Shujia Chen1, Xinyu Ben2, Lianyi Guo1, Xiaofei Li1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Brain Science Research and Transformation in Tropical Environment of Hainan Province & Laboratory of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, which brings great challenges to people's life and health. The purpose of this study was to investigate immune related-lncRNAs and identify new biomarkers for the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). Methods: We downloaded data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and used R software to determine the ESTIMATEScore, ImmuneScore, and StromalScore of each tumor sample. We performed prognostic analysis and identified the differentially expressed lnRNAs, which were then used to construct a prognostic model. Among the 44 hub genes in the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, 3 differentially expressed genes were verified by qPCR. Results: Based on the degree of immune infiltration, cluster A had a higher ESTIMATEScore, ImmuneScore, and StromalScore and higher expression levels of PD-L1 (CD274) and CTLA4 than cluster B. Univariate Cox analysis was conducted for these differential lncRNAs, and 57 lncRNAs were found to have prognostic value (P<0.05). gene cluster A had a worse prognosis than gene cluster B (P=0.021). Then, a prognostic model was constructed. The low-risk group had a significantly higher survival rate. Finally, the qPCR results showed that the expression levels of BMPER, PRUNE2, and RBPMS2 were low in GC cell lines. Conclusions: We identified a risk score of 19 lncRNAs as a prognostic marker of GC. There was a relationship between these 19 prognostic-related lncRNAs and the subtypes of infiltrating immune cells. An approach for predicting the prognosis of GC was therefore provided in this study. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Background: Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, which brings great challenges to people's life and health. The purpose of this study was to investigate immune related-lncRNAs and identify new biomarkers for the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). Methods: We downloaded data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and used R software to determine the ESTIMATEScore, ImmuneScore, and StromalScore of each tumor sample. We performed prognostic analysis and identified the differentially expressed lnRNAs, which were then used to construct a prognostic model. Among the 44 hub genes in the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, 3 differentially expressed genes were verified by qPCR. Results: Based on the degree of immune infiltration, cluster A had a higher ESTIMATEScore, ImmuneScore, and StromalScore and higher expression levels of PD-L1 (CD274) and CTLA4 than cluster B. Univariate Cox analysis was conducted for these differential lncRNAs, and 57 lncRNAs were found to have prognostic value (P<0.05). gene cluster A had a worse prognosis than gene cluster B (P=0.021). Then, a prognostic model was constructed. The low-risk group had a significantly higher survival rate. Finally, the qPCR results showed that the expression levels of BMPER, PRUNE2, and RBPMS2 were low in GC cell lines. Conclusions: We identified a risk score of 19 lncRNAs as a prognostic marker of GC. There was a relationship between these 19 prognostic-related lncRNAs and the subtypes of infiltrating immune cells. An approach for predicting the prognosis of GC was therefore provided in this study. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gastric cancer (GC); The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA); immune infiltration
Authors: V Gambardella; J Castillo; N Tarazona; F Gimeno-Valiente; C Martínez-Ciarpaglini; M Cabeza-Segura; S Roselló; D Roda; M Huerta; A Cervantes; T Fleitas Journal: Cancer Treat Rev Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 12.111
Authors: Elizabeth D Thompson; Marianna Zahurak; Adrian Murphy; Toby Cornish; Nathan Cuka; Eihab Abdelfatah; Stephen Yang; Mark Duncan; Nita Ahuja; Janis M Taube; Robert A Anders; Ronan J Kelly Journal: Gut Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Yingyao Zhou; Bin Zhou; Lars Pache; Max Chang; Alireza Hadj Khodabakhshi; Olga Tanaseichuk; Christopher Benner; Sumit K Chanda Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 14.919