Literature DB >> 35285850

Evaluating the Association Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Relative and Absolute Effects of Statin Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Paula Byrne1, Maryanne Demasi2, Mark Jones3, Susan M Smith1,4, Kirsty K O'Brien5, Robert DuBroff6.   

Abstract

Importance: The association between statin-induced reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the absolute risk reduction of individual, rather than composite, outcomes, such as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, is unclear. Objective: To assess the association between absolute reductions in LDL-C levels with treatment with statin therapy and all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke to facilitate shared decision-making between clinicians and patients and inform clinical guidelines and policy. Data Sources: PubMed and Embase were searched to identify eligible trials from January 1987 to June 2021. Study Selection: Large randomized clinical trials that examined the effectiveness of statins in reducing total mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with a planned duration of 2 or more years and that reported absolute changes in LDL-C levels. Interventions were treatment with statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) vs placebo or usual care. Participants were men and women older than 18 years. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Three independent reviewers extracted data and/or assessed the methodological quality and certainty of the evidence using the risk of bias 2 tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Any differences in opinion were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses and a meta-regression were undertaken. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke. Findings: Twenty-one trials were included in the analysis. Meta-analyses showed reductions in the absolute risk of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%) for stroke in those randomized to treatment with statins, with associated relative risk reductions of 9% (95% CI, 5%-14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%-34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%-22%) respectively. A meta-regression exploring the potential mediating association of the magnitude of statin-induced LDL-C reduction with outcomes was inconclusive. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that the absolute risk reductions of treatment with statins in terms of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke are modest compared with the relative risk reductions, and the presence of significant heterogeneity reduces the certainty of the evidence. A conclusive association between absolute reductions in LDL-C levels and individual clinical outcomes was not established, and these findings underscore the importance of discussing absolute risk reductions when making informed clinical decisions with individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35285850      PMCID: PMC8922205          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   44.409


  39 in total

1.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Goutham Rao; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Jack Boyd; Frank D'Amico; Nefertiti H Durant; Mark A Hlatky; George Howard; Katherine Kirley; Christopher Masi; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Anthony E Solomonides; Colin P West; Jennifer Wessel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter S Sever; Björn Dahlöf; Neil R Poulter; Hans Wedel; Gareth Beevers; Mark Caulfield; Rory Collins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Arni Kristinsson; Gordon T McInnes; Jesper Mehlsen; Markku Nieminen; Eoin O'Brien; Jan Ostergren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn; J Covey; E Matthews; R Pill
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar

5.  Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Eleanor Danielson; Francisco A H Fonseca; Jacques Genest; Antonio M Gotto; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Peter Libby; Alberto J Lorenzatti; Jean G MacFadyen; Børge G Nordestgaard; James Shepherd; James T Willerson; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Nathan F Dieckmann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy.

Authors:  Rory Collins; Christina Reith; Jonathan Emberson; Jane Armitage; Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Roger Blumenthal; John Danesh; George Davey Smith; David DeMets; Stephen Evans; Malcolm Law; Stephen MacMahon; Seth Martin; Bruce Neal; Neil Poulter; David Preiss; Paul Ridker; Ian Roberts; Anthony Rodgers; Peter Sandercock; Kenneth Schulz; Peter Sever; John Simes; Liam Smeeth; Nicholas Wald; Salim Yusuf; Richard Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Paula Byrne; John Cullinan; Amelia Smith; Susan M Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Error in Figure 3.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 44.409

2.  Opposing View: A Blind Faith in Meta-Analyses in Academia Could Be a Threat to Public Health.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Lipid Atheroscler       Date:  2022-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.