9)17 (53.1)
Third and more9 (50.0)9 (50.0)

Number of deliveriesNone25 (58.1)18 (41.9)0.146
One15 (53.6)13 (46.4)
Two and more1 (11.1)8 (88.9)

Number of previous abortionsNone30 (50.0)30 (50.0)0.597
One6 (45.2)7 (53.8)
Two and more5 (71.4)2 (28.6)

Number of live birthsNone25 (58.1)18 (41.9)0.146
One15 (53.6)13 (46.4)
Two and more1 (11.1)8 (88.9)

History of gestational diabetesYes2 (28.6)5 (71.4)0.209
No39 (53.4)34 (46.6)

Hypothyroidism in previous pregnanciesYes8 (80.0)2 (20.0)0.052
No33 (47.1)37 (52.9)
Among the quantitative variables, there was no significant difference in total T4, free T4, TSH, and anti-TPO Ab levels between the two groups. Although the amount of baseline TSH in the intervention group (3.4 mIu/L) was only slightly higher than that in the control group (3.2 mIu/L), this difference was considered statistically significant (p < 0.0001) (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of the baseline quantitative and clinical variables between the intervention and control groups (mean ± SD).

VariableIntervention (M ± SD)Control (M ± SD) p value
Maternal age28.1 ± 7.230.2 ± 5.30.163
Gestational age15.27 ± 7.518.2 ± 8.40.104
TSH level3.4 ± 0.302.3 ± 0.36<0.0001
T4 level10 ± 2.510 ± 2.40.90
Free T4 level1.7 ± 3.11.5 ± 2.010.753
In the present study, the total frequency of positive anti-TPO Ab test (≥34 IU) was 20% (n = 15), of which 16.22% (n = 6) were considered in the intervention group and 23.68% (n = 9) in the control group. The total frequency of negative anti-TPO Ab test (<34 IU) was 80% (n = 60), of which 83.78% (n = 31) were considered in the intervention group and 76.31% (n = 29) in the control group (p value = 0.553). The level of follow-up TSH (p = 0.018) and final TSH (p = 0.0001) of patients showed a significant difference between the two groups; however, changes in total and free T4 levels of patients during the follow-up period did not show a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.444 and p = 0.375, respectively) (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of the follow-up hormones related to thyroid function between the intervention and control groups (mean ± SD).

VariableIntervention (M ± SD)Control (M ± SD) p value
Follow-up total T410 ± 1.0411.1 ± 3.090.444
Follow-up free T40.98 ± 0.350.86 ± 0.20.375
Follow-up TSH2.06 ± 1.162.7 ± 1.20.018
Final TSH1.64 ± 0.82.37 ± 0.860.0001
Among the adverse outcomes of pregnancy, placental abruption, placenta previa, eclampsia, preeclampsia, and neonatal death were not seen in our study. There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of adverse pregnancy outcomes (p < 0.05). In total, 6.25% (5 women) lost their pregnancies. The rate of pregnancy loss in the intervention and control groups was 7.32% and 5.13%, respectively (p = 0.686). In this study, 10% of participants (8 women) had preterm delivery and its rate was the same in the intervention group as in the control group (p = 0.941). The rate of premature rupture of membranes did not show a significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p = 0.330). The most common complication observed in the control and intervention groups was preterm delivery with a percentage of 10.25 and 9.97, respectively (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of short-term pregnancy complications between the two groups.

VariableStudy groupTotal p value
Intervention group (n (%))Control group (n (%))
Loss of pregnancyYes3 (7.32)2 (5.13)5 (3.6)0.686
No38 (92.68)37 (94.87)75 (8.93)

PretermYes4 (9.75)4 (10.25)8 (0.10)0.941
No37 (90.25)35 (89.75)72 (90.0)

Premature rupture of the membranesYes3 (7.32)1 (2.56)4 (0.5)0.330
No38 (92.68)38 (97.44)76 (0.95)
Total41 (51.25)39 (48.75)80 (100)
Fifteen women from all of the participants had a positive test for TPO Ab (≥34 IU). The rate of anti-TPO positivity was 3 in those who lost their pregnancies, while 12 in those who did not (p = 0.021). No association was found between anti-TPO Ab test positivity and premature rupture of membrane or preterm delivery (p > 0.05). Of the 39 participants in the control group, 9 participants, according to the level of follow-up TSH, reached a level beyond the Iranian recommendations for initiation of treatment with levothyroxine. Four out of these participants (44.44%), who needed treatment with levothyroxine, had a positive anti-TPO test (p = 0.008). Most of these women who needed treatment were in the second trimester of pregnancy (55.56%); however, this difference was not statistically significant in terms of time required for treatment (p = 0.059) (Table 5).
Table 5

Frequency of positive anti-TPO Ab in control cases with increasing TSH required to treatment with levothyroxine during the follow-up period according to Iranian guidelines.

VariableConvert control group to treatmentTotal p value
Yes (number (%))No (number (%))
Anti-TPO Ab positivityYes4 (44.44)26 (67.86)30 (100.00)0.008
No5 (56.55)4 (33.13)9 (100.00)

Trimester of pregnancyFirst1 (11.11)10 (33.33)11 (20.28)0.059
Second5 (55.56)13 (33.43)18 (15.46)
Third3 (33.33)7 (34.23)10 (64.25)

Total9 (100.00)30 (100.00)39 (100.00)
A subgroup analysis of women with positive anti-TPO Ab showed a significant more pregnancy loss in this group (p = 0.011). We did not find any meaningful statistical difference between the two groups about the first-minute low Apgar score of neonates. The frequency of first-minute low Apgar score in the intervention and control groups was 7.32 and 2.57%, respectively.

4. Discussion

This study showed that levothyroxine therapy in pregnant women with TSH levels between the numerical numbers of American and Iranian guidelines had no significant effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes including pregnancy loss, premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, eclampsia, and preeclampsia. However, in mothers who were positive for anti-TPO Ab, the need to start levothyroxine treatment during the follow-up period was higher than anti-TPO Ab-negative women. A cohort study from the United States showed an increased risk of miscarriage (OR = 3.66) when the TSH level in early pregnancy was above the 95th percentile. However, in this study, both subclinical and clinical cases of hypothyroidism were evaluated [16]. Our study did not show a significant difference in the incidence of abortion between the two groups. A retrospective study found that those who experience abortion during pregnancy had higher mean TSH levels and lower mean free T4 levels in early pregnancy [17]. Liu et al. reported an increased risk of miscarriage due to increased maternal TSH concentration, which was enhanced by the presence of a positive TPO Ab [6]. Negro et al. reported a higher rate of pregnancy loss in TPO Ab-negative women with TSH concentrations between 2.5 and 5 compared to those whose TSH concentrations were below 2.5 mIu/L (6.1% vs. 3.6%) [4]. Männistö et al. in another study showed that subclinical hypothyroidism increases the risk of pregnancy complications in TPO Ab-positive women [18]. Similarly, Benhadi et al. in a prospective cohort study of 2,497 Dutch women reported a higher risk of miscarriage, fetal death, or infant death in mothers with subclinical hypothyroidism [5]. In our study, a significant number of control members who had adequate TSH and T4 at the time of enrollment reached a range of TSH levels that required levothyroxine treatment in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. A significant percentage of these subjects had positive anti-TPO antibody. This suggests that pregnant women who are at higher risk for thyroid diseases should have shorter intervals of hormonal follow-up, especially TSH level measurement, than others. Our study did not show a significant difference in the first-minute Apgar score of infants between the intervention and control groups. Feldthusen et al. showed a higher percentage of low Apgar scores at birth (less than 7 in 1 minute after birth) in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH>4.4) compared to pregnant women with normal thyroid function (p = 0.02) [19]. Our study failed to establish a correlation between anti-TPO Ab positivity and preterm delivery or premature rupture of membranes. Korevaar et al. reported that higher levels of TSH and subclinical hypothyroidism increase the risk of preterm delivery. They also showed that anti-TPO Ab positivity was associated with a 1.7-fold increase in the risk of preterm labor and a 2.5-fold increase in the risk of very preterm labor [20]. In the present study, the most frequent complication of pregnancy was preterm delivery followed by pregnancy loss and the least complication was premature rupture of membranes. Although these findings were not significantly correlated to the TSH level of pregnant women, positive anti-TPO Ab mothers had a significantly higher rate of pregnancy loss and progress to the subclinical hypothyroid state. In the study of Liu et al. the complications of pregnancy, such as abortion at a much lower gestational age, were more than 2 times in anti-TPO Ab-positive women compared to TPO-Ab-negative ones [4-6]. Männistö et al. surveyed the association between pregnancy outcomes and thyroid function at 12-week gestation in 5805 pregnant women and found no significant association between thyroid function and prenatal morbidity [18]. The result of our study is consistent with the study of Männistö et al., but it does not agree with the results of the study by Liu et al. The reasons for the insignificance of the findings of our study were likely the small sample size and narrow range of TSH defined for the adverse consequences of pregnancy. Another reason for the difference in the results of this study with other studies could be the genetic difference between the different races in terms of susceptibility to the complications of any disease.

5. Conclusion

In pregnant women whose TSH range is between the two limits defined in the Iranian and American guidelines, lack of treatment with levothyroxine does not increase the adverse short-term consequences of pregnancy. Positive anti-TPO Ab may play a role in the development of short-term complications in mothers with subclinical hypothyroidism or it may increase the likelihood of an increase in TSH level during pregnancy.
  20 in total

1.  Subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy: intellectual development of offspring.

Authors:  Hossein Ghorbani Behrooz; Maryam Tohidi; Yadollah Mehrabi; Ebrahim Ghorbani Behrooz; Mehdi Tehranidoost; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  Establishment of the trimester-specific reference range for free thyroxine index.

Authors:  Fereidoun Azizi; Azizi Fereidoun; Ladan Mehran; Mehran Ladan; Atieh Amouzegar; Amouzegar Atieh; Hossein Delshad; Delshad Hossein; Maryam Tohidi; Tohidi Maryam; Sahar Askari; Askari Sahar; Mehdi Hedayati
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Abnormalities of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy affect neuropsychological development of their children at 25-30 months.

Authors:  Yuanbin Li; Zhongyan Shan; Weiping Teng; Xiaohui Yu; Yushu Li; Chenling Fan; Xiaochun Teng; Rui Guo; Hong Wang; Jia Li; Yanyan Chen; Weiwei Wang; Masauso Chawinga; Li Zhang; Liu Yang; Yaru Zhao; Tianyi Hua
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Subclinical hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity in recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allan C Dong; Jessica Morgan; Monica Kane; Alex Stagnaro-Green; Mary D Stephenson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Spyridoula Maraka; Naykky M Singh Ospina; Derek T O'Keeffe; Ana E Espinosa De Ycaza; Michael R Gionfriddo; Patricia J Erwin; Charles C Coddington; Marius N Stan; M Hassan Murad; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  Risk factors and a clinical prediction model for low maternal thyroid function during early pregnancy: two population-based prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Tim I M Korevaar; Daan Nieboer; Peter H L T Bisschop; Mariette Goddijn; Marco Medici; Layal Chaker; Yolanda B de Rijke; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Theo J Visser; Ewout W Steyerberg; Henning Tiemeier; Tanja G Vrijkotte; Robin P Peeters
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.478

7.  Pregnancy-induced alterations in mitochondrial function in euthyroid pregnant women and pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism; relation to adverse outcome.

Authors:  Anne-Dorthe Feldthusen; Jacob Larsen; Palle L Pedersen; Tina Toft Kristensen; Jan Kvetny
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-24

8.  Thyroid dysfunction in Iranian pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farnaz Sepasi; Tayebeh Rashidian; Mehdi Shokri; Gholamreza Badfar; Fatemeh Kazemi; Milad Azami
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Impact of levothyroxine therapy on obstetric, neonatal and childhood outcomes in women with subclinical hypothyroidism diagnosed in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yamamoto; Jamie L Benham; Kara A Nerenberg; Lois E Donovan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Levothyroxine and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with subclinical hypothyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magnus Bein; Oriana Hoi Yun Yu; Sonia Marzia Grandi; Francesca Y E Frati; Ihab Kandil; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.