Nanoencapsulation has emerged as a promising approach for the effective delivery of poorly aqueous soluble compounds. The current study focuses on the preparation of human serum albumin (HSA)-based nanoparticles (NPs) and poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based nanoparticles for effective delivery of the morin-Cu(II) complex. The NPs were analyzed based on different parameters such as particle size, surface charge, morphology, encapsulation efficiency, and in vitro release properties. The average particle sizes were found to be 214 ± 6 nm for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and 185 ± 7.5 nm for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs. The release of the morin-Cu(II) complex from both the NPs (Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) followed a biphasic behavior, which comprises an early burst release followed by a sustained and controlled release. The resulting NPs also exhibit free radical scavenging activity confirmed by a standard antioxidant assay. The antibacterial activities of the NPs were investigated using a disk diffusion technique, and it was observed that both the NPs showed better antibacterial activity than morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex. The anticancer activities of the prepared NPs were examined on MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell lines using a cytotoxicity assay, and the mode of cell death was visualized using fluorescence microscopy. Our results revealed that NPs kill the cancer cells with greater efficiency than free morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex. Thus, both HSA-based NPs and PLGA-based NPs can act as promising delivery systems for the morin-Cu(II) complex and can be utilized for further biomedical applications.
Nanoencapsulation has emerged as a promising approach for the effective delivery of poorly aqueous soluble compounds. The current study focuses on the preparation of human serum albumin (HSA)-based nanoparticles (NPs) and poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based nanoparticles for effective delivery of the morin-Cu(II) complex. The NPs were analyzed based on different parameters such as particle size, surface charge, morphology, encapsulation efficiency, and in vitro release properties. The average particle sizes were found to be 214 ± 6 nm for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and 185 ± 7.5 nm for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs. The release of the morin-Cu(II) complex from both the NPs (Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) followed a biphasic behavior, which comprises an early burst release followed by a sustained and controlled release. The resulting NPs also exhibit free radical scavenging activity confirmed by a standard antioxidant assay. The antibacterial activities of the NPs were investigated using a disk diffusion technique, and it was observed that both the NPs showed better antibacterial activity than morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex. The anticancer activities of the prepared NPs were examined on MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell lines using a cytotoxicity assay, and the mode of cell death was visualized using fluorescence microscopy. Our results revealed that NPs kill the cancer cells with greater efficiency than free morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex. Thus, both HSA-based NPs and PLGA-based NPs can act as promising delivery systems for the morin-Cu(II) complex and can be utilized for further biomedical applications.
Flavonoids, a group
of polyphenolic compounds, are abundantly found
in several fruits, vegetables, seeds, and herbs and possess various
biological activities including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and
anticarcinogenic activities.[1−3] Many flavonoids act as natural
chelators. The specific chemical scaffold comprising mainly carbonyl
and hydroxyl groups present in flavonoids makes it suitable for favorable
chelation with metal ions and forming flavonoid–metal complexes.
Flavonoid–metal complexes are utilized as colorimetric reagents
for the determination of metal ions.[4,5] Several studies
have corroborated that the antioxidant behavior of flavonoids is due
to their chelating properties. Flavonoid–metal chelates are
found to be more powerful free radical scavengers than the free flavonoids
and play a pivotal role in preventing radical generation and thus
providing protection from oxidative stress. They also exhibit higher
cytotoxic activity than the parent flavonoids. Furthermore, complexes
of flavonoids have an enormous impact in controlling metal bioavailability
and preventing metal toxicity. Among the several metal ions, copper
plays a key role in the formation of a reactive hydroxyl radical (HO)
through the Fenton and Haber–Weiss reactions. Due to the redox
nature of copper, it is involved in various biological processes including
regulation of hemoglobin level, embryonic development, mitochondrial
respiration, and physiological processes such as iron metabolism,
cellular respiration, free radical detoxification, etc.[6−8] Copper is also an important cofactor in several metabolic pathways.
Plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria on agricultural crops can be controlled
by using copper-containing compounds like copper sulfate, Bordeaux
mixtures, etc. The toxicity of copper can be reduced by coordination
of copper with natural chelating agents.Morin hydrate (3,5,7,2′,4′-pentahydroxyflavone)
is
a flavonol (Figure ), which belongs to the flavonoid group. It is mainly present in
guava leaves, onion, red wine, herbs, fruit, and other Moraceae.[9−11] Morin is also used as a food preservative. It is extensively used
as a probe for metal ion detection and detection of other biomacromolecules
like nucleic acids, proteins,[12] etc. It
has been reported that coordination of flavonoids like quercetin and
morin with metals such as Cu(II) enhances the pharmaceutical activity
of drugs and also diminishes their toxic effects.[13] Coordination of morin with Cu(II), Pt(II), La(III), and
Gd(III) showed stronger antioxidant activity than morin alone. Because
of the antioxidant nature of morin complexes, it also showed stronger
inhibition property against three strains of bacteria, e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Staphylococcus aureus.(14)
Figure 1
Molecular structure of
morin.
Molecular structure of
morin.Due to the interesting properties
of both morin and copper, we
have synthesized the morin-Cu(II) complex in our present work. However,
one of the major limitations of the morin-Cu(II) complex is its low
aqueous solubility, which restricts its applications in clinical and
biopharmaceutical fields. To overcome this shortcoming, we have prepared
nanoparticles of the morin-Cu(II) complex to check the stabilization
and solubilization, which in turn is expected to improve its therapeutic
efficacy. The past few years have seen a rise in the usage of nanoparticles
as drug delivery systems due to their widespread applications in pharmaceutical
and biomedical fields. Researchers have found interest in designing
nanoparticles because of their unique properties including chemical,
mechanical, electrical, optical, magnetic, electro-optical, and magneto-optical
properties. All these properties make the nanoparticles useful in
the field of biomedical applications particularly as delivery systems
and in imaging. Ongoing research is being carried out to attempt new
formulations that are able to deliver drugs to specific target areas
of the body. Herein, we choose a nanoencapsulation technique for improving
the solubility and delivering this poorly aqueous soluble compound,
the principle of which may be adopted for other such similar compounds/drugs
as well. A proper selection of matrix is vital in this regard to obtain
a better nanoparticulate delivery system. Several matrices such as
proteins, polysaccharides, polymers, and liposomes have been already
exploited by researchers because of their numerous advantages, which
make them suitable drug delivery vehicles.[15−17] In our present
study, we have chosen two different carriers, human serum albumin
(HSA) and poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), to
synthesize nanoparticles. HSA was chosen as the matrix for nanoparticle
formation owing to its easy availability, biocompatible nature, biodegradability,
lack of toxicity, reproducibility, and non-antigenicity. PLGA has
also been used by several researchers as a carrier in the preparation
of nanoparticles. As PLGA is biodegradable, biocompatible, and non-toxic,
we have also chosen PLGA as one of the components of our matrix. Hydrolysis
of PLGA leads to the formation of natural biodegradable metabolites
(lactic acid and glycolic acid), which can be easily metabolized in
our body via Krebs cycle and eliminated from our
body as carbon dioxide and water. Both HSA and PLGA have been accepted
by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicine Agency
for human use.In this context, this work is aimed at the preparation
of nanoparticles
of the morin-Cu(II) complex using two different matrices. The complex
was prepared and characterized by standard spectroscopic techniques.
The nanoparticles of the morin-Cu(II) complex were then prepared using
a desolvation technique (HSA matrix) and an S/O/W emulsification technique
(PLGA matrix). Characterization of the nanoparticles involved surface
morphology and size distribution measurements. Encapsulation efficiency
and release properties in vitro were also tested
in this study. The antioxidant activity of the nanoparticles was determined
using a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay. The toxicity of
the nanoparticles was checked using a hemolytic assay. Further, the
antibacterial activities of the NPs were determined using a disk diffusion
technique and the efficacy of nanoparticles toward breast cancer cell
lines was evaluated. The present findings add to the knowledge of
drug delivery applications and could be further explored to aid in
the design of novel effective drug delivery vehicles.
Results and Discussion
Nanocarriers have been designed to improve the solubility and bioavailability
of many drugs that suffer from poor aqueous solubility. In our present
study, we have used two different matrices, HSA and PLGA, to prepare
the NPs in order to increase the solubility of the morin-Cu(II) complex.
Determination
of Stoichiometric Ratio: Job’s Plot
Prior to the preparation
of the morin-Cu(II) complex, the stoichiometric
ratio between Cu(II) and morin was determined according to Job’s
continual variation method.[18] The absorbance
at 420 nm (λmax) was plotted against the mole fraction
of the Cu(II) ion (Figure ). The graph indicated that the molar ratio involved in the
formation of the morin-Cu(II) complex is 2:1.
Figure 2
(a) UV–vis absorption
spectra of morin in the presence of
Cu(II) ion in HPLC-grade ethanol. Job’s continual variation
methods applied for the complexation between morin and Cu(II) ion.
Metal-to-ligand molar ratios varying from 1:7 to 7:1 in ethanol. (b)
Corresponding Job’s plot indicating 2:1 morin to Cu(II) complexation.
(a) UV–vis absorption
spectra of morin in the presence of
Cu(II) ion in HPLC-grade ethanol. Job’s continual variation
methods applied for the complexation between morin and Cu(II) ion.
Metal-to-ligand molar ratios varying from 1:7 to 7:1 in ethanol. (b)
Corresponding Job’s plot indicating 2:1 morin to Cu(II) complexation.
Synthesis and Characterization of the Morin-Cu(II)
Complex
The morin-Cu(II) complex was synthesized using a
previous method
resulting in the formation of a dark-chocolate-colored compound.[43] A schematic representation of the complexation
of morin with Cu(OAc)2·H2O is shown in Figure . Elemental analysis
shows % C = 51.25 and % H = 3.29, whereas the theoretical values are
% C = 51.33 and % H = 3.16. The calculated atomic mass for [CuC30H22O16] is 701.0304, and the mass obtained
from MALDI-TOF spectra (Figure a) is found to be m/z 701.12.
This result is in agreement with the proposed structure of the copper
complex. UV–vis spectra show two distinct bands of morin at
351 nm (band I) and 264 nm (band II) due to the cinnamoyl moiety and
the benzoyl moieties, respectively. The formation of the morin-Cu(II)
complex results in a bathochromic shift of band I (Figure b). The increase in conjugation
in the complex results in this distinct shift, which further indicates
that the 2′-OH group of ring B is involved in the formation
of the morin-Cu(II) complex.[43] The complex
formation has also been characterized using FTIR spectroscopy (Figure c,d), and the wavenumbers
of the bands of morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex are shown in Table .
Figure 3
Schematic representation
of the complexation of morin with Cu(OAc)2·H2O.
Figure 4
(a) MALDI-TOF spectra of morin-Cu(II) complex.
(b) UV–vis
absorption spectra of morin and morin-Cu(II) complex. FTIR spectra
of (c) morin and (d) morin-Cu(II) complex
Table 1
Assignment of the Main IR Bands of
Morin and Morin-Cu(II) Complex
bands (cm–1)
morin
morin-Cu(II) complex
νC=O
1661 (s)
1649 (s)
νC–O–C
1253 (s)
1230
(s)
νM–O
526 (s)
νC2′–OH
1308 (s)
1358 (s)
νO–H
3375 (b)
3372 (b)
Schematic representation
of the complexation of morin with Cu(OAc)2·H2O.(a) MALDI-TOF spectra of morin-Cu(II) complex.
(b) UV–vis
absorption spectra of morin and morin-Cu(II) complex. FTIR spectra
of (c) morin and (d) morin-Cu(II) complexThe formation of the morin-Cu(II) complex results in an increase
in the stretching frequency of the C–O–H mode from 1308
to 1360 cm–1, which indicates that the ortho-phenolic
moiety on the B ring of morin is involved in chelation with the Cu(II)
ion.[19] In the morin-Cu(II) complex, the
Cu–O stretching vibration appears at 526 cm–1, whereas no such band appears in the case of morin alone, which
confirms the formation of the metal complex. Further, a noticeable
decrease of 23 cm–1 in the C–O–C stretching
frequency of the morin-Cu(II) complex was observed, which implies
the participation of oxygen of the C ring during complex formation.[20] A broad band in the range 3450–3064 cm–1 appears due to the O–H stretching frequency,
which indicates the presence of water molecules in the complex. The
energy optimized structure of the morin-Cu(II) complex is given in Figure .
Figure 5
Energy-optimized structure
of the morin-Cu(II) complex.
Energy-optimized structure
of the morin-Cu(II) complex.
Preparation and Characterization of NPs
HSA-based NPs were
prepared using a desolvation technique, whereas
PLGA-based NPs were prepared using an S/O/W emulsification technique.
The desolvation technique involves ethanol addition, which causes
phase separation. Due to the desolvating nature of ethanol, it decreases
the solubility of HSA in water and promotes the aggregation of the
protein molecules in the aqueous phase. Glutaraldehyde, a cross-linking
agent, was also added to the solution, which imparts stability to
the NPs. The S/O/W emulsification technique involves addition of an
oil phase into a water phase where the morin-Cu(II) complex and PLGA
in acetone were used as the oil phase and PVA solution used as the
water phase.
Spectroscopic Characterization
UV–vis
Spectroscopy
To observe the change in
spectral properties of the morin-Cu(II) complex after encapsulation
into the two different matrices (HSA and PLGA), a UV–vis study
was performed. Figure shows the UV–vis spectra of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
The existence of both peaks of the morin-Cu(II) complex in the HSA
and PLGA NPs indicates that the chemical structure of the morin-Cu(II)
complex does not alter after encapsulation into the matrices.
Figure 6
UV–vis
absorption spectra of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
UV–vis
absorption spectra of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
FTIR Study
The interaction between the morin-Cu(II)
complex and the matrix (HSA and PLGA) was investigated by an FTIR
analysis. For HSA, the amide I and amide II bands appear at 1654 and
1550 cm–1, respectively. The amide I band is due
to the C=O stretching frequency, whereas the amide II band
is due to the C–N stretching coupled with N–H bending.
For PLGA, the band at 1757 cm–1 is due to the C=O
stretching frequency and the bands at 1044 and 1248 cm–1 involve the C–O stretching frequency. FTIR results of morin
and the morin-Cu(II) complex are in Table . The FTIR spectra of NPs are presented in Figure where the spectra
of both Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs contain the characteristic
bands of the morin-Cu(II) complex with a slight shift. The νC2′–OH of the morin-Cu(II) complex shifts from
1358 to 1362 cm–1 (for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs) and 1365
cm–1 (for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs), whereas νC–O–C of the morin-Cu(II) complex shifts from
1230 to 1232 cm–1 (for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs) and 1236
cm–1 (for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs). Further, νCu–O of the morin-Cu(II) complex shifts from 526 to
524 cm–1 (for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs) and 530 cm–1 (for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs). Our results are also an indication of the
superposition of the matrix (HSA and PLGA) and the morin-Cu(II) complex,
which implies that the morin-Cu(II) complex is entrapped within the
matrix (HSA and PLGA) without affecting its chemical structure. This
observation is in accordance with previous literature reports.[21,22] Similar types of results have already been shown from this laboratory,[23−25] and the present findings are consistent with the earlier studies.
Figure 7
FTIR Spectra
of (a) HSA, (b) PLGA, (c) Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, and (d)
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
FTIR Spectra
of (a) HSA, (b) PLGA, (c) Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, and (d)
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
Morphological Characterization
and Determination of Sizes and
Surface Charge
Field emission scanning electron microscopy
(FESEM) was used for morphological characterization of the nanoparticles.
FESEM images display almost a uniform and spherical type morphology
of the prepared NPs with a smooth surface (Figure ). The surface topography of the prepared
NPs was also investigated by AFM analyses. As shown in Figure , we have observed a smooth
spherical appearance of NPs, which confirms the observation obtained
from the FESEM results.
Figure 8
FESEM images of (a) HSA NPs, (b) Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs,
(c) PLGA NPs,
and (d) Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
Figure 9
AFM images of (a) HSA
NPs, (b) Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, (c) PLGA NPs, and
(d) Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
FESEM images of (a) HSA NPs, (b) Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs,
(c) PLGA NPs,
and (d) Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.AFM images of (a) HSA
NPs, (b) Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, (c) PLGA NPs, and
(d) Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.Particle size in addition
to size distributions play a critical
role in physicochemical properties of nanoparticle systems such as
drug loading and release properties, stability, etc.[26] Cellular uptake properties as well as bioavailability of
drugs are also influenced by the sizes of the particles. Thus, it
is important to control the size of the particles. In a desolvation
technique, several parameters such as pH and percentage of ethanol
addition influence the sizes of the particles. Acidic pH results in
the formation of larger particles, while an increase in pH value decreases
the particle sizes. In our present work, we have prepared the NPs
using a pH value of 8.5. The increase in the percentage of ethanol
results in a gradual decrease in the particle size. In the present
study, we have obtained the NPs using 70% ethanol. In the solid in
oil in water (S/O/W) emulsification technique, the PLGA content, surfactant
content, aqueous-to-organic phase volume ratio, etc. affect the particle
sizes. Previous reports indicate that the particles with average sizes
around 300 nm or smaller than 300 nm can be easily delivered to the
target site through the human body. The size distribution profile
(DLS profile) is shown in Figure S1 of
the Supporting Information. The results (Table ) showed that the average sizes of the particles
are ∼214 ± 6 nm for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and ∼185 ±
7.5 nm for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
Table 2
Average Sizes, Polydispersity
Index,
and Zeta Potential Values of Different Samples
sample
average sizes (nm)
polydispersity index
zeta
potential (mV)
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs
214 ± 6
0.521
–23.4
± 0.9
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
185 ± 7.5
0.454
–27.2 ± 1.1
Further, the
surface charge of the NPs was determined by zeta potential
measurements. The zeta potential is a crucial factor for estimating
the stability of the colloidal dispersion.[27] The magnitude of zeta potential indicates the repulsive force present
in the colloidal nanoparticle dispersion. It has been observed that
particles having a zeta potential value above ±30 mV are stable
because of the electric repulsion between the particles.[28] From zeta potential measurements (Table ), we have observed that the
surface charge of both the NPs is negative. The average zeta potential
value of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs is found to be −23.4 ± 0.9 mV
and that of Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs is −27.2 ± 1.1 mV, which indicates
an overall higher stability of the NPs. Zeta potential distribution
of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs are shown in Figure S2.
Encapsulation Efficiency
To calculate
the encapsulation
efficiency of the morin-Cu(II) complex in HSA-based NPs and PLGA-based
NPs, both the NPs were centrifuged and the absorbance of the supernatant
was recorded using UV–vis spectroscopy. Our study showed ∼87%
encapsulation efficiency for HSA-based NPs and 82% encapsulation efficiency
for PLGA-based NPs.
In Vitro Release Study
There are several
factors that influence the drug release rate. These factors include
solubility of drug, diffusion through the matrix, erosion of the matrix,
desorption from the adsorbed drug, etc. In our present study, the
release of the morin-Cu(II) complex from HSA-based NPs and PLGA-based
NPs was carried out using a dialysis technique over a period of 96
h. As shown in Figure , the release of the morin-Cu(II) complex from both HSA-based and
PLGA-based NPs followed a biphasic release pattern. The biphasic release
pattern comprises a burst release in the initial period followed by
a slow and sustained release. The burst release in the initial period
may be because of the small amount of the morin-Cu(II) complex adsorbed
on the surface of the matrix, which results in the faster release
in the initial stage. However, the morin-Cu(II) complex entrapped
within the NPs causes slow and sustained release. The drug release
profiles in PBS (pH 7.4) shown in Figure a indicate that the total release at the
end of 96 h is found to be ∼71% for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and ∼75%
for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs. In addition, the release of the morin-Cu(II)
complex has been monitored in an acidic pH medium (pH 6.5) under extracellular
tumoral conditions. The total release at the end of 96 h is found
to be ∼82% for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and ∼86% for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
(Figure b).
Figure 10
In
vitro release profile of the morin-Cu(II) complex
from Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs at (a) pH 7.4 and (b) pH 6.5.
In
vitro release profile of the morin-Cu(II) complex
from Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs at (a) pH 7.4 and (b) pH 6.5.
Antioxidant Activity
The DPPH assay
is a widely used
technique for determining the antioxidant potential of any compound.
DPPH is a nitrogen-centered stable free radical showing a maximum
absorbance at 517 nm. Morin is well-known for its antioxidant property,
and the antioxidant potential is due to its hydrogen-donating ability.
Generally, the molecular structure and different spatial arrangement
of hydroxyl groups regulate the antioxidant potential of polyphenols.
An important feature of morin that is responsible for its antioxidant
capacity is the presence of 3-OH groups attached to the 2,3-double
bond and adjacent to the 4-carbonyl group in the C ring (Figure ). In addition, the
presence of both 3-OH and 5-OH groups along with the 4-carbonyl group
in morin results in the formation of a catechol-like moiety in the
C ring through intramolecular rearrangement. This is also an important
criterion for its higher antioxidant capacity. When the prepared NPs
(Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) were treated with DPPH solution,
the purple color of DPPH turns pale yellow, which is an indication
of the antioxidant potential of the NPs. Our findings reveal that
the percentage of inhibition of DPPH by Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs is ∼79%
and that of Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs is ∼83%. The associated histogram
of the percentage of inhibition is presented in Figure .
Figure 11
Histogram of percentage
of inhibition of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
Histogram of percentage
of inhibition of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
Hemolytic Assay
A hemolytic assay was performed to
confirm whether the prepared NPs are toxic toward RBCs. Hemolysis
is the process of rupturing of red blood cells, which allows hemoglobin
to be released into the blood plasma. Hemolysis is responsible for
several pathological conditions such as anemia, jaundice, renal toxicity,
hypertension, etc.[29] For the use of NPs
particularly in clinical applications, it is important to consider
their hemolytic properties. According to ISO/TR 7405-1984(f), the
samples are treated as non-hemolytic if the hemolytic percentage is
found to be less than 5%. Samples having hemolytic values in between
5 and 10% are considered as slightly hemolytic, while the values higher
than 10% are highly hemolytic. In our case, we have observed a hemolytic
value of ∼1.4% for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and ∼0.9% for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs,
indicating the non-hemolytic properties of both the NPs (Table ). The non-toxic nature
of both the NPs toward RBCs makes the NPs applicable for further biomedical
investigations.
Table 3
Hemolytic Rate of Different Samples
sample
hemolytic percentage
morin-Cu(II) complex
2.5
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs
1.4
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
0.9
Antibacterial
Activity
The antibacterial activities
of both the NPs (Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) were evaluated
by a disk diffusion technique using Staphylococcus
aureus as the test bacteria. In our current study, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was chosen as the model bacteria for analyzing the potential of
prepared nanoparticles on microbial organisms as it is the most significant
bacteria and responsible for several infections, skin diseases, nosocomial
infections, and food poisoning and are internalized in phagocytic
cells. Figure shows
the disk diffusion test results of morin, morin-Cu(II) complex, Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs,
and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs. The inhibitory zone was found to be 29 mm for
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and 42 mm for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs (Table ). The inhibition zones of nanoparticles
are found to be increased compared to morin and morin-Cu(II) complex.
The results indicated that the NPs were more effective than morin
and morin-Cu(II) complex against S. aureus. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of morin-Cu(II) complex,
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs were observed at 15, 12, and 5
μg/mL, respectively. We have also analyzed the effect of HSA,
PLGA, HSA NPs, and PLGA NPs against the test bacteria, and the results
revealed that they did not show any antibacterial effect. The better
antibacterial activity of the NPs compared to morin and morin-Cu(II)
complex is most likely due to the better ability of the nanoparticles
to transport and internalize higher concentrations of the complex
in micro-organisms and cells.
Figure 12
Inhibition zones of S.
aureus in
plates containing morin, morin-Cu(II) complex, Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, and
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
Table 4
Quantitative
Values of Inhibitory
Zone against S. aureus and MIC of the
Samples
sample
diameter of inhibitory zone (mm)
MIC (μg/mL)
morin-Cu(II) complex
20 ± 0.8
15
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs
29 ± 1.5
12
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
42 ± 2.0
5
Inhibition zones of S.
aureus in
plates containing morin, morin-Cu(II) complex, Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, and
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
Cytotoxicity Assay
Flavonoids are
well-known for their
anticancer activities. They have shown cytotoxic activity toward different
cancer cell lines. A number of flavonoids such as quercetin,[30] fisetin,[31] apigenin,[32] genistein,[33] and
luteolin[34] have been found to possess anticancer
activity. The anticancer activity of flavonoids depends on several
factors like structures, concentrations, and types of cell lines used.
According to “Lipinski’s rule of five”,[35] if a compound contains less than five hydrogen
donor sites and 10 acceptor sites, the molecular weight is less than
500 Da, and the log P value is under 5, then the
compounds have drug likeliness properties. In the case of morin, the
molecular weight is less than 500 Da. It has less than five hydrogen
donor sites and 10 acceptor sites, and the log P value
is under 5. This implies the existence of a drug likeliness property
of morin as proposed by Lipinski’s rule of five. Morin is also
found to inhibit the growth of human oral squamous carcinoma cells,[36] human promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60),[37] etc. The chemo-preventive activity of morin
against rat tongue carcinogenesis in vitro and in vivo has also been investigated.[38] Furthermore, flavonoid metal complexes like morin,[39] quercetin,[40] and chrysin[41] are found to exhibit relatively higher cytotoxic
activity than the flavonoids alone. However, the therapeutic applications
of flavonoids and flavonoid metal complexes are limited by their poor
water solubility and low bioavailability. In the present study, we
have investigated the cytotoxicity of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
by treating MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells with different concentrations
of NPs. Results from MTT assay showed that both the NPs (Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs
and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) are able to inhibit the cancer cell growth more
significantly than morin and morin-Cu(II) complex. After encapsulation
of the morin-Cu(II) complex into HSA-based NPs and PLGA-based NPs,
the nanoparticles are able to transport and internalize higher concentrations
of complex in microorganisms and cells. Thus, the NPs kill the cancer
cells more effectively than morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex. From
the results (Figure ), it is evident that for MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells, the cell
viability was 44% for Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and 30% for Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs.
We could not acquire normal breast cells for our study because of
ethical constraints. Thus, we are not able to perform cytotoxicity
tests on normal breast cells. However, we have carried out the MTT
assay on normal endometrial stromal cells. Our findings suggest that
treatment of normal endometrial stromal cells with both the NPs (Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs
and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) resulted in a cell viability of around 75%. It
can be concluded that Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs exhibit greater
potency in their cytotoxic activity toward breast cancer cells with
minimal or negligible effect on normal cells. From the above results,
it can be further confirmed that PLGA-based NPs act as a better matrix
for delivery of the morin-Cu(II) complex than HSA-based NPs.
Figure 13
Cell viability
plot of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs on (a)
normal endometrial stromal cells and (b) MDA-MB-468 breast cancer
cell line. (c) Histogram of cell viability of NP-treated endometrial
cells and breast cancer cells at 250 μg/mL conc. of NPs.
Cell viability
plot of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs on (a)
normal endometrial stromal cells and (b) MDA-MB-468 breast cancer
cell line. (c) Histogram of cell viability of NP-treated endometrial
cells and breast cancer cells at 250 μg/mL conc. of NPs.
Morphological Changes under a Microscope
To monitor
the morphological changes in Mor-Cu-HSA-NP- and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NP-treated
breast cancer cells, the cells were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy
(Figure ). Untreated
cells retain their regular morphology when visualized under a fluorescence
microscope. The green color indicates the presence of viable cells,
whereas a red color is the indication of dead cells. When the treated
cancer cells were taken under the fluorescence microscope, a change
in the morphology of the cells occurs, which results in cellular shrinkage.
We have also noted the presence of more dead cells in the case of
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs than in the morin and the morin-Cu(II)
complex alone. This observation is in agreement with the cytotoxicity
results.
Figure 14
Fluorescence microscopy images of AO/EB dual straining of (a) untreated,
(b) morin-, (c) morin-Cu(II) complex-, (d) Mor-Cu-HSA-NP-, and (e)
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NP-treated MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells after 24 h of
treatment
Fluorescence microscopy images of AO/EB dual straining of (a) untreated,
(b) morin-, (c) morin-Cu(II) complex-, (d) Mor-Cu-HSA-NP-, and (e)
Mor-Cu-PLGA-NP-treated MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells after 24 h of
treatment
Conclusions
HSA-based
and PLGA-based NPs have been fabricated for effective
delivery of the morin-Cu(II) complex. Using a desolvation technique,
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs have been prepared and an S/O/W emulsification technique
was used to obtain Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs. Each of them possesses a spherical
morphology and good encapsulation efficiency. The high negative zeta
potential value of both the NPs indicates that they are sufficiently
stable. The drug release profile shows a burst release in the initial
period with a subsequent slow and sustained release. The non-toxic
nature of both the NPs toward RBCs has also been confirmed by a hemolytic
assay. An antibacterial test indicated better antibacterial activity
of the Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs in comparison with the Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs. Both
the NPs showed significant cytotoxic effects on MDA-MB-468 breast
cancer cell lines; only 44% cells were viable when treated with Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs,
and 30% cells were viable when treated with Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs. This
implies that the PLGA-based NPs act as a better matrix than HSA-based
NPs for effective delivery of the morin-Cu(II) complex. The mode of
cell death was further monitored using fluorescence microscopy, and
significantly more dead cells were observed in the case of NPs compared
to free morin and the morin-Cu(II) complex. These results indicate
that both HSA-based and PLGA-based nanoparticle systems could provide
a promising therapeutic future for the morin-Cu(II) complex.
Materials
and Methods
Materials
Morin hydrate, copper acetate, PLGA (poly
lactic-co-glycolic acid), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA),
human serum albumin (HSA), and DPPH were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Co. (St. Louis, USA). Dialysis bags (average flat width: 25 mm) used
for in vitro release studies are made of cellulose
membrane and were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The other chemicals
used in these experiments were of analytical grade. The organic solvents
were of HPLC grade and used as received. Milli-Q-grade water was used
throughout the experiments. For cell culture studies, MDA-MB-468 breast
cancer cell lines were obtained from NCCS, Pune, India. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide) and DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Co. (St. Louis, USA). DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum was obtained from HIMEDIA
(Mumbai, India). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere.
Determination of Stoichiometric
Ratio of the Metal and Ligand
in the Complex
Job’s continual variation method[42] has been applied for the determination of the
stoichiometry of metal to ligand during the complexation of morin
with Cu(II) in HPLC-grade ethanol. The metal-to-ligand ratio was determined
by mixing both the components of equimolar concentration (1 mM) in
different ratios from 1:7 to 7:1. The absorbance values were recorded
at 420 nm. To determine the stoichiometric ratio between Cu(II) and
morin, the absorbance at 420 nm (λmax) was plotted
against the mole fraction of Cu(II) ion. The breakpoint in the graph
corresponds to the metal-to-morin ratio.
Synthesis of the Morin-Cu(II)
Complex
The morin-Cu(II)
complex was synthesized according to a previous literature report.[43] Typically, the ethanolic solution of morin (0.3
g, 9.92 × 10–4 mol) was taken in a 50 mL round-bottomed
flask and stirred at room temperature until it completely dissolved.
Solid Cu(OAc)2·H2O (0.1 g, 4.96 ×
10–4 mol) was added to the clear brownish morin
solution. The mixture was kept at room temperature, and stirring was
continued for 2 h. Finally, a dark brown precipitate was formed and
the reaction mixture was then filtered. The precipitate was washed
with a 1:3 ethanol:H2O mixture and kept in a vacuum desiccator
to obtain the powdered form of the complex.
Characterization of the
Morin-Cu(II) Complex
Elemental Analysis
The CHN data
was obtained from a
Perkin Elmer CHN Analyzer instrument.
UV–vis Spectroscopy
UV–vis spectroscopy
(UV-1800, Shimadzu) was used to initially characterize the morin-Cu(II)
complex. UV–vis studies were performed at 25 °C in the
range 200–600 nm.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
Study
FTIR spectra of the morin-Cu(II) complex were obtained
on a Spectrum
BX FTIR (Perkin Elmer) equipped with a lithium tantalate (LiTaO3) detector and a KBr beam splitter at room temperature. The
resolution used was 4 cm–1, and the scanning range
was from 4000 to 400 cm–1.
Preparation of Morin-Cu(II)
Complex-Loaded HSA NPs
The morin-Cu(II) complex-loaded HSA
NPs were prepared using a desolvation
technique.[17,44] Briefly, 20 mg of the morin-Cu(II)
complex was incubated with 100 mg of HSA in 2.5 mL of 10 mM NaCl for
4 h at room temperature. The pH of the solution mixture was then adjusted
to 8.5 by addition of NaOH. Nanoparticles were obtained by the addition
of the desolvating agent ethanol drop by drop (1 mL/min) under magnetic
stirring until the solution just became opaque. Then, 120 μL
of 8% (v/v) glutaraldehyde was added to the mixture to stabilize the
nanoparticles. The cross-linking was performed for 24 h at room temperature
under constant stirring. Finally, the nanoparticles obtained were
purified by centrifuging the NPs at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. The pellet
was then redispersed in 10 mM NaCl in an ultrasonication bath (Oscar
Ultrasonic Cleaner, Microclean-101). HSA NPs were prepared using the
same approach. The NPs were then freeze-dried to obtain the powdered
form. An EYELA FDU-1200 desktop-type freeze dryer equipped with a
refrigerator and a vacuum pump has been used to lyophilize the NPs.
The temperature and pressure were kept at −45 °C and <50
Pa, respectively.
Preparation of Morin-Cu(II) Complex-Loaded
PLGA NPs
The morin-Cu(II) complex-loaded PLGA NPs were formed
using a solid
in oil in water (S/O/W) emulsification technique[45] with minor modifications. In this process, 50 mg of PLGA
was dissolved in 1.5 mL of acetone. Ten milligrams of the morin-Cu(II)
complex was then incubated with PLGA solution for 2 h at room temperature.
After the incubation, the mixture was allowed to sonicate for 2 min
in a bath sonicator (Oscar Ultrasonic Cleaner, Microclean-101). The
morin-Cu(II) complex and PLGA in acetone were used as the organic
phase, and PVA solution was used as the aqueous phase. The organic
phase was then added dropwise to 3 mL of aqueous phase under magnetic
stirring. The mixture was allowed to be kept under stirring conditions
for 24 h. The NPs formed were then centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15
min. The supernatant was then discarded, and the pellet was washed
with Milli-Q water. The washing procedure was repeated three times.
PLGA nanoparticles were also prepared using a similar technique.
Characterization of NPs
Morin-Cu(II)
complex-loaded
HSA NPs and morin-Cu(II) complex-loaded PLGA NPs were characterized
using UV–vis spectroscopy (UV-1800, Shimadzu). The measurement
was done at 25 °C in a quartz cuvette of 1 cm path length. The
scanning range was 200–600 nm.
Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (FTIR) Study
FTIR spectra of NPs were recorded
on a Spectrum BX FTIR (Perkin Elmer)
equipped with a lithium tantalate (LiTaO3) detector and
a KBr beam splitter at room temperature. The spectra were collected
in the scanning range 4000–400 cm–1 with
a resolution of 4 cm–1.
Field Emission Scanning
Electron Microscopy (FESEM)
The morphological features of
the nanoparticles were observed using
FESEM. One droplet of the sample was applied on a cleaned glass piece
and air dried. The dried samples were then coated with gold and scanned
under a Carl Zeiss field emission electron microscope operating at
a voltage 5 kV.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
The
topography of the
nanoparticles was examined using AFM. The sample solutions were drop
casted on a freshly cleaved mica foil and then allowed to dry in air.
The images were obtained from AFM, model 5500, Agilent Technologies
in tapping mode using a silicon probe cantilever of 215–235
μm length, a resonance frequency of 146–236 kHz, and
a force constant of 21–98 N/m.
Determination of Particle
Sizes: Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)
Study
To determine the mean particle sizes of the nanoparticles,
DLS measurements were performed using a Malvern Nano ZS instrument
employing a 4 mW He–Ne laser (λ = 632 nm), with a scattering
angle of 173°. For the measurement, lyophilized nanoparticles
were suspended in water and sonicated for 2 min to obtain a homogeneous
solution, and the average particle sizes were evaluated.
Determination
of Surface Charge: Zeta Potential Measurement
The surface
charge of NPs was measured by means of zeta potential
measurements by using a Malvern ZetaSizer Nano ZS instrument. Measurements
were carried out at a scattering angle of 173° at 25 °C.
The data presented here is the average of three independent readings.
Encapsulation Efficiency
The amount of the morin-Cu(II)
complex entrapped in both the nanoparticles was measured using a UV–vis
spectrophotometer (UV 1800, Shimadzu). Morin-Cu(II) content in both
the NPs was determined by centrifuging each NP at 10,000 rpm followed
by taking the absorbance of the supernatant at 420 nm (absorption
maxima of the morin-Cu(II) complex). A standard calibration curve
of concentration vs absorbance was plotted for each case. The encapsulation
efficiency was calculated using the formula shown below:where W is
the amount of the morin-Cu(II) complex initially added and w is the amount of the morin-Cu(II) complex present in the
supernatant.
In Vitro Release Study
The amount
of the morin-Cu(II) complex released from Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
was quantified using a dialysis method. The experiment was performed
by dispersing 6.1 mg of lyophilized NPs in 500 μL of phosphate
buffer saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) and phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and further
placed in a dialysis bag (molecular weight cutoff of 12.6 kDa). The
dialysis bag was then immersed in 5 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) and phosphate
buffer (pH 6.5) separately and stirred continuously. One milliliter
of aliquots was collected at pre-fixed time intervals and replaced
with the same amount of buffer. The amount of released morin-Cu(II)
complex was calculated by taking the absorbance at 420 nm using UV–vis
spectroscopy (UV 1800, Shimadzu).
Determination of Antioxidant
Activity: DPPH Assay
To
determine the antioxidant activity of the prepared NPs, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
(DPPH) assay was performed following the method described earlier.[46] For this assay, 1 mM
stock DPPH solution was freshly prepared by dissolving DDPH in methanol.
The Eppendorf tube was covered with aluminum foil to protect it from
sunlight. Then, 100 μM DPPH solution was incubated with different
concentrations of the morin, morin-Cu(II) complex, Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs, and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs and allowed
to incubate for 30 min in the dark. The scavenging activity was estimated
by recording the absorbance at 517 nm. The DPPH solution without sample
was treated as the control, and ascorbic acid was taken as the standard.
The percentage inhibition of DPPH was calculated according to the
following equation:where A517control and A517sample represent the absorbance of the control and sample at 517 nm, respectively.
Hemolytic Assay
A hemolytic assay was carried out to
check the toxicity of the NPs.[47] In this
study, fresh blood was centrifuged at 3600 rpm for 10 min. The pellet
was then washed with PBS (pH 7.4), and the washing continued till
the red blood cells (RBCs) were separated from the plasma and buffy
coat. The NPs were then allowed to incubate with RBC suspensions (1%
hematocrit) for 40 min at 37 °C. After the incubation, the sample
mixtures were centrifuged at 3600 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance value
of the supernatant was measured at 540 nm (the absorption maxima of
hemoglobin), and the hemolytic percentage was calculated using the
formula shown below:where, Asample, Anegative control,
and Apositive control represent the
absorbance of the sample, negative control (PBS), and positive control
(RBC in water), respectively.
Antibacterial Activity
The antibacterial activity of
the prepared NPs (Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs) was determined
using a disk diffusion technique. In our present study, the activity
was tested against Gram-negative bacteria S. aureus (MTCC96). The strain was grown overnight by inoculation in a soybean-casein
digest broth at 37 °C. The culture suspensions were taken and
adjusted by comparing against 0.4–0.5 McFarland turbidity standard
tubes.[48] Around 20 mL of soybean-casein
digest agar was poured onto sterile glass Petri dishes, and bacteria
cells were inoculated homogeneously on the agar using a spreader.
Paper disks (6 mm) were placed on solidified agar plates, and 10 μL
of each sample was applied on the paper disk. The plates were then
allowed to incubate at 37 °C for 6 h and photographed. Finally,
the antibacterial potency was determined by measuring the diameter
(in mm) of the inhibition zone.
Cytotoxicity Assay
The cytotoxicity of Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs
and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs was evaluated on MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells
and primary endometrial stromal cells using the standard colorimetric
MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)
assay as described earlier.[49−51] Briefly, an MTT solution (10
μL) was added to the cells treated with Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs
and incubated till a purple precipitate formed. Then, DMSO (100 μL)
was used to dissolve the formazan crystals and the absorbance was
measured at 595 and 630 nm (reference wavelength) using a microplate
absorbance reader (BIO-RAD, CA, USA). The percentage of cell viability
was calculated using the following formula:
Breast cancer cells were cultured on cover slips and incubated with
Mor-Cu-HSA-NPs and Mor-Cu-PLGA-NPs for 24 h. A mixture of acridine
orange (1 μg/mL) and ethidium bromide (1 μg/mL) solution
was used to stain both the treated and untreated cells for the assessment
of drug-induced apoptosis. The cells were then observed under a Leica
DM 6000M microscope equipped with a fluorescence attachment, and the
images were acquired with a Leica DFC 450 FX camera attached with
the microscope.
Statistical Analysis
The data presented
in our study
have been expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All experiments
have been conducted at least three times.