| Literature DB >> 35284854 |
Poonam Keshav1, Deepak Kumar Goyal1, Sukhbir Kaur1.
Abstract
In this study, we explored Cicer microphyllum (CM), a Trans-Himalayan plant for its chemical components by GC-MS, phytochemical quantitation, and anti-leishmanial efficacy against sensitive strain (SS) and resistant strain (RS) promastigotes of L. donovani in vitro. The hydroethanolic extract of aerial parts of CM was screened for the presence of chemical compounds and phytochemical estimation. The antileishmanial activity of CM was assessed against the promastigotes of L. donovani. The cell volume and cell viability were analyzed by flow cytometry. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid bodies was determined after treatment with reference and test drug. The extract of CM is complemented with major plant secondary metabolites and the quantitative assessment for phytoconstituents showed the highest concentration of phenols followed by flavonoids and terpenoids. Different biologically active chemical compounds were identified by the GC-MS analysis. The 50% inhibitory concentrations against L. donovani sensitive strain were 14.40 μg/ml and 23.03 μg/ml whereas for resistant promastigotes these were 49.84 μg/ml and 26.77 μg/ml after SAG (sodium stibogluconate) and CM exposure, respectively. CM treatment reduced cell viability induced by loss in plasma membrane integrity. Drug treatment resulted in higher ROS generation and production of lipid bodies. GC-MS screening of the extract revealed the richness of active chemical components in CM. The presence of diverse phytochemicals, no cytotoxicity to human macrophages, and the antileishmanial action of CM depicted its potential as an alternative future drug.Entities:
Keywords: Antileishmanial; Cicer microphyllum; GC-MS analysis; Leishmania donovani; Phytochemicals; SAG-Resistant strain; SAG-Sensitive strain
Year: 2021 PMID: 35284854 PMCID: PMC8906067 DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2021.100040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis ISSN: 2667-114X
Chemical compounds detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of Cicer microphyllum extract.
| No. | RT | Compound | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.25 | 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone, bis(trimethylsilyl) ether | 0.81 |
| 2 | 19.19 | Dibutyl phthalate | 2.91 |
| 3 | 22.88 | Heptasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13-tetradecamethyl | 2.75 |
| 4 | 24.37 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, 2,3-bis [(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-propyl ester, (Z,Z,Z) | 8.43 |
| 5 | 24.54 | Octasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13,15,15-hexadecamethyl | 2.48 |
| 6 | 25.86 | Squalene | 10.18 |
| 7 | 26.41 | Didodecyl phthalate | 47.84 |
| 8 | 26.58 | 13-docosenamide | 13.46 |
| 9 | 32.22 | Betulin | 6.96 |
| 10 | 33.26 | 3-desoxo-3,16-dihydroxy-12-desoxyphorbol 3,13,16,20-tetraacetate | 4.18 |
Abbreviations: No., serial number; RT, retention time.
Percentage of peak area.
Fig. 1Inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50 μg/ml) against promastigotes of L. donovani after 72 h of sodium stibogluconate (SAG) and Cicer microphyllum (CM) exposure. Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Key: UT, untreated; RS + SAG, resistant strain treated with sodium stibogluconate; RS + CM, resistant strain treated with C. microphyllum; SS + SAG, sensitive strain treated with sodium stibogluconate; SS + CM, sensitive strain treated with C. microphyllum.
Fig. 2Levels of ROS generation in L. donovani promastigotes after sodium stibogluconate (SAG) and Cicer microphyllum (CM) treatment. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Key: UT, untreated; RS + SAG, resistant strain treated with sodium stibogluconate; RS + CM, resistant strain treated with C. microphyllum; SS + SAG, sensitive strain treated with sodium stibogluconate; SS + CM, sensitive strain treated with C. microphyllum.
Fig. 3Cell volume analysis of L. donovani promastigotes treated with Cicer microphyllum (CM). Forward light scatter (FSC-A) corresponds to cell size. A Untreated (UT) vs resistant strain treated with sodium stibogluconate (RS + SAG). B UT vs resistant strain treated with C. microphyllum (RS + CM). C UT vs sensitive strain treated with sodium stibogluconate (SS + SAG). D UT vs sensitive strain treated with C. microphyllum (SS + CM). Red histogram: untreated, blue histogram: treated.
Fig. 4Cell viability analysis was performed via propidium iodide uptake assay by flow cytometry after treatment with Cicer microphyllum (CM). Histograms depicting the dead parasites (propidium iodide-positive, P2). A Untreated (UT). B Resistant strain treated with sodium stibogluconate (RS + SAG). C Resistant strain treated with C. microphyllum (RS + CM). D Sensitive strain treated with sodium stibogluconate (SS + SAG). E Sensitive strain treated with C. microphyllum (SS + CM). PE-A: phycoerythrin-area for excitation at 488 nm for propidium iodide.
Fig. 5Lipid bodies accumulation (Nile Red) in L. donovani promastigotes after treatment with Cicer microphyllum (CM). Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Key: UT, untreated; RS + SAG, resistant strain treated with sodium stibogluconate; RS + CM, resistant strain treated with C. microphyllum; SS + SAG, sensitive strain treated with sodium stibogluconate; SS + CM, sensitive strain treated with C. microphyllum.