| Literature DB >> 35282381 |
Jun-Xing Zhu1,2, Quan-Qiao Tang1,2, Can Zhou1,2, Xing-Chi Shi1,2, Si-Yi Yi1,2, Ying Yang1,2.
Abstract
Background: Constructing an ideal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is of great significance to elucidate its complex pathogenesis. Therefore, we introduce a new and simple method to simulate human AAA and construct a rat AAA model through a retroperitoneal approach.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; animal model; beta aminopropionitrile; calcium chloride; elastase; retroperitoneal approach
Year: 2022 PMID: 35282381 PMCID: PMC8905142 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.808732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Schematic diagram of establishing animal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm in rats through retroperitoneal approach.
Primer sequences for quantitative PCR (qPCR).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| β-Actin | CAGGCATTGCTGACAGGATG | TGCTGATCCACATCTGCTGG |
| GAPDH | GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC | TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA |
| MMP2 | GACCCTGGAGCTTTGATGGC | GTGTAGGCGTGGGTCCAGTA |
| MMP9 | GCTCGGATGGTTATCGCTGG | CCAGTTACAGTGACGTCGGC |
Diameter of abdominal aorta of rats in each group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 10 | 1.20 (1.20, 1.30) | 1.30 (1.28, 1.32) | 8.01 (0.00, 8.33) | 0 (0/10) | 0 (0/0) |
| PPE+CaCL2 group | 10 | 1.30 (1.15, 1.35) | 2.20 (1.85, 3.90) | 116.67 (51.75, 200.00) | 80 (8/10) | 12.5 (1/8) |
| PPE group | 10 | 1.25 (1.10, 1.40) | 2.10 (1.68,3.25) | 68.94 (37.94, 132.14) | 60 (6/10) | 0 (0/6) |
| PPE+BNPA group | 10 | 1.25 (1.13,1.45) | 4.20 (3.40, 5.00) | 198.97 (177.40, 326.06) | 100 (10/10) | 60 (6/10) |
The measurement data were expressed by M (P25, P75); M, Median; P25, 1st quartile; P75, 3rd quartile;
: P < 0.05,
: P < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 2Dilatation degree and aneurysm appearance of the abdominal aorta in rats. (A) There was no dilation of abdominal aorta in perfusion segment in Control group, (B) PPE + CaCl2 group perfusion segment abdominal aortic saccular aneurysm local, (C) The fusiform aneurysm of abdominal aorta was perfused in PEE group, (D) In the PPE + BNPA group, the rupture of early aneurysm was in the anterior wall; (E) In the PPE + BNPA group, the rupture of late aneurysm was in the posterior wall.
Comparison of vascular thickness, elastic fiber content, collagen fiber content, and smooth muscle cell content in the abdominal aorta of rats in each group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 10 | 48.49 (40.27, 76.24) | 32.21 (29.80, 41.80) | 24.79 (22.33, 28.14) | 35.37 (31.08, 37.94) |
| PPE+CaCL2 group | 10 | 17.39 (13.66, 23.73) | 15.44 (10.27, 19.15) | 18.92 (16.22, 22.80)# | 21.48 (17.28, 23.95) |
| PPE group | 10 | 28.42 (22.21, 39.56) | 21.57 (11.68, 26.02) | 25.08 (22.64, 27.29) | 23.76 (19.60, 25.59)# |
| PPE+BNPA group | 10 | 14.78 (13.07, 15.66) | 10.75 (9.14, 13.57) | 16.64 (11.89,20.58)# | 17.28 (15.66, 20.30) |
The measurement data were expressed by M (P25, P75); M, Median; P25, 1st quartile; P75, 3rd quartile;
: P < 0.05,
: P < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 3Histopathological changes of abdominal aortas in rats. (A) Representative pictures of HE staining in each group; (B) Representative pictures of EVG staining in each group; (C) Representative pictures of Masson staining in each group; (D) Representative pictures of SMA-IHC staining in each group. ⋆: Indicates thrombosis; ▴: Indicates interlayer; ▾: Indicates elastic fibre; ♦: Indicates collagen fibre; •: Indicates smooth muscle cells.
Figure 4Infiltration of inflammatory cells in the abdominal aorta wall of rats. (A–D) Representative pictures of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CD68, CD20, CD3, and OX-62 cells; (E) CD68, CD20, CD3, and OX-62 cell count analysis. *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01 compared with the PPE group; n = 10.
Figure 5Expression and activity of MMP2 and MMP9 in the abdominal aorta wall of rats. (A) Typical Western blot analysis of MMP9 and MMP2 protein expression in each group; (B) Typical zymogram analysis of MMP9 and MMP2 protein activities in each group; (C) Quantitative analysis of relative expression of MMP2 and MMP9mRNA, n = 6; (D) Quantitative analysis of relative expression of MMP2 and MMP9 protein, n = 4; *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01 compared with the PPE group; #: P < 0.05, ##: P < 0.01 compared with the control group.