| Literature DB >> 35286349 |
Gabriele Babini1, Giorgio Baiocco1, Sofia Barbieri1,2, Jacopo Morini1, Traimate Sangsuwan3, Siamak Haghdoost3,4, Ramesh Yentrapalli5, Omid Azimzadeh5,6, Charlotte Rombouts7,8, An Aerts7, Roel Quintens7, Teni Ebrahimian9, Mohammed Abderrafi Benotmane7, Raghda Ramadan7, Sarah Baatout7,8, Soile Tapio5, Mats Harms-Ringdahl3, Andrea Ottolenghi1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of chronic low-dose-rate gamma-radiation at a multi-scale level. The specific objective was to obtain an overall view of the endothelial cell response, by integrating previously published data on different cellular endpoints and highlighting possible different mechanisms underpinning radiation-induced senescence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35286349 PMCID: PMC8920222 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Effects of chronic ionizing radiation exposures on the growth rate of HUVECs.
Experimental points are time-series data of the mean cell population increase ±SEM (n = 3) (Yentrapalli, Azimzadeh, Sriharshan, et al. 2013; Yentrapalli, Azimzadeh, Barjaktarovic, et al. 2013). Continuous lines represent the best-fit curves of each dataset, obtained with Eq (3).
Best fit values of the r parameter in Eq (3) as a function of the dose rate.
| Parameter "r" | Parameter "K" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose rate | Value ± SD | % error | Value ± SD | % error | Degrees of freedom |
| 0 mGy/h (sham) | 1.450 ± 0.022 | 1.54% | 1.89·106 ± 2.7·105 | 14.39% | 14 |
| 1.4 mGy/h | 1.164 ± 0.015 | 1.32% | 7.02·104 ± 3.82·104 | 54.49% | 14 |
| 2.4 mGy/h | 1.052 ± 0.041 | 3.89% | 3.03·103 ± 3.2·102 | 10.62% | 11 |
| 4.1 mGy/h | 0.960 ± 0.043 | 4.50% | 3.70·102 ± 7.2·101 | 19.39% | 7 |
Fits to experimental data and statistics were done using Gnuplot Version 5.0 open source software (http://www.gnuplot.info). The "fit" command used in Gnuplot can fit the user-defined functions (Eq (3)) to a set of data points (x, y, y-standard-deviation), using an implementation of the nonlinear least-squares (NLLS) Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm.
Fig 2Effects of chronic ionizing radiation exposures on senescence levels of HUVECs.
Experimental points are time series data of the mean percentages of SA- β -gal stained cells ± SEM (n = 3) (Yentrapalli, Azimzadeh, Sriharshan, et al. 2013; Yentrapalli, Azimzadeh, Barjaktarovic, et al. 2013). Continuous lines represent the best-fit curves of each dataset, obtained with Eq (5), drawn up to the last experimental time point available. Dashed lines represent the continuation for longer time points of the best-fit curves, to highlight the differences among the obtained graphs.
Best fit values of the p parameter in Eq (5) as a function of the dose rate.
| Parameter "p" | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose rate | Value ± SD | % error | Degrees of freedom |
| 0 mGy/h (sham) | 0.184 ± 0.027 | 14.9% | 4 |
| 1.4 mGy/h | 0.215 ± 0.017 | 7.8% | 4 |
| 2.4 mGy/h | 0.252 ± 0.037 | 14.6% | 3 |
| 4.1 mGy/h | 0.532 ± 0.102 | 19.2% | 1 |
| Endt et al. data | 0.160 ± 0.018 | 11.3% | 6 |
Fits to experimental data and statistics were done using Gnuplot Version 5.0 open source software (http://www.gnuplot.info). The "fit" command used in Gnuplot can fit the user-defined functions (Eq (5)) to a set of data points (x, y, y-standard-deviation), using an implementation of the nonlinear least-squares (NLLS) Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm.
Fig 3Effects of chronic ionizing radiation exposures on the functionality of HUVECs.
Experimental points are percentages of branches per site (average over 10 sites), as a measure of cell capacity to form vascular networks: A) data are plotted as a function of the exposure time; B) data are plotted as a function of the total cumulative dose received. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with n = 3.*p-value<0.05 and **p-value<0.01 versus untreated HUVECs at the same time (Ebrahimian et al. 2015).
Fig 4Numbers of deregulated proteins at the different time points and exposure dose rates compared to sham irradiated controls at the same time point.
A) Shows the overlapping proteins after 1.4 mGy/h for 10 weeks and after 4.1 mGy/h for 3 weeks (total dose of 2.35 and 2.07 Gy, respectively). B) Shows the overlapping proteins after 2.4 mGy/h for 10 weeks and 4.1 mGy/h for 6 weeks (total dose of 4.0 and 4.1 Gy, respectively). Bold numbers: Up-regulated; Red numbers: Contra-regulated in the two conditions; Underlined numbers: Down-regulated.
List of senescence-related pathways identified for the highest total cumulative dose comparison of the proteomics profiles of 4.1 mGy/h for 6 weeks (right) and 2.4 mGy/h for 10 weeks (left).
| 2.4 mGy/h 10 weeks (4.0 Gy) | 4.1 mGy/h 6 weeks (4.1 Gy) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathways | Number of protein in gene set | Protein from network | P-value | FDR | Nodes | Number of protein in gene set | Protein from network | P-value | FDR | Nodes |
| Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP)(R) | 50 | 7 | 0.0005 | 7.97E-03 | MAPK1, RPS27A, RELA, UBA52, FOS, CDK2, UBC | 50 | 4 | 0.0004 | 3.34E-03 | NFKB1, MAPK1, UBA52, HIST1H4A |
| Oncogene Induced Senescence(R) | 30 | 6 | 0.0002 | 3.75E-03 | MAPK1, ETS1, RPS27A, UBA52, E2F1, UBC | 30 | 3 | 0.0011 | 7.32E-03 | TP53, MAPK1, UBA52 |
| DNA Damage/Telomere Stress Induced Senescence(R) | 26 | 3 | 0.0007 | 5.73E-03 | TP53, HMGA1, HIST1H4A | |||||
| Oxidative Stress Induced Senescence(R) | 64 | 4 | 0.0009 | 6.53E-03 | TP53, MAPK1, UBA52, HIST1H4A | |||||