Literature DB >> 35284168

Polarization memory rate as a metric to differentiate benign and malignant tissues.

Daniel C Louie1,2,3,4, Lioudmila Tchvialeva1,2,4, Sunil Kalia1,2,4, Harvey Lui1,2,4, Tim K Lee1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Non-invasive optical methods for cancer diagnostics, such as microscopy, spectroscopy, and polarimetry, are rapidly advancing. In this respect, finding new and powerful optical metrics is an indispensable task. Here we introduce polarization memory rate (PMR) as a sensitive metric for optical cancer diagnostics. PMR characterizes the preservation of circularly polarized light relative to linearly polarized light as light propagates in a medium. We hypothesize that because of well-known indicators associated with the morphological changes of cancer cells, like an enlarged nucleus size and higher chromatin density, PMR should be greater for cancerous than for the non-cancerous tissues. A thorough literature review reveals how this difference arises from the anomalous depolarization behaviour of many biological tissues. In physical terms, though most biological tissue primarily exhibits Mie scattering, it typically exhibits Rayleigh depolarization. However, in cancerous tissue the Mie depolarization regime becomes more prominent than Rayleigh. Experimental evidence of this metric is found in a preliminary clinical study using a novel Stokes polarimetry probe. We conducted in vivo measurements of 20 benign, 28 malignant and 59 normal skin sites with a 660 nm laser diode. The median PMR values for cancer vs non-cancer are significantly higher for cancer which supports our hypothesis. The reported fundamental differences in depolarization may persist for other types of cancer and create a conceptual basis for further developments in polarimetry applications for cancer detection.
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284168      PMCID: PMC8884210          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.446094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  41 in total

1.  Imaging human epithelial properties with polarized light-scattering spectroscopy.

Authors:  R S Gurjar; V Backman; L T Perelman; I Georgakoudi; K Badizadegan; I Itzkan; R R Dasari; M S Feld
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Influence of the relative refractive index on the depolarization of multiply scattered waves.

Authors:  A D Kim; M Moscoso
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2001-07-24

3.  Comparative study of polarized light propagation in biologic tissues.

Authors:  Vanitha Sankaran; Joseph T Walsh; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Influence of size, proportion, and absorption coefficient of spherical scatterers on the degree of light polarization and the grain size of speckle pattern.

Authors:  Christelle Abou Nader; Rana Nassif; Fabrice Pellen; Bernard Le Jeune; Guy Le Brun; Marie Abboud
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 5.  Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review.

Authors:  Ji Qi; Daniel S Elson
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 6.  Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography - a review [Invited].

Authors:  Johannes F de Boer; Christoph K Hitzenberger; Yoshiaki Yasuno
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Changes of collagen ultrastructure in breast cancer tissue determined by second-harmonic generation double Stokes-Mueller polarimetric microscopy.

Authors:  Ahmad Golaraei; Lukas Kontenis; Richard Cisek; Danielle Tokarz; Susan J Done; Brian C Wilson; Virginijus Barzda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Use of Mueller matrix colposcopy in the characterization of cervical collagen anisotropy.

Authors:  Joseph Chue-Sang; Nola Holness; Mariacarla Gonzalez; Joan Greaves; Ilyas Saytashev; Susan Stoff; Amir Gandjbakhche; Viktor Chernomordik; Gene Burkett; Jessica Ramella-Roman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Do different turbid media with matched bulk optical properties also exhibit similar polarization properties?

Authors:  Manzoor Ahmad; Sanaz Alali; Anthony Kim; Michael F G Wood; Masroor Ikram; I Alex Vitkin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.