En-Tao Liu1, Shuqin Zhou2, Yingwen Li2, Siwei Zhang2, Zelan Ma2, Junbiao Guo2, Lei Guo2, Yue Zhang2, Quanlai Guo2, Li Xu2. 1. WeiLun PET Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China. 2. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine and Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract
Background: High tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we aimed to determine the value of magnetic resonance (MR)-based preoperative nomogram in predicting TMB status in lower-grade glioma (LGG) patients. Methods: Overall survival (OS) data were derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and then analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) analysis. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 168 subjects obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation was explored by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Finally, we performed tenfold cross validation. TMB values were retrieved from the supplementary information of a previously published article. Results: The high TMB subtype was associated with the shortest median OS (high vs. low: 50.9 vs. 95.6 months, P<0.05). The tdROC for the high-TMB tumors was 74% (95% CI: 61-86%) for survival at 12 months, and 71% (95% CI: 60-82%) for survival at 24 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that three risk factors [extranodular growth: odds ratio (OR): 8.367, 95% CI: 3.153-22.199, P<0.01; length-width ratio ≥ median: OR: 1.947, 95% CI: 1.025-3.697, P<0.05; frontal lobe: OR: 0.455, 95% CI: 0.229-0.903, P<0.05] were significant independent predictors of high-TMB tumors. The nomogram showed good calibration and discrimination. This model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.736 (95% CI: 0.655-0.817). Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful. The average accuracy of the tenfold cross validation was 71.6% for high-TMB tumors. Conclusions: Our results indicated that a distinct OS disadvantage was associated with the high TMB group. In addition, extranodular growth, nonfrontal lobe tumors and length-width ratio ≥ median can be conveniently used to facilitate the prediction of high-TMB tumors. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Background: High tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, we aimed to determine the value of magnetic resonance (MR)-based preoperative nomogram in predicting TMB status in lower-grade glioma (LGG) patients. Methods: Overall survival (OS) data were derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and then analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) analysis. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 168 subjects obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation was explored by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Finally, we performed tenfold cross validation. TMB values were retrieved from the supplementary information of a previously published article. Results: The high TMB subtype was associated with the shortest median OS (high vs. low: 50.9 vs. 95.6 months, P<0.05). The tdROC for the high-TMB tumors was 74% (95% CI: 61-86%) for survival at 12 months, and 71% (95% CI: 60-82%) for survival at 24 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that three risk factors [extranodular growth: odds ratio (OR): 8.367, 95% CI: 3.153-22.199, P<0.01; length-width ratio ≥ median: OR: 1.947, 95% CI: 1.025-3.697, P<0.05; frontal lobe: OR: 0.455, 95% CI: 0.229-0.903, P<0.05] were significant independent predictors of high-TMB tumors. The nomogram showed good calibration and discrimination. This model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.736 (95% CI: 0.655-0.817). Decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful. The average accuracy of the tenfold cross validation was 71.6% for high-TMB tumors. Conclusions: Our results indicated that a distinct OS disadvantage was associated with the high TMB group. In addition, extranodular growth, nonfrontal lobe tumors and length-width ratio ≥ median can be conveniently used to facilitate the prediction of high-TMB tumors. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Eric Bouffet; Valérie Larouche; Brittany B Campbell; Daniele Merico; Richard de Borja; Melyssa Aronson; Carol Durno; Joerg Krueger; Vanja Cabric; Vijay Ramaswamy; Nataliya Zhukova; Gary Mason; Roula Farah; Samina Afzal; Michal Yalon; Gideon Rechavi; Vanan Magimairajan; Michael F Walsh; Shlomi Constantini; Rina Dvir; Ronit Elhasid; Alyssa Reddy; Michael Osborn; Michael Sullivan; Jordan Hansford; Andrew Dodgshun; Nancy Klauber-Demore; Lindsay Peterson; Sunil Patel; Scott Lindhorst; Jeffrey Atkinson; Zane Cohen; Rachel Laframboise; Peter Dirks; Michael Taylor; David Malkin; Steffen Albrecht; Roy W R Dudley; Nada Jabado; Cynthia E Hawkins; Adam Shlien; Uri Tabori Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zachary R Chalmers; Caitlin F Connelly; David Fabrizio; Laurie Gay; Siraj M Ali; Riley Ennis; Alexa Schrock; Brittany Campbell; Adam Shlien; Juliann Chmielecki; Franklin Huang; Yuting He; James Sun; Uri Tabori; Mark Kennedy; Daniel S Lieber; Steven Roels; Jared White; Geoffrey A Otto; Jeffrey S Ross; Levi Garraway; Vincent A Miller; Phillip J Stephens; Garrett M Frampton Journal: Genome Med Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Catherine R Garcia; Stacey A Slone; Thomas Pittman; William H St Clair; Donita D Lightner; John L Villano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 3.240