| Literature DB >> 35285678 |
Keng Po Lai1,2,3,4, Peng Zhu2, Delbert Almerick T Boncan5, Lu Yang2, Cherry Chi Tim Leung3, Jeff Cheuk Hin Ho3, Xiao Lin6, Ting Fung Chan5, Richard Yuen Chong Kong3,4,7, William Ka Fai Tse8.
Abstract
Aquatic fishes face osmotic stress continuously, and the gill is the first tissue that senses and responds to the external osmotic challenges. However, the understandings of how the gill microbiota could respond to osmotic stress and their potential host-bacterium relationships are limited. The objectives of the current study are to identify the hypotonic responsive genes in the gill cells and profile the gill microbiota communities after fresh water transfer experiment via transcriptome sequencing and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Transcriptome sequencing identified 1,034 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), such as aquaporin and sodium potassium chloride cotransporter, after the fresh water transfer. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis further highlighted the steroid biosynthesis and glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis pathways in the gill. Moreover, the 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified Vibrio as the dominant bacterium in the seawater, which changed to Pseudomonas and Cetobacterium after the fresh water transfer. The alpha diversity analysis suggested that the gill bacterial diversity was lower in the fresh water transferred group. The KEGG and MetaCyc analysis further predicted the alteration of the glycosaminoglycan and chitin metabolisms in the gill bacteria. Collectively, the common glycosaminoglycan and chitin pathways in both the gill cells and gill microbiota suggest the host-bacterium interaction in gill facilitates the fresh water acclimation. IMPORTANCE This is the first study using the transcriptome and 16S rRNA gene sequencing to report the hypotonic responsive genes in gill cells and the compositions of gill microbiota in marine medaka. The overlapped glycosaminoglycan- and chitin-related pathways suggest host-bacterium interaction in fish gill during osmotic stress.Entities:
Keywords: RNA sequencingmetagenomics; gill; hypotonic stress; medaka; osmoregulation; osmosensing; osmotic stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35285678 PMCID: PMC9040874 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00047-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 7.324
FIG 1(A) Venn diagram showing the expressed gene between the seawater control and fresh water transferred gill samples. A total 25,903 transcripts were identified in which 24,704 transcripts were found in both groups. (B) Volcano plots of DEGs. DEGs identified in SW/FW; 568 upregulated DEGs and 466 downregulated DEGs were identified in the SW/FW group. Red points indicate the upregulated genes, while blue represents the downregulated genes. Nonsignificant transcripts were marked gray. (C) Significant DEGs in FW gill. Selected transporters are shown. The y axis presents the log2 fold change value.
FIG 2(A) GO classification of DEGs between groups. GO terms identified in SW/FW group. y axis shows the number of DEGs, and the x axis indicates the GO terms that were classified into biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. Red bars indicate the upregulated genes, while blue indicates the downregulated genes. (B) Directed acyclic graph (DAG) of the selected enriched BP terms. Chitin metabolic process was significantly enriched after fresh water transfer via amino sugar metabolism and aminoglycan metabolism. (C) Pathway functional enrichment of DEGs in SW/FW group. x axis represents the enrichment factor, while y axis indicates the enriched pathways. The color indicates the q value: the blue color represents the lower value, while the white color indicates the higher value. In addition, the point size indicates the number of DEGs. The greater the rich factor, the more significant the enrichment. Glycosaminoglycan and steroid biosynthesis were found to be enriched in the SW/FW group.
FIG 3(A) Venn diagram of the ASV detected in the gill of SW control group and the FW group. Different colors represent different groups; the intersection represents the set of ASV commonly present in the counterpart groups. Of the 399 ASV recognized (246 in SW, 196 in FW), 43 were found in common in SW and FW. (B) Various alpha diversity measurements of the two groups. Results indicated that the transfer of fish from SW to FW could lead to significant reduction of gill microbial diversity. (C) The network relationship among the two groups was obtained from Calypso analysis. Vibrio was mainly found in SW (red spot), while Pseudomonas was in FW (blue spot). Cetobacterium was found in both SW and FW. Tree diagram at the right bottom shows that the FW (blue spot) shares some microbiota with SW (red spot).
FIG 4(A) Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to show the microbiota communities under the two conditions. Distinct compositions were found in the control marine medaka (SW, red spot) and progressive-transfer medaka (FW, blue spot). (B) The microbiota community distribution at phylum level. Proteobacteria was mainly found in the samples. (C) The microbiota community distribution at genus level. Vibrio (pink spot) was mainly found in SW, while Pseudomonas (blue spot) was in FW. Cetobacterium (light green spot) was found in both SW and FW. (D) The relative abundance of selected gill bacteria at genus level. Vibrio was highly present in the SW gill. When the fish was transferred to fresh water (FW), Vibrio was reduced and Pseudomonas was increased. (E) PCoA of rearing water and gill samples. The SW (orange) and FW (green) gill microbiota were located apart from the seawater (yellow) and the fresh water (purple).
FIG 5(A) Comparison of microbiota at genus level between the gill of SW control group and the FW group. y axis shows the genus, and the x axis represents the log2 fold value. Vibrio was mainly found in SW, while Pseudomonas was dominant in FW gill. (B) Volcano plot of the microbiota. Red indicates the significant changes in abundances, while green refers to changes without statistical significance. SW was used as the reference. Vibrio was reduced (red underline) after the fresh water transfer, while Pseudomonas (green underline) increased its abundance. (C) KEGG bioinformatics analysis on the gill microbiota. Only the glycosaminoglycan degradation was enriched significantly in SW group. (D) MetaCyc analysis showed the 20 enriched pathways with significant changes. The bar plot shows mean proportions of differential MetaCyc pathways. The difference in proportions between the groups is shown with 95% confidence intervals. Methionine biosynthesis and chitin derivative degradation were identified that may play roles with the gill cell in osmoregulation.