Literature DB >> 35284955

Predictors of failure to achieve minimal clinical important difference for pain and disability after mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT)-based multimodal rehabilitation for neck pain: a retrospective analysis of 4998 patients.

Gautam M Shetty1, Palak Vakil2, Shikha Jain2, Garima Anandani2, C S Ram3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine predictors of failure to achieve minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for pain and disability at discharge after mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT)-based multimodal rehabilitation for neck pain (NP).
METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and neck disability index (NDI) in patients with mechanical NP were analysed in this retrospective study. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the effect of covariates such as age, gender, lifestyle, body mass index, presentation, diabetes, osteoporosis, response to repeated movement testing, treatment sessions, compliance rate, and pre-treatment NPRS and NDI scores on failure to achieve MCID of ≥ 30% for NPRS and NDI scores post-treatment.
RESULTS: In the 4998 patients analysed for this study, 7% and 14.5% of patients failed to achieve MCID for NPRS and NDI scores, respectively, at the end of treatment. Age > 70 years, diabetes, osteoporosis, partial or non-response to repeated movements, lesser treatment sessions, and lower compliance rate were associated with increased risk for failure to achieve MCID for NPRS and NDI scores. A higher pre-treatment NDI score was associated with failure to achieve MCID for NPRS score, whereas lower pre-treatment NPRS and NDI scores were associated with failure to achieve MCID for NDI score.
CONCLUSION: Although MDT-based multimodal rehabilitation helped to achieve significant reduction in pain and disability in mechanical NP, several baseline risk factors were associated with failure to achieve MCID for pain and disability after treatment. Identifying and modifying these factors as part of rehabilitation treatment may help to achieve better outcomes in mechanical NP.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical neck pain; Multimodal treatment; Physical therapy; Prognosis; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284955     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07167-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  26 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical diagnosis and therapy has similar effects on pain and disability as 'wait and see' and other approaches in people with neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takasaki; Stephen May
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 7.000

Review 2.  Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deokhoon Jun; Michaleff Zoe; Venerina Johnston; Shaun O'Leary
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; W Michael Hooten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-08-14

4.  Motor control using cranio-cervical flexion exercises versus other treatments for non-specific chronic neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Martin-Gomez; Rebeca Sestelo-Diaz; Victor Carrillo-Sanjuan; Marcos Jose Navarro-Santana; Judit Bardon-Romero; Gustavo Plaza-Manzano
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

Review 6.  The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

Authors:  Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Gabrielle van der Velde; Linda J Carroll; Lena W Holm; J David Cassidy; Jamie Guzman; Pierre Côté; Scott Haldeman; Carlo Ammendolia; Eugene Carragee; Eric Hurwitz; Margareta Nordin; Paul Peloso
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Treating Low Back Pain: Literature Review With Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olivier T Lam; David M Strenger; Matthew Chan-Fee; Paul Thuong Pham; Richard A Preuss; Shawn M Robbins
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Predicting a clinically important outcome in patients with low back pain following McKenzie therapy or spinal manipulation: a stratified analysis in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Robin Christensen; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Is a combined programme of manual therapy and exercise more effective than usual care in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucia Domingues; Fernando Manuel Pimentel-Santos; Eduardo Brazete Cruz; Ana Cristina Sousa; Ana Santos; Ana Cordovil; Anabela Correia; Laura Sa Torres; Antonio Silva; Pedro Soares Branco; Jaime Cunha Branco
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors:  Saeid Safiri; Ali-Asghar Kolahi; Damian Hoy; Rachelle Buchbinder; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Deepti Bettampadi; Ahad Ashrafi-Asgarabad; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Emma Smith; Mahdi Sepidarkish; Marita Cross; Mostafa Qorbani; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Anthony D Woolf; Lyn March; Gary Collins; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.