| Literature DB >> 35284236 |
Dina Mostafa Mohammed1, Kawkab A Ahmed2, Marwa A Desoukey1, Bassem A Sabry3.
Abstract
Peptic ulcer syndrome (PUD) has been acknowledged as one of the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. Several reports indicated the ability of plant derived dosages as antiulcer agents. Many prior investigations have implied some biological activities of Lawsonia inermis L. The aim of this current investigation was to estimate the antiulcer capability of Lawsonia inermis L. leaves and its nano formulation against hazardous biochemical and histological changes in aspirin-induced ulcer rats. Methods divided into 6 groups (6 rats/group), Normal control (negative), Group (1) receiving dose of (200 g/kg) Lawsonia inermis L. for 8 weeks, Group (2) receiving (200 g/kg) nano Lawsonia inermis L. leaves for 8 weeks, Group (3) ulcer control group receiving a single dose (500 mg aspirin/kg rat body weight),groups 4& 5 receiving aspirin and either Lawsonia inermis L. leaves or nano Lawsonia inermis L. leaves for 8 weeks.Entities:
Keywords: Aspirin; Gastric ulcers; Herbal Medicines; Lawsonia inermis L.; Pharmacological activities; Rat
Year: 2022 PMID: 35284236 PMCID: PMC8914991 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. (2)The Zeta Sizer ofLawsonia inermis L.
The effect of Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves in normal and nano-scale on Total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and Triglycerides.
| Group | Total cholesterol mg / dL | HDL mg / dL | LDL mg / dL | Triglycerides mg / dL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.5 ± 3 | 17.7 ± 1.56 | 10.8 ± 1.61 | 66 ± 6.30 | |
| 36.1 ± 2.6a | 12.1 ± 1.7a | 12.7 ± 2.26a | 65.8 ± 3.31a | |
| 29.2 ± 2.95a | 10.6 ± 1.35b | 10.3 ± 2.29a | 51.4 ± 5.64a | |
| 78.2 ± 4.04b | 42.1 ± 3.22c | 25.3 ± 2.87b | 167.7 ± 6.42b | |
| 29.2 ± 6.14c | 14.9 ± 0.97d | 13.2 ± 4.69c | 68.9 ± 7.05c | |
| 23 ± 3.45d | 14.8 ± 0.75e | 8.2 ± 1.88d | 65.1 ± 4.31d |
* * Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05.
The effect of Lawsonia inermis L. leaves in normal and nano-scale on creatinine, urea and uric acid.
| Group | Creatinine mg / dL | Urea mg / dL | Uric Acid mg / dL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.55 ± 0.07 | 38.4 ± 5.04 | 2.37 ± 0.14 | |
| 0.54 ± 0.08a | 38.6 ± 4.33a | 2.52 ± 0.18a | |
| 0.44 ± 0.02a | 35.7 ± 3.13a | 2.23 ± 0.28a | |
| 0.94 ± 0.23a | 77.5 ± 3.12b | 3.62 ± 0.5b | |
| 0.43 ± 0.02b | 37.5 ± 2.57c | 2.62 ± 0.19c | |
| 0.4 ± 0.07c | 37.1 ± 3.37d | 2.20 ± 0.18d |
** Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.005.
The effect of Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves in normal and nano-scale on AST, ALT, and ALP.
| Group | AST mg / dL | ALT µg / dL | ALP IU / L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.8 ± 1.51 | 24.3 ± 3.07 | 65.07 ± 5.09 | |
| 30.5 ± 1.96a | 21.3 ± 2.87a | 63.81 ± 4.78a | |
| 27.5 ± 1.26b | 18.5 ± 2.92a | 62.41 ± 4.09a | |
| 57.7 ± 1.05c | 36.3 ± 3.58b | 117.15 ± 9.78b | |
| 37 ± 1.48d | 15.8 ± 1.83c | 53.15 ± 4.09c | |
| 34.2 ± 2.17e | 18.7 ± 4.67d | 43.78 ± 5.48d |
* * Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.005.
Fig. (4)Photomicrographs of H&E stained stomach sections of rats: (a) Normal control showing the normal histological architecture of gastric layers. (b& c) treated with Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves and nano Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves respectively showing no histopathological alterations. (d) Ulcer group (positive control), showing necrosis of gastric mucosa, ulceration (red arrow), submucosal edema (blue arrow), inflammatory cells infiltration (yellow arrow) and congested blood vessel (black arrow). (e) Ulcer treated with Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves, showing slight submucosal edema (blue arrow). (f) Ulcer + nano Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves showing normal gastric layers (scale bar, 100 µm).
Fig. (5)Photomicrographs of H&E stained liver sections of rats: (a) Normal control showing the normal histological architecture of hepatic parenchyma. (b& c) treated with Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves and nano Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves respectively showing no histopathological alterations. (d) Ulcer group (positive control), showing hepatocellular vacuolar degeneration (black arrow). (e) Ulcer treated with Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves, showing slight hydropic degeneration of some hepatocytes (black arrow) and congestion of central vein (red arrow). (f) Ulcer + nano Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves showing slight hydropic degeneration of hepatocytes (black arrow) (scale bar, 50 µm).
Histopathological lesions scores in different experimental animals.
| Organs | Lesions | Normal control (negative) | Group (1) | Group (2) | Group (3) (positive) | Group (4) | Group (5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -Focal necrosis of the mucosa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| - Kupffer cells activation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Effect of Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves on Gastric juice, pH, free acidity and total acidity.
| Groups | Volume of gastric juice (mL) | pH | Free acidity meq/L/100 g | Total acidity meq/L/100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.25 ± 0.19 | 2.31 ± 0.18 | 25.42 ± 0.85 | 22.24 ± 3.31 | |
| 2.15 ± 0.58a | 2.64 ± 0.05a | 23.78 ± 0.42 | 21.51 ± 6.27 | |
| 2.10 ± 0.49a | 2.55 ± 0.03a | 22.23 ± 0.52 | 20.32 ± 4.33 | |
| 3.5 ± 0.15b | 1.46 ± 0.37b | 58.9 ± 11.3b | 78.22 ± 1.29b | |
| 1.93 ± 0.13c | 2.25 ± 0.12c | 25.56 ± 0.58c | 35.43 ± 1.15c | |
| 1.53 ± 0.12d | 2.16 ± 0.15d | 24.76 ± 0.46d | 30.29 ± 1.19d |
** Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05.
The effect of Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves in normal and nano scale on initial body weight, final body weight, body gain, total food intake and food efficiency.
| Group | Initial body weight (g) | Final body weight (g) | Body gain (g) | Total food intake (g) | Food efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 187.8 ± 4.85 | 230.7 ± 5.48 | 42.8 ± 3.12 | 1190.5 ± 2.29 | 0.036 ± 0.003 | |
| 185 ± 4.33a | 226.2 ± 7.87a | 41.2 ± 5.5a | 1191.2 ± 3.09a | 0.035 ± 0.005a | |
| 183 ± 4.36a | 222.7 ± 4.77a | 39.7 ± 2.08b | 1194 ± 1.61a | 0.033 ± 0.002a | |
| 182.8 ± 4.92a | 223.2 ± 5.35a | 40.3 ± 1.05c | 1142.2 ± 10.63b | 0.035 ± 0.001a | |
| 182.2 ± 5.03a | 228.3 ± 3.67a | 46.2 ± 2.36d | 1183.8 ± 2.24c | 0.039 ± 0.002a | |
| 182.2 ± 4.35a | 227.5 ± 4.5a | 45.3 ± 1.23e | 1183.5 ± 2.17d | 0.038 ± 0.001b |
** Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05.
* * Food Efficiency= (Body Gain/ Total Food Intake).
The effect of Lawsonia inermis L. Leaves in normal and nano-scale onCatalase, lipid peroxide and total antioxidant capacity.
| Group | Catalase mg / dL | Lipid peroxide mg / dL | Total antioxidant mM/L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52.2 ± 1.82 | 19 ± 1.78 | 1.13 ± 0.1 | |
| 56.66 ± 1.93a | 15 ± 1.44a | 1.45 ± 0.11a | |
| 56.80 ± 2.74a | 16 ± 1.2a | 1.71 ± 0.12b | |
| 70.81 ± 1.01b | 26 ± 2.49b | 3.09 ± 0.09c | |
| 36.14 ± 2.56c | 18 ± 0.43c | 1.85 ± 0.15d | |
| 32.22 ± 2.58d | 17 ± 0.67d | 1.23 ± 0.11e |
** Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05.
The effect of Lawsonia inermis L. leaves in normal and nano-scale on albumin, total protein and globulin.
| Group | Albumin g / dL | Total protein mmol/L | Globulin g / dL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.78 ± 0.02 | 5.17 ± 0.34 | 2.4 ± 0.33 | |
| 2.77 ± 0.07a | 4.98 ± 0.23a | 2.21 ± 0.25a | |
| 2.74 ± 0.09a | 4.62 ± 0.31a | 1.88 ± 0.31a | |
| 3.29 ± 0.06b | 6.63 ± 0.19b | 3.33 ± 0.15b | |
| 2.54 ± 0.03c | 3.57 ± 0.19c | 1.04 ± 0.21c | |
| 2.39 ± 0.03d | 3.38 ± 0.18d | 0.99 ± 0.19d |
** Values are expressed as Mean ± SE (n = 6) in which the same letters in each column imply a non-significant difference across varieties, whereas different letters imply a significant difference at P ≤ 0.005.