| Literature DB >> 35284371 |
Tianyue Wan1, Wei Lu1, Peijin Sun1.
Abstract
The quality of street space is the comprehensive suitability evaluation from the objective physical environments and the subjective pedestrian perception. Since the existing quality measurement models of street space do not consider both subjective and objective aspects, it is difficult for planners to accurately locate the low-quality streets that need to be regenerated. To solve this problem, this study proposes a new 5D+3S measurement model for street space quality evaluation. This model incorporates the widely acknowledged 5D dimensions of the physical environments (Design, Destination accessibility, Distance to transit, Density, and Diversity), and the 3S dimensions (Sociality, Safety, and Status) of walking perception derived from the keywords clustering on relevant literature. To test the validity of the proposed model, this study makes a comparative analysis on the results of the public assessment, expert scoring, and model measurement to verify whether the measurement results are objective and convincing. The results show that the quality grade obtained by the proposed measurement model is highly consistent with the subjective evaluation outcomes of the public and experts. Thus, the proposed measurement model is effective in quality measurement of the street space, which provides a new idea for future large-scale diagnosis of city public space quality.Entities:
Keywords: comprehensive measurement; pedestrian perception; physical environment; street space; validity test
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35284371 PMCID: PMC8907578 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.816317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Representative studies for the quality measurement system of street space.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Physical environment | (1) Functionality | Cervero and Kockelman ( | The 3D system: design, density, and diversity. |
| (1) Functionality | Active Living Research ( | Microscale audit of pedestrian Streetscapes: crossing facility convenience, street space design, space art aesthetics, walking path quality, and bus facility stop. | |
| Moura et al. ( | The 7C system: facility coexistence, spatial comfort, daily management, street connectivity, landmark buildings or facilities, spatial convenience, and social. | ||
| (1) Functionality | Oliveira ( | Spatial morphology measurement system: block scale, building function, building age, building alignment rate, street accessibility, and plot density. | |
| (1) Functionality | Sevtsuk and Mekonnen ( | Urban spatial network measurement system: population density, building function, building strength, and building quality, street accessibility. | |
| (1) Functionality | Ewing and Cervero ( | The 5D system: design, density, diversity, distance to transit, and Destination accessibility. | |
| B. Pedestrian perception | (1) Psychology | Ewing and Handy ( | Measuring psychology of pedestrian from image ability, enclosure, human scale, transparency, and complexity. |
| (1) Vision | Dubey et al. ( | Measuring perceptual attributes of pedestrian activity: safe, lively, dull, rich, depressed, and beautiful. | |
| (1) Vision | Li et al. ( | Measuring pedestrian comfort through visual elements and corresponding auditory elements, including water flow, plants, birds, human activities. | |
| (1) Vision | Porta and Renne ( | Measuring four subjective indicators: pedestrian walking emotion, sense of enclosure, security, social interaction, and attractiveness. | |
| (1) Vision | Rezvanipour et al. ( | Measuring pedestrian perception from five aspects: street comfort, pleasant walking pleasure, physical safety, environmental safety, and criminal safety. |
Figure 1The theoretical framework.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of street view image processing.
The 5D+3S measurement model framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | Design | Natural environment | Green view index (GVI) ( |
|
| Sky openness (SO) ( |
| |||
| Build environment | Street integration (SI) ( |
| ||
| Street connectivity (SC) ( | ||||
| Destination accessibility | Traffic accessibility | Traffic accessibility (TA) ( |
| |
| Network accessibility (NA) ( |
| |||
| Accessibility of public facilities | Facilities accessibility (FA) ( | |||
| Distance to transit | Distance from underground traffic | Distance to subway (DS) ( |
| |
| Distance from ground traffic | Distance to bus-station (DB) ( |
| ||
| Density | Population density ( | Heatmap on weekday (HW) |
| |
| Heatmap on rest-day (HR) |
| |||
| Building density | Floor-area Ratio (FR) ( |
| ||
| Diversity | Diversity of public facilities | Number of public facilities (NPF) ( |
| |
| Mixture of public facilities (MPF) ( |
| |||
| 3S | Sociality | Social crowd ( | Low-speed crowd agglomeration (LCA) ( |
|
| Safety | Individual safety | Individual safety (IS) ( |
| |
| Traffic safety | Traffic safety (TS) ( |
| ||
| Status | Regional culture ( | Historical and cultural land (HCL) |
| |
| Cultural atmosphere (CA) |
| |||
| Regional landscape | Landscape visibility (LV) ( |
|
Figure 3Technical framework diagram of validity detection.
Figure 4The street proportion of CVS within the interval of Jenks natural breaks classification.
Figure 5The spatial distribution and kernel density analysis of comprehensive value of street (CVS). (A) The spatial distribution of CVS. (B) Kernel density analysis of CVS.
Figure 6Results of the 5D dimensions physical environment quality measurement of street space. (A) Measurement results of design. (B) Measurement results of destination accessibility. (C) Measurement results of distance to transit. (D) Measurement results of density. (E) Measurement results of diversity.
Figure 7Results of the 3S dimension quality measurement of street space. (A) Measurement results of sociality. (B) Measurement results of safety. (C) Measurement results of status.
Figure 8CVS clustering result graph. (A) Dendrogram of the hierarchical clustering. (B) Two-dimensional planar clustering result plot.
Figure 9Comparison between the results of entropy method and clustering algorithm for the CVS.
The criteria for expert scoring.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Physical environment | • Street greening and sky view | 5-Excellent (Very strong advantages with negligible weaknesses) |
| Pedestrian perception | • Concentration degree of walking and riding people. | 2-Weak (Streets have few strengths with major weaknesses) |
The results of the subjective evaluation and the objective validation.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Zhongshan road | 4.1 | 4.5 | 8.6 | High | 0.6832 |
| Luoyu road | 1.8 | 1.4 | 3.2 | Low | 0.1274 |
| Youyi road | 2.8 | 2.7 | 5.5 | Medium | 0.2519 |
Classification table of comprehensive quality measurement values of street space.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | [0.0180, 0.1714] | Low quality |
| Class 2 | [0.1715, 0.2874] | Medium quality |
| Class 3 | [0.2875, 0.7280] | High quality |