| Literature DB >> 35285694 |
Xuejin Feng1, Ta-Hui Lin1, Wei Yan2,1, Xingyu Huang1, Le Xie1, Shuzhen Wei1, Kun Zhou3,4, Yi-Lung Chen1, Weicheng Luo1, Wenqian Xu5, Wei Zhang2, Muhammad Zohaib Nawaz1, Ya-Wei Luo1, Qinglu Zeng4,6,7, Rui Zhang1, Nianzhi Jiao1.
Abstract
Prochlorococcus is the key primary producer in marine ecosystems, and the high-light-adapted clade II (HLII) is the most abundant ecotype. However, the genomic and ecological basis of Prochlorococcus HLII in the marine environment has remained elusive. Here, we show that the ecologically coherent subclade differentiation of HLII corresponds to genomic and ecological characteristics on the basis of analyses of 31 different strains of HLII, including 12 novel isolates. Different subclades of HLII with different core and accessory genes were identified, and their distribution in the marine environment was explored using the TARA Oceans metagenome database. Three major subclade groups were identified, viz., the surface group (HLII-SG), the transition group (HLII-TG), and the deep group (HLII-DG). These subclade groups showed different temperature ranges and optima for distribution. In regression analyses, temperature and nutrient availability were identified as key factors affecting the distribution of HLII subclades. A 35% increase in the relative abundance of HLII-SG by the end of the 21st century was predicted under the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario. Our results show that the ubiquity and distribution of Prochlorococcus HLII in the marine environment are associated with the differentiation of diverse subclades. These findings provide insights into the large-scale shifts in the Prochlorococcus community in response to future climate change. IMPORTANCE Prochlorococcus is the most abundant oxygenic photosynthetic microorganism on Earth, and high-light-adapted clade II (HLII) is the dominant ecotype. However, the factors behind the dominance of HLII in the vast oligotrophic oceans are still unknown. Here, we identified three distinct groups of HLII subclades, viz., the surface group (HLII-SG), the transition group (HLII-TG), and the deep group (HLII-DG). We further demonstrated that the ecologically coherent subclade differentiation of HLII corresponds to genomic and ecological characteristics. Our study suggests that the differentiation of diverse subclades underlies the ubiquity and distribution of Prochlorococcus HLII in the marine environment and provides insights into the shifts in the Prochlorococcus community in response to future climate change.Entities:
Keywords: Prochlorococcus HLII; metagenome; pangenome; subclade differentiation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35285694 PMCID: PMC9040837 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03027-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.786
FIG 1Phylogenomic diversity and environmental distribution of HLII strains. (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed from the core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 31 Prochlorococcus HLII strains, with two HLI strains as an outgroup. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values for 1000 resamplings (at least 80% support). (B) Genome characteristics and isolation depths of 33 HL strains. Heatmaps of log-transformed relative abundances in TARA Oceans metagenome libraries for each strain at different depths (C) and temperatures (D). Color gradient indicates increasing values of the relevant measurement from minimums (blue or green) to maximums within a row (red or yellow). Gray color indicates no detection. SG, TG, and DG indicate Prochlorococcus HLII surface group, transition group, and deep group, respectively. Relative abundances of HLII strains were normalized to the total abundance of all HLII reads. As an outgroup, relative abundances of HLI strains were normalized to the total abundance of HLI and HLII reads.
FIG 2Contrasting Prochlorococcus HLII surface group and deep group. Panels A and B represent genome sizes and GC contents of whole genomes from Prochlorococcus HLII surface group (HLII-SG) and deep group (HLII-DG), respectively. Panels C and D represent genome sizes and GC contents of core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from HLII-SG and HLII-DG, respectively. Colored circles represent individual genome values, and bars indicate one standard deviation. The number of colored circles denotes the number of statistical tests showing a significant difference (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001).
FIG 3Pangenome of Prochlorococcus HLII. (A) Distribution of 5,073 genes in the pangenome of Prochlorococcus HLII. (B) Distribution of the genes which were considered core genes based on 50% amino acid similarity cutoff but fell in the category of accessory genes while using 70% cutoff. (C) Distribution of 992 accessory genes in the 31 genomes of Prochlorococcus HLII. Dendrograms above the two heatmaps show hierarchical clustering of the 31 HLII genomes based on gene distribution (Euclidian distance). SG, TG, and DG indicate Prochlorococcus HLII surface group, transition group, and deep group, respectively.
FIG 4Relationships among Prochlorococcus HLII genomes based on phylogenomics (A) and on distribution (B) of 992 accessory genes. (A) Tree on the left shows the phylogeny constructed from core genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 31 Prochlorococcus HLII strains using maximum likelihood (same as Fig. 1A). Two HLI strains (MED4 and MIT9515) were used as an outgroup (not shown). Numbers on branches indicate estimated number of genes gained (red) and lost (blue) during evolution of Prochlorococcus HLII. (B) Tree on the right shows the clustering of the same HLII genomes based on the distribution of 992 accessory genes recovered from the pangenomic analysis (Euclidian distance).
FIG 5R-squared plots showing explanatory power of environmental variables for relative abundances of HLI and HLII subclades in univariate regression models. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Red columns indicate linear models, and green columns indicate quadratic models. For statistical analyses, HLI relative abundance was normalized to all HL relative abundances (HLI and HLII). Relative abundances of HLII subclades were normalized to relative abundance of all HLII.
FIG 6(A) Present global relative abundance and distribution of HLI and major HLII subclades at the sea surface (1990s). Changes in relative abundance between present and future climate (1990s and 2090s) at the sea surface for HLI and major HLII subclades under RCP 4.5 (B) and 8.5 scenarios (C). For statistical analyses, HLI relative abundance was normalized to relative abundance of all HL (HLI and HLII). Relative abundances of HLII subclades were normalized to relative abundance of all HLII.