| Literature DB >> 35282489 |
Aleksey K Vorontsov1, Vladislav P Troshin1, Yuri A Parkhisenko1, Anton V Korsakov1, Aleksandr V Klimashevich1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate morphological traits of hepatic parenchymal tissue repair in response to injury using the conventional technique (closure) and an innovation method (such as hemostatic medication swab packing and modified batching). The experimental study was carried out on laboratory rats of the Winzar breed using light microscopy, standard stains for micropreparations, and morphometry. Histopathologic examination of micropreparations stained by standard methods revealed pronounced dystrophic processes in hepatocytes located near the necrotic zone (albuminous and hydropic degeneration and chromatin fragmentation in the nuclei). Morphometric studies showed a significant decrease (p<0.001) in almost all indicators of the size of cells and nuclei both near necrosis and distant from it on day 28 of the experiment in the experimental group in comparison to the control group. The results obtained pointed to more intense repair processes when applying the innovation method.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatic damage; Morphometry; Parenchymal tissue; Proliferation; Repair
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35282489 PMCID: PMC8907961 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.03.18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Clin Croat ISSN: 0353-9466 Impact factor: 0.780
Fig. 1Dependence of the absorbable blood volume on the material volume.
Fig. 2Rat hepatic histologic specimen: A, B, C – control group on days 4, 14 and 28 of experiment, respectively; D, E, F – experimental group on days 4, 14 and 28 of experiment, respectively (hematoxylin-eosin staining; magnification ×40).
Results of morphometric studies in control group
| Group | Close to necrotic zone | Away from necrotic zone | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell size (µm) | Nucleus size (µm) | Cell size (µm) | Nucleus size (µm) | |||||
| Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | |
| C4*a | 12.7±0.43 | 19.2±0.37 | 5.8±0.35 | 6.8±0.32 | 12.2±0.39 | 19.1±0.66 | 5.6±0.33 | 6.8±0.26 |
| C14 | 12.9±0.45 | 20.2±0.90 | 5.8±0.47 | 7.6±0.26 | 12.2±1.11 | 19.7±1.04 | 5.7±0.51 | 7.4±0.16 |
| C28 | 13.3±0.50 | 20.3±1.00 | 6.5±0.22 | 7.7±0.18 | 13.8±0.50 | 20.5±0.78 | 6.5±0.30 | 7.6±0.33 |
*p<0.05; adifferences between minimum cell size near necrosis and away from necrosis in C4 group; C = control group, day of experiment
Results of morphometric studies in experimental group
| Group | Close to necrotic zone | Away from necrotic zone | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell size (µm) | Nucleus size (µm) | Cell size (µm) | Nucleus size (µm) | |||||
| Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | |
| E4* a,b,c | 12.6±0.18 | 19.2±0.29 | 6.2±0.43 | 7.6±0.33 | 12.2±0.22 | 18.6±0.30 | 6.1±0.04 | 7.3±0.10 |
| E14 | 12.3±0.46 | 18.1±0.97 | 6.1±0.50 | 7.4±0.62 | 12.9±0.31 | 18.3±0.44 | 5.9±0.33 | 7.1±0.38 |
| E28 | 12.2±0.39 | 17.4±0.86 | 5.8±0.30 | 7.0±0.32 | 12.5±0.48 | 17.8±1.02 | 6.0±0.37 | 7.4±0.35 |
*p<0.05; adifferences between minimum cell size near necrosis and away from necrosis in groups E4 and E14; bdifferences between maximum cell size near necrosis and away from necrosis in group E4; cdifferences between maximum nucleus size near necrosis and away from necrosis in groups E4 and E28; E = experimental group, day of experiment