Literature DB >> 35286421

Is routine imaging necessary prior to percutaneous abscess catheter removal?

Mehmet A Sari1, Andrés Camacho1, Muneeb Ahmed1, Bettina Siewert1, Iris Brook1, Olga R Brook2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine management after abscess drainage includes CT or fluoroscopic imaging to assess for residual abscess cavity prior to catheter removal. It is unclear whether this practice is necessary in patients without residual infection signs and symptoms.
PURPOSE: To evaluate safety of abscess catheter removal without follow-up imaging in patients without residual clinical or laboratory signs of infection and catheter output < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant, retrospective study, consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous CT-guided drainage of a single abdominal or pelvic abscess between 01/2015 and 12/2017 in a single tertiary academic institution with or without follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal were included. In our institution, catheters are routinely removed without imaging if there are no clinical (fever, pain) or laboratory (elevated WBC count) signs of infection and catheter output is < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days. Patients' and abscess's characteristics, repeat imaging data, and need for re-interventions were obtained through medical records review. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test for independent data and Student's t-test for comparison of group means.
RESULTS: 310 consecutive patients (age 56 ± 16 years, 48% female) were included in the study. In 265/310 (85%) patients, no routine follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal was obtained. In 2/265 (0.8%, 95% CI 0.02-0.27%) patients without routine pre-removal imaging, repeat abscess drainage was required 6 and 15 days after catheter removal in patient with perforated appendicitis and after laparoscopic renal cyst decortication, respectively. No patients, 0/45 (0%, 95% CI 0-0.07), that underwent routine imaging without clinical or laboratory signs infection needed to undergo a repeat abscess drainage.
CONCLUSION: There is a low rate (0.8%) of abscess recurrence if percutaneous abscess catheter is removed at the time cessation of drainage without routine imaging in clinically well patient.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abscess; Computed tomography; Percutaneous image-guided drainage

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35286421     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03460-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  13 in total

1.  Predictive factors for failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abscess after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Fulgence Kassi; Anthony Dohan; Philippe Soyer; Eric Vicaut; Mourad Boudiaf; Patrice Valleur; Marc Pocard
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Effect of abdominopelvic abscess drain size on drainage time and probability of occlusion.

Authors:  Jessica A Rotman; George I Getrajdman; Majid Maybody; Joseph P Erinjeri; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; F Edward Boas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Management of abdominal and pelvic abscesses that persist despite satisfactory percutaneous drainage catheter placement.

Authors:  Michael S Gee; John Y Kim; Debra A Gervais; Peter F Hahn; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Use of drains in surgery: a review.

Authors:  Rajaraman Durai; Abdoolla Mownah; Philip C H Ng
Journal:  J Perioper Pract       Date:  2009-06

5.  Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses: a five-year experience.

Authors:  S G Gerzof; A H Robbins; W C Johnson; D H Birkett; D C Nabseth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Radiologic drainage of post-operative collections and abscesses.

Authors:  B Robert; T Yzet; J M Regimbeau
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.043

7.  Current concepts of percutaneous abscess drainage in postoperative retention.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Holger Bartels; Wolfgang Weiss; Hermann Berger; Hubert J Stein; Joerg R Siewert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Can failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal abscesses be predicted?

Authors:  Stéphane Benoist; Yves Panis; Virginie Pannegeon; Philippe Soyer; Thierry Watrin; Mourad Boudiaf; Patrice Valleur
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Recurrent abdominal and pelvic abscesses: incidence, results of repeated percutaneous drainage, and underlying causes in 956 drainages.

Authors:  Debra A Gervais; Chie Hee Ho; Mary J O'Neill; Ronald S Arellano; Peter F Hahn; Peter R Mueller; Chi-Hi Ho
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Factors influencing the outcome of image-guided percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscess after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Yoshiki Okita; Yasuhiko Mohri; Minako Kobayashi; Toshimitsu Araki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Koichiro Yamakado; Kan Takeda; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.