| Literature DB >> 35283937 |
Frederico Francisco Fernandes1,2, Juliana Rodrigues Moraes1, Jaqueline Leal Dos Santos1, Thiago Geraldo Soares1, Vitor José Pinto Gouveia1, Alessandra C S Matavel3, William de Castro Borges2, Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro1, Suely Gomes Figueiredo4, Márcia Helena Borges1.
Abstract
Background: Spider venoms induce different physio-pharmacological effects by binding with high affinity on molecular targets, therefore being of biotechnological interest. Some of these toxins, acting on different types of ion channels, have been identified in the venom of spiders of the genus Phoneutria, mainly from P. nigriventer. In spite of the pharmaceutical potential demonstrated by P. nigriventer toxins, there is limited information on molecules from venoms of the same genus, as their toxins remain poorly characterized. Understanding this diversity and clarifying the differences in the mechanisms of action of spider toxins is of great importance for establishing their true biotechnological potential. This prompted us to compare three different venoms of the Phoneutria genus: P. nigriventer (Pn-V), P. eickstedtae (Pe-V) and P. pertyi (Pp-V).Entities:
Keywords: Ion channels; Phoneutria; Protein profile; Spider venom; Toxins
Year: 2022 PMID: 35283937 PMCID: PMC8875809 DOI: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2021-0042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis ISSN: 1678-9180
Figure 1.Enzymatic activities of P. nigriventer (Pn-V), P. pertyi (Pp-V) and P. eickstedtae (Pe-V) venoms. Zymography of crude venoms (50 µg) in (A) 12.5% SDS-PAGE 0.1% gelatin and (B) 12.5% SDS-PAGE 1.5% HA. Enzymatic activities measured by spectrophotometry with (C) dimethyl-casein and (D) hyaluronic acid as substrates. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; p < 0.01 represented with (*) for Pp-V/Pe-V versus Pn-V and with (**) for Pp-V versus Pe-V.
Figure 2.Comparison of the protein profiles of the crude venoms of P. nigriventer (Pn-V), P. pertyi (Pp-V) and P. eickstedtae (Pe-V). (A) SDS-PAGE (discontinuous vertical system with 15%, 10%, and 4% for separating, spacing, and stacking gels, respectively - 100 µg of each venom), under non-reducing (left) and reducing (β-mercaptoetanol 4%, v/v) (right) conditions. The positions of molecular mass markers are indicated on the left. The gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. (B) RP-HPLC profile of crude venoms (30 mg) on preparative Vydac C4 column (2.2 cm x 25 cm). The column was equilibrated using solution A [0.1% TFA (v/v) in ultrapure water] and eluted using solution B [0.1% TFA (v/v) in acetonitrile]. Protein elution was monitored by absorbance at 214 nm. Hachured and striped peaks indicate the fractions corresponding to Tx1 and Tx2-6, respectively. (C) Mass distribution of the fractions from preparative RP-HPLC.
Figure 3.Chemical analyses of purified toxins. MS spectra obtained, respectively, for toxins exhibiting dimer formation and double charge on MALDI/TOF in positive/linear mode - mass range 2-20000 (m/z) using sinapinic acid as matrix.
Figure 4.Alignment of the partial amino acid sequence of toxins identified. Cysteines (Cys, C) residues are highlighted in gray color. Reference: Sequence, accession code and name of P. nigriventer’s toxin deposited in Uniprot database. The size of identified peptides are highlighted in yellow, green, blue and pink. MW: molecular weight (Da). *Theoretical mass value obtained from PeptideMass (www.expasy.com). Mass value according to Richardson et al. [21]. Underlined sequences were obtained by Edman Degradation method. Positions of cysteine residues (labeled in red) were inferred by homology.
Figure 5.Different Tx1 isoforms block Nav1.6 sodium current reversibly. (A) Time course of the blockage of the sodium current peak by Tx1 isoforms from different Phoneutria species and washout kinetics. (B) Recovery of sodium current blockage after 350 s of washout. (C) Percentage of Nav1.6 sodium currents blockage by Tx1 isoforms after stabilization.