Xiaofei Li1,2, Xin Ding1, Yuhang Du1,2, Chao Xiao1, Kang Zheng1, Xianglan Liu1, Xingyou Tian1,2, Xian Zhang1,2. 1. Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic and Energy Conservation Materials, Institute of Solid State Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China. 2. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Liquid metals (LMs) are playing an increasingly important role in the fields of flexible devices, electronics, and thermal management due to their low melting point and excellent thermal and electrical conductivity, and the transformation of LMs in deionized water has recently received much attention. In this paper, we investigate the transformation process of EGaIn microspheres in deionized water and propose a two-step process of microspherical transformation, whereby the microspheres are first deformed into a spindle shape and then into lamellar nanorods. It is also shown that the growth of GaOOH crystals drives the transformation. Based on this result, EGaIn microspheres with controllable transformation could be prepared, such as spindle or lamellar rod shapes, extending the application area of LMs.
Liquid metals (LMs) are playing an increasingly important role in the fields of flexible devices, electronics, and thermal management due to their low melting point and excellent thermal and electrical conductivity, and the transformation of LMs in deionized water has recently received much attention. In this paper, we investigate the transformation process of EGaIn microspheres in deionized water and propose a two-step process of microspherical transformation, whereby the microspheres are first deformed into a spindle shape and then into lamellar nanorods. It is also shown that the growth of GaOOH crystals drives the transformation. Based on this result, EGaIn microspheres with controllable transformation could be prepared, such as spindle or lamellar rod shapes, extending the application area of LMs.
Liquid metals (LMs)
are metals with melting points of below or
near room temperature,[1−3] and as a kind of LM, Ga has the advantages of low
melting point (29.7 °C), low toxicity,[4] low viscosity,[5] excellent conductivity,[6] and thermal conductivity.[7] In addition, the melting point temperature of gallium-based alloys
such as gallium indium alloy (EGaIn),[8] gallium
tin alloy (EGaSn), and gallium indium tin alloy (EGaInSn, Galinstan)
can be regulated by changing the proportion of alloy components. These
unique properties of gallium-based LMs make them have wide application
potential in soft electronics,[1,9,10] flexible devices,[11,12] biological devices,[13,14] thermal management,[15,16] and nuclear industry.[17,18]Gallium-based LMs are highly susceptible to oxidation when
exposed
to air, forming a dense thin film of gallium oxide, which prevents
further oxidation of internal gallium[1,19] while reducing
the surface tension,[20] thermal conductivity,
and conductivity of LM.[21,22] However, a significant
morphological change occurs when LM is dispersed in deionized (DI)
water to form LM microspheres. Porat’s group[23] sonicated pure gallium in DI water and found the presence
of GaOOH microcrystals on the surface of gallium microspheres. Dickey’s
group[24] dispersed gallium indium alloy
in DI water to form the LM microsphere suspension using an ultrasonic
probe, investigated the process of LM microsphere transformation from
microspheres to nanorods, proved that heating makes EGaIn microspheres
turn into GaOOH lamellae, and drew a conclusion that heating promoted
the transformation of LM microspheres. Then, Zhou’s group[25] prepared LM microspheres with photoinduced transformation
using a similar method. They dispersed EGaIn into microspheres in
DI water and coated polydopamine (PDA) on the surface, using the photothermal
conversion ability of PDA to control the transformation of LM microspheres;
however, LM microspheres can only deform into spindle-like particles
unlike Dickey group’s report. In addition, Kalantar-Zadeh’s
group[26] prepared GaOOH by oxidizing pure
gallium in DI water with the aid of ultrasound, where the surface
of the gallium was oxidized in water, and the oxide layer prevented
the oxidation of the internal gallium, which could be peeled off by
ultrasound, thus oxidizing all the pure gallium into monolayer GaOOH
crystals. In the present reports, similar conditions yielded different
results and, in addition to the shape change, the components of the
deformed LM also changed, thus supposedly resulting in properties
different from pure gallium or gallium-based alloys with new functions.[22] However, there are few reports on the transformation
mechanism and performance changes of LM microspheres in DI water.
If the mechanism of transformation of LM microspheres in DI water
can be investigated clearly, it is of great importance to guide the
shape regulation of LM microspheres in water and to improve the stability
of LM microspheres in DI water, and it can greatly expand the application
fields of LM, for example, semiconductor,[27,28] catalyst,[29,30] drug delivery systems,[31,32] and so forth.In view of this, we designed experiments to
explore the transformation
mechanism of LM microspheres in DI water and the material changes
during transformation. A suspension of LM microspheres was prepared
by successfully dispersing EGaIn in DI water under an ice–water
bath using an ultrasonic cell disruptor,[33] as shown in Figure a. The suspension was then allowed to stand at room temperature and
sampled at regular intervals. Surprisingly, it was found that the
LM microspheres were transformed into a spindle shape and then into
nanorods formed by stacking GaOOH sheet crystals face-to-face (Figure b), which has new
applications as optics,[26,34] catalysts,[35,36] gallium oxide semiconductors,[22,37] and so on. Moreover,
the final morphology in the spindle shape could be successfully stabilized
by controlling the concentration of LM microspheres in the suspension.
Finally, the mechanism of LM microspherical shape transformation was
meticulously explored, and the whole transformation process was explained,
providing a guide for improving the stability of LM water suspensions
and obtaining LM microspheres with tunable shape, which has potential
applications for the drug delivery system[4,38,39] and colloidal jamming.[40]
Figure 1
(a) EGaIn was added to DI water and ultrasonically crushed for
30 min to obtain an aqueous suspension of LM microspheres. (b) LM
microspheres in the suspension are first deformed into a spindle shape
and then into lamellar nanorods.
(a) EGaIn was added to DI water and ultrasonically crushed for
30 min to obtain an aqueous suspension of LM microspheres. (b) LM
microspheres in the suspension are first deformed into a spindle shape
and then into lamellar nanorods.
Results
and Discussion
Morphological Transformation of LM Microspheres
0.2
g of EGaIn was added to 20 mL of DI water and then broken with an
ultrasonical probe in ice–water bath for 30 min at 75 W.[25] The suspension was then centrifuged to obtain
the LM nano droplet suspension with standard concentration. The suspensions
were left to stand at room temperature and sampled regularly for observation.
Different from the previous reports of direct transformation of LM
microspheres into nanorods,[24] it was found
that the transformation of LM microspheres includes two steps: the
microspheres first become spindle-shaped, as shown in Figure (a2,a3). LM microspheres with
an average size of 293.8 nm become spindle-like particles with an
average length of 576.6 nm and an average width of 348.6 nm after
3 h. At 6 h, the average length and width of the spindle-like particles
are 595.6 and 342.4 nm, respectively, and their particle size distribution
is shown in Figure S1. Then, the spindle-like
particles are deformed into lamellar nanorods, as shown in Figure (a4); in this case,
the average length of the particles is 651.0 nm, the average width
is 347.3 nm, and the particle size distribution is shown in Figure S2. On the second day, the particles are
basically transformed into lamellar nanorods, and the average length
and width of the nanoparticles are 687.9 and 378.2 nm, respectively.
The lamellar nanorods are still growing at this time, the average
length and width of the lamellar nanorods are 795.3 and 387.0 nm,
respectively, on the third day, as shown in Figure (a6), and the particle size distribution
is shown in Figure S3. In addition, it
can be found in Figure b,c that the average length and width of the particles increased
during the transformation process; however, the length increased faster
and grew preferentially in the length direction from 3 h to day 1.
Figure 2
(a) Morphology
and particle size of LM particles at 0 h, 3 h, 6
h, 1 day, 2 days, and 3 days. (b,c) Plot of the variation of the width
and length of LM particles during transformation.
(a) Morphology
and particle size of LM particles at 0 h, 3 h, 6
h, 1 day, 2 days, and 3 days. (b,c) Plot of the variation of the width
and length of LM particles during transformation.LM microspheres in DI water eventually turn into lamellar nanorods.
To address this issue, we explored the factors affecting the morphology
of LM microspheres in DI water. After experiments, it was found that
the concentration of LM microspheres determined the final shape of
microspheres. When the suspension of the standard concentration was,
respectively, diluted 2.5 and 7.5 times, LM microspheres will still
deform into laminar nanorods after resting for 3 days, as shown in Figure b,c. When diluted
15 times, the nanosheets that make up the nanorods were no longer
regular, and the final morphology had transitioned to a spindle shape,
as shown in Figure d. However, when the dilution level reached 30 times, the final morphology
stayed in a spindle shape, although the nanosheets could still be
observed on its surface, as shown in Figure e. At a dilution of 60 times, the microspheres
disappeared, and the final form was spindle-like, as shown in Figure f. The suspensions
of standard concentrations and different dilutions are shown in Figure S4, and the particles precipitated after
3 days of standing. In order to avoid the error caused by a too short
resting time, the resting time was extended, and the results were
similar (Figure S5). According to this
result, the morphology of LM microspheres could be regulated by controlling
the suspension concentration and resting time. In the meantime, we
performed X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the particles stabilized
in both morphologies separately, as shown in Figure a. The main components of the particles in
both forms are GaOOH (GaO2H). Differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) was performed on the spindle-like particles obtained at 12 h
and the lamellar nanorods obtained at 3 days, as shown in Figure b,d. EGaIn was still
present in the spindle-like particles at this time, and the heat absorption
peak when indium melts could be observed; while in the DSC curve of
the lamellar nanorods, there is no longer a heat absorption peak when
EGaIn melts, but only a heat absorption peak when indium melts, which
indicates that the indium is removed from the alloy, as shown in Figure c. The indium element
is enriched into indium microspheres, detached from spindle-like particles
and nanorods. This is consistent with previous reports on dealloying
of EGaIn.[24]
Figure 3
Morphology of particles
in a suspension of standard concentration
diluted (a) 0 times, (b) 2.5 times, (c) 7.5 times, (d) 15 times, (e)
30 times, and (f) 60 times and maintained for 3 days.
Figure 4
(a) XRD spectra of the spindle-like particles and the lamellar
nanorods and the spectra for standard GaO2H (PDF #06-0180)
and In (PDF #05-0642). (b) DSC curves of spindle-like particles obtained
after resting for 12 h. (c) SEM images and EDS mappings of the microsphere,
the spindle-like particles, and the lamellar nanorods. (d) DSC curves
of lamellar nanorods.
Morphology of particles
in a suspension of standard concentration
diluted (a) 0 times, (b) 2.5 times, (c) 7.5 times, (d) 15 times, (e)
30 times, and (f) 60 times and maintained for 3 days.(a) XRD spectra of the spindle-like particles and the lamellar
nanorods and the spectra for standard GaO2H (PDF #06-0180)
and In (PDF #05-0642). (b) DSC curves of spindle-like particles obtained
after resting for 12 h. (c) SEM images and EDS mappings of the microsphere,
the spindle-like particles, and the lamellar nanorods. (d) DSC curves
of lamellar nanorods.
Mechanism of the First
Step of Transformation
According
to the previous result, the first step in the transformation of EGaIn
microspheres is that the microspheres change into spindle-like nanoparticles.
During the resting process, it can be observed that the particles
in the suspension precipitate, while generating many bubbles (Figure S6). In addition, LM can easily react
with oxygen to form an amorphous gallium oxide film on its surface,
with a thickness of about 2–3 nm.[41] As shown in Figure S7, the thickness
of the amorphous oxide on the surface of the freshly prepared LM microspheres
is 6 nm, much greater than that reported in the literature, which
may be caused by the partial conversion of Ga2O3 to GaOOH. In view of the eventual product GaOOH, the reaction equation[42] isWe therefore conjecture that the GaOOH triggered
transformation. In order to verify this conjecture, NaOH aqueous solution
was added to the suspension that had been left for 6 h to remove GaOOH
from the surface of particles,[43] and the
spindle-like nanoparticles disappeared from the suspension after treatment,
and the precipitated particles were microspheres with an average particle
size of 18.0 μm, as shown in Figure a–c, which confirmed the conjecture
that GaOOH brought about transformation. In addition, we found that
the particles in the suspension treated by NaOH completely precipitated
in about 40 min, while the untreated suspension has no obvious changes,
as shown in Figure S8, indicating that
GaOOH can slow down the sedimentation rate of particles.[44]
Figure 5
(a) After standing for 6 h, some of the microspheres became
spindle-like.
(b) After treatment with NaOH solution, the particles were transformed
into microspheres. (c) Particle size distribution of the freshly prepared
EGaIn microspheres, the average particle size of the microspheres
is 293.8 nm. (d) Particle size distribution of the microspheres obtained
after NaOH treatment, the average particle size of the microspheres
is 18.0 μm.
(a) After standing for 6 h, some of the microspheres became
spindle-like.
(b) After treatment with NaOH solution, the particles were transformed
into microspheres. (c) Particle size distribution of the freshly prepared
EGaIn microspheres, the average particle size of the microspheres
is 293.8 nm. (d) Particle size distribution of the microspheres obtained
after NaOH treatment, the average particle size of the microspheres
is 18.0 μm.In order to further explore
the mechanism of action of GaOOH, TEM
was conducted for the particles in the suspension that stood for 6
h. As shown in Figure a, it can be clearly observed that there is a layer of material on
the surface of EGaIn microspheres. Combined with the previous result
(Figure a,b), this
layer of material is GaOOH. EGaIn microspheres will contact each other
due to clusters, but GaOOH will hinder the fusion of EGaIn microspheres
(Figure d) and slow
down the precipitation rate, which is consistent with our previous
experimental results (Figure S8). With
the continuous outward growth of GaOOH on the surface of microspheres,
spindle-like GaOOH nanoparticles will be gradually formed, as shown
in Figure b. At the
same time, small microspheres will contact each other by GaOOH and
grow into a GaOOH particle during GaOOH growth, as shown in Figure c, which just explains
why the size of microspheres changes greatly after transformation.
The average particle size of microspheres before transformation is
293.8 nm, as shown in Figure d, while the average length and width of spindle-like particles
are 595.6 and 342.4 nm, as shown in Figures (a3) and S1b.
Figure 6
TEM images
of the nanoparticles after standing for 6 h. (a,b) Outward
growth of GaOOH crystals on the surface of microspheres. (c) Multiple
small microspheres were in contact with each other through GaOOH and
provide gallium atoms for the growth of GaOOH crystals. (d) Due to
the presence of GaOOH on the surface, the microspheres did not fuse
with each other. (e) TEM image of the microspheres (e1), HRTEM image
of GaOOH on the surface of the microsphere (e2), FFT image of HRTEM
(e3), and SEAD image of GaOOH on the surface of the microsphere (e4).
(f) TEM image of a spindle-like particle (f1), HRTEM image of a spindle-like
particle (f2), FFT image of HRTEM (f3), and SEAD image of a spindle-like
particle (f4).
TEM images
of the nanoparticles after standing for 6 h. (a,b) Outward
growth of GaOOH crystals on the surface of microspheres. (c) Multiple
small microspheres were in contact with each other through GaOOH and
provide gallium atoms for the growth of GaOOH crystals. (d) Due to
the presence of GaOOH on the surface, the microspheres did not fuse
with each other. (e) TEM image of the microspheres (e1), HRTEM image
of GaOOH on the surface of the microsphere (e2), FFT image of HRTEM
(e3), and SEAD image of GaOOH on the surface of the microsphere (e4).
(f) TEM image of a spindle-like particle (f1), HRTEM image of a spindle-like
particle (f2), FFT image of HRTEM (f3), and SEAD image of a spindle-like
particle (f4).In addition, we compared the high-resolution
transmission electron
microscopy (HRTEM) and selected-area electron diffraction (SEAD) of
spindle-like particles and microspheres that had been left to stand
for 6 h, further confirming that it was the growth of GaOOH that caused
the transformation. As shown in Figure e, although HRTEM of the microspheres showed that there
were crystalline regions of GaOOH, SEAD image and fast Fourier transform
(FFT) of HRTEM demonstrated that GaOOH was not well crystallized.
Compared to GaOOH of the microspheres’ surface, the crystal
structure of the spindle-like particles is more prefect,[45] as shown by the SEAD and FFT of HRTEM of the
spindle particles (Figure f). What is more, the EGaIn is still present in the spindle
particles, as shown in Figure b. Furthermore, HRTEM of the edge region of the spindle particles
shows that GaOOH is gradually growing in the direction of the long
axis of the spindle (Figure f).[46,47] This is evidence that it is the
growth of the GaOOH crystal that is causing the transformation.
Mechanism of the Second Step of Transformation
The
further transformation of GaOOH spindle-like particles into GaOOH
lamellar nanorods is to be explained in terms of the GaOOH crystal
structure. We have performed TEM, HRTEM, and SEAD on the lamellar
nanorods. As shown in Figure a, the lamellar nanorods are composed of lamellar GaOOH face-to-face
stacking, which is consistent with the SEM results (Figure (a6)). HRTEM shows the crystal
structure of GaOOH. Combining the SEAD and FFT of HRTEM, as shown
in Figure b–d,
the lamellar material is a single-crystal sheet of GaOOH, which belongs
to the orthorhombic crystal system.[48] The
length, width, and thickness of the sheet crystals are [001], [100],
and [010] crystal orientations, respectively, as shown in Figure b. GaOOH is preferentially
grown along the [001] direction, which is consistent with the previous
reports[46,47] and explains why particles preferentially
grow along their length (Figure b,c).
Figure 7
(a,b) TEM image of the lamellar nanorods. (c) HRTEM image
of the
lamellar nanorods. (d) SEAD pattern from the region of (b). (e) FFT
image of the HRTEM image in (c).
(a,b) TEM image of the lamellar nanorods. (c) HRTEM image
of the
lamellar nanorods. (d) SEAD pattern from the region of (b). (e) FFT
image of the HRTEM image in (c).The crystal structure of GaOOH is similar to that of diaspore in
that it consists of a double chain of co-edged octahedra, with gallium
occupying two-thirds of the octahedral gap and the oxygen-hydroxy
sheets arranged to form a closed hexagon.[49] In principle, the tighter the atomic arrangement of the crystalline
surface, the lower the density of unsaturated bonds and therefore
the lower the specific surface free energy.[50] Based on the gallium atomic density difference, the crystal planes
with the lowest and highest surface energy are {010} and {001}, respectively.
It has been demonstrated that the crystals preferentially grow in
the [001] direction, similar to diaspore crystals, and the largest
plane of the crystal shape at equilibrium belongs to the {010} plane.[47,49] Thus, lamellar nanorods consisting of GaOOH sheet crystal faces
stacked on top of each other will be formed, and the lamellar rods
no longer contain EGaIn this time, as shown in Figure d.In combination with previous analysis,
the EGaIn microspheres provide
the gallium source for the growth of GaOOH crystals. First, GaOOH
spindle-like particles are formed, and the crystals continue to grow
until they are complete before forming GaOOH lamellar nanorods. However,
if the concentration of EGaIn microspheres is too little to provide
enough gallium atoms, they will not be able to form lamellar nanorods
and stabilize in spindle or other shapes, which explains the results
of Figure , and the
concentration of EGaIn microspheres determines the final morphology.
At the same time, gallium atoms are reduced due to depletion, and
indium metal is gradually enriched, which in turn explains the dealloying
phenomenon proposed by the previous report.[24]
Conclusions
In conclusion, this paper reports the detailed
mechanism of the
transformation of EGaIn microspheres in DI water, proposing a two-step
process for the transformation of the microspheres. The first step
is the oxidation of the microsphere surface to grow spindle-like GaOOH
particles; the second step is that the microspheres act as a gallium
source to provide gallium atoms to preferentially grow GaOOH along
the [001] crystal orientation, which eventually deforms into nanorods
made of GaOOH sheet crystal face-to-face stacks. It was also demonstrated
the growth of GaOOH crystals that drives the transformation of the
EGaIn microspheres. It provides guidance to improve the stability
of LM microspheres in DI water and explains the dealloying phenomenon
during LM transformation. In addition, this paper reports that the
concentration of EGaIn microspheres can be used to regulate the final
morphology of particles in water, achieving controlled transformation
of EGaIn microspheres.
Experimental Section
Materials
EGaIn
(LM) composed of 24.5% In and 75.5%
Ga by weight was purchased from northeast nonferrous metals, and its
melting point is 15.7 °C; DI water was prepared in our laboratory;
NaOH (≥96%) was purchased from Tianjin BASF Chemical Co. Ltd.;
and ethyl alcohol (99.5%) was purchased from Aladdin.
Preparation
of the LM Suspension of Standard Concentration
20 mL of DI
water was poured into a glass reagent bottle, 0.20
g of EGaIn was added, and the system was ultrasonically treated for
30 min under ice–water bath with an ultrasonic cell disrupter
(UX-300, Mitsui Electric Japan). After ultrasonic crushing, EGaIn
was transformed into microspheres, and the LM suspension was obtained.
However, the particle size of EGaIn microspheres was not uniform at
this time. The suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at the speed of
2000 rad/min to remove EGaIn microspheres with excessive particle
size. The suspension was then centrifuged for 8 min at a speed of
5000 rad/min to remove the nanoparticles with small particle size
(HC-2518 high speed centrifuge, AnHui USTC Zonkia Scientific Instruments
Co. Ltd.). Then, 1.5 mL of DI water was added to each centrifuge tube,
which was removed after shocking evenly. Another 1 mL of DI water
was added to the centrifuge tube for washing, and 20 mL of the LM
suspension with standard concentration was finally obtained.
Characterization
The standard concentration of the
suspension was diluted 2.5 times and placed in five small reagent
bottles, and each bottle is about 10 mL. Samples were taken from the
bottom of the sediment after standing for 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 1 day, 2
days, and 3 days, respectively. SEM and energy-dispersive spectrometry
(EDS) were performed after dilution (FIB, Auriga, Zeiss, Germany).
Among them, samples were stood for 6 h and 3 days for HRTEM and SEAD
(Tecnai TF-20, Thermo Fisher). The standard suspension was diluted
2.5, 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 times, respectively. 15 mL was taken from
each group and placed in a small reagent bottle for 3 days and then
sampled from the bottom for SEM. HRTEM and SEAD were also performed
for samples diluted 30 times. The lamellar rod particles are obtained
after dilution of 2.5 times, and the spindle particles are obtained
after dilution of 30 times. The powders of the two groups of suspensions
after drying at 120 °C (blast dryer, DHG-9075A, Shanghai Yiheng
Scientific Instruments Co.) are for XRD (Rigaku SmartLab 9 kW, Japan
Science Co.). 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution was added to the suspension
that stood for 6 h and then stood for 40 min. The supernatant was
poured out and cleaned with ethanol three times before sampling for
SEM.
Authors: Darren J Lipomi; Michael Vosgueritchian; Benjamin C-K Tee; Sondra L Hellstrom; Jennifer A Lee; Courtney H Fox; Zhenan Bao Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2011-10-23 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Michael D Bartlett; Navid Kazem; Matthew J Powell-Palm; Xiaonan Huang; Wenhuan Sun; Jonathan A Malen; Carmel Majidi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Benjamin J Carey; Jian Zhen Ou; Rhiannon M Clark; Kyle J Berean; Ali Zavabeti; Anthony S R Chesman; Salvy P Russo; Desmond W M Lau; Zai-Quan Xu; Qiaoliang Bao; Omid Kevehei; Brant C Gibson; Michael D Dickey; Richard B Kaner; Torben Daeneke; Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 14.919