| Literature DB >> 35283970 |
Olutayo S Shokunbi1, Ngozi A Ukangwa1.
Abstract
Background: Globally, rising blood pressure is of public health concern as it is a major cause of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and preventable death. This study accessed the relationship of blood pressure status, dietary factors and serum electrolytes among in-school adolescents in Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; dietary patterns; hypertension; table salt
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35283970 PMCID: PMC8889815 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v21i4.32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Blood pressure level of participants based on age and gender
| Age | Male | Female | Overall | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| N | Mean SBP | Mean | N | Mean SBP | Mean | N | Mean SBP | Mean | |
| 10 | 1 | 100.0 | 70.0 | 8 | 95.9±9.5 | 63.8±7.4 | 9 | 96.3±9.0 | 64.4±7.2 |
| 11 | 14 | 103.9±13.5 | 66.2±10.1 | 17 | 98.5±11.9 | 65.4±11.9 | 31 | 100.9±12.7 | 65.8±10.9 |
| 12 | 20 | 105.1±13.6 | 67.0±8.6 | 27 | 104.0±12.3 | 67.8±10.7 | 47 | 104.5±12.7 | 67.5±9.8 |
| 13 | 29 | 103.1±9.9 | 66.0±9.4 | 46 | 118.8±13.0 | 71.3±9.8 | 75 | 108.4±12.6 | 69.3±9.9 |
| 14 | 30 | 112.1±11.1 | 74.0±12.8 | 74 | 111.2±11.5 | 73.7±9.6 | 104 | 111.5±11.4 | 73.9±10.5 |
| 15 | 32 | 112.0±16.1 | 68.0±13.1 | 70 | 112.0±12.7 | 72.9±11.3 | 102 | 112.2±13.8 | 71.5±12.0 |
| 16 | 28 | 114.1±13.5 | 74.0±9.2 | 50 | 114.0±12.4 | 74.1±11.0 | 78 | 114.1±12.7 | 74.4±10.3 |
| 17 | 13 | 118.5±14.5 | 77.7±9.9 | 19 | 116.0±10.9 | 79.3±8.4 | 32 | 117.0±12.3 | 78.6±8.9 |
| 18 | 7 | 129.8±12.9 | 85.3±8.3 | 3 | 106.7±5.7 | 76.7±5.7 | 10 | 122.9±12.4 | 82.7±8.4 |
| Total | 174 | 110.6±15.1 | 71.2±11.7 | 314 | 110.6±12.8 | 72.4±10.7 | 488 | 110.6±13.7 | 71.9±11.0 |
DBP – diastolic blood pressure; SBP – systolic blood pressure.
Distribution of blood pressure status of participants based on gender and age
| Category | Normotensive | Elevated blood | Hypertensive | Total |
| n=343 (70.3) | n=94 (19.3) | n=51 (10.5) | n=488 (100) | |
| Gender |
| |||
| Male | 124 (71.3) | 36 (20.7) | 14 (8.0) | 174 (100) |
| Female | 219 (69.7) | 58 (18.5) | 37 (11.8) | 314 (100) |
| Age (year) |
| |||
| 10 | 8 (88.9) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) | 9 (100) |
| 11 | 26 (83.9) | 4 (12.9) | 1 (3.2) | 31 (100) |
| 12 | 36 (76.6) | 9 (19.1) | 2 (4.3) | 47 (100) |
| 13 | 54 (72.0) | 15 (20.0) | 6 (8.0) | 75 (100) |
| 14 | 63 (60.6) | 29 (27.9) | 12 (11.5) | 104 (100) |
| 15 | 69 (67.6) | 19 (18.6) | 14 (13.7) | 102 (100) |
| 16 | 58 (74.4) | 10 (12.8) | 10 (12.8) | 78 (100) |
| 17 | 22 (68.8) | 6 (18.8) | 4 (12.5) | 32 (100) |
| 18 | 7 (70.0) | 1 (10.0) | 2 (20.0) | 10 (100) |
| Total | 343 (70.3) | 94 (19.3) | 51 (10.5) | 488 (100) |
Note: values represent number of participants (percentage within gender or age category)
3.9% of this group are of stage 1 hypertension and 6.6% are of stage 2 hypertension category.
Consumption pattern (4–6 times weekly) of some food items or groups by participants as related with their blood pressure status
| Food item/group | Normotensive n=343 (70.3%) | Elevated blood | Hypertensive n=51 (10.5%) |
| Carbonated drinks | 22.4 | 26.4 | 19.0 |
| Puff-puff (deep fried | 58.8 | 60.6 | 48.6 |
| Eggs | 50.8 | 50.8 | 58.1 |
| Fruits | 25.9 | 28.5 | 31.4 |
| Vegetables | 54.2 | 56.5 | 36.2 |
| Beef | 30.5 | 23.3 | 32.3 |
Values represent percentage of participants that consumed the food item or food group within the blood pressure category.
Figure 1Percentage of participants who add table salt to already prepared food in relation to blood pressure status
Estimated mean daily sodium and potassium intakes by participants
| Mineral | Mean ± SD | Recommended | UL | |
| mg/person/day | ||||
| Sodium | 2289.2 ± 938.4 (198.1, 5909.3)# | 1200–1500 | ND | |
| Potassium | 1328.6 ± 603.8 (205.3, 3878.0)# | 2300–3000 | ND | |
|
| ||||
| Male | Female | |||
| mg/person/day | ||||
| Sodium | 2404.2 ± 902.0 | 2225.3 ± 971.1 (14.5, | 1200–1500 | ND |
| Potassium | 1384.1 ± 971.6 | 1298 ± 588 (96.4, 0, | 2300–3000 | ND |
# – Values represent mean ± SD (min, max)
Values represent mean ± SD (% consuming below recommendation, % consuming within recommendation, % consuming aove recommendation)
UL – Tolerable Upper Intake Level;
ND – no data; # - Adequate Intake (AI).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine30