Literature DB >> 35282179

A novel dataset of predictors of mortality for older Veterans living with type II diabetes.

Avi U Vaidya1, Gabriel A Benavidez2, Julia C Prentice3,4, David C Mohr4,5, Paul R Conlin6,7, Kevin N Griffith1,8.   

Abstract

The dataset summarized in this article includes a nationwide prevalence sample of U.S. military Veterans who were aged 65 years or older, dually enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration and traditional Medicare and had a previous diagnosis of diabetes (diabetes mellitus) as of December 2005 (N = 275,190) [1]. Our data were originally used to develop and validate prognostic indices of 5- and 10-year mortality among older Veterans with diabetes. We include various potential predictors including demographics (e.g., sex, age, marital status, and VA priority group), healthcare utilization (e.g., # of outpatient visits, # days of inpatient stays), medication history, and major comorbidities. This novel dataset provides researchers with an opportunity to study the associations between a large variety of individual-level risk factors and longevity for patients living with diabetes.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Medical care; Mortality prediction; Veterans; Veterans Health Administration

Year:  2022        PMID: 35282179      PMCID: PMC8904241          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table

Value of the Data

Clinical practice guidelines for diabetes treatment state that treatment goals should account for patients’ comorbidities and life expectancy. However, there are currently no nationwide, publicly available datasets of longevity for patients with diabetes (diabetes mellitus). The uncertainty of life expectancy for older adults with diabetes can make it difficult for clinicians to work with individual patients to develop ideal treatment plans. Our data provide a unique opportunity for researchers to estimate longevity and identify mortality risk-factors for patients living with diabetes. Findings may then be used to inform clinicians and patients as they participate in shared decision-making and set individualized treatment goals.

Data Description

Approximately 34.2 million Americans currently live with diabetes, of which Type II diabetes (diabetes mellitus) is the most common [2]. Diabetes is associated with increased mortality and an increased risk for other conditions including kidney disease, retinopathy, dementia, nerve damage, and high blood pressure [3]. Potential treatments include lifestyle modifications, oral antihyperglycemic medications, or insulin therapy. Clinical practice guidelines suggest that patients’ life expectancy should be taken into account when developing individualized treatment plans [4,5]. However, there are a dearth of long-term data and clinical risk prediction tools for life expectancy among patients living with diabetes. We obtained administrative data from 2004 to 2016 for a prevalence sample of Veterans who were dually enrolled with the Veterans Health Administration and traditional Medicare, aged 65 years or older, and had a prior diagnosis of diabetes. The VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) contains data for every enrolled Veteran including outpatient and inpatient health services utilization, medication history, laboratory tests, diagnosis and procedure codes, and demographic information. Data are captured if a Veteran has an encounter at a VHA facility or with a community-based provider at VHA expense [6]. We also obtained Medicare Standard Analytic Files [7] for the same time period to obtain dates of death and to ensure we had a more comprehensive view of utilization and health conditions. The characteristics of Veterans in our dataset are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of older Veterans living with diabetes (N = 275,190) from 2004 to 2005.

VariableCount (%)
Age (years)
 65–6949,501 (18.0)
 70–7485,680 (31.1)
 75–7973,389 (26.7)
 80–8450,957 (18.5)
 85–8914,230 (5.2)
 90+1433 (0.5)
Male272,037 (98.9)
Race
 White238,067 (86.5)
 Black28,442 (10.3)
 Other8681 (3.2)
VHA Priority Group
 1, 4 (high disability)32,511 (11.8)
 2, 3, 6 (non-compensable/low/moderate disability)31,870 (11.6)
 5 (low income)105,228 (38.2)
 7, 8 (higher income)105,581 (38.3)
Insulin Users42,927 (15.6)
Deaths within 5 years65,171 (23.7)
Deaths within 10 years157,620 (57.3)

VariableMedian ± SD

Number of outpatient visits within 2 years30.9 ± 26.9
Number of inpatient days within 2 years2.4 ± 18.8
Hemoglobin A1c (%)7.1 ± 1.2
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)30.0 ± 5.1
Quan-Elixhauser Comorbidity Index4.8 ± 2.4

Notes: Patient baseline characteristics were determined from VA administrative data 2004–2005.

Baseline characteristics of older Veterans living with diabetes (N = 275,190) from 2004 to 2005. Notes: Patient baseline characteristics were determined from VA administrative data 2004–2005.

Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

We used SQL to query the VHA CDW and identify patients with either two outpatient visits or one inpatient visit with an ICD-9 code for diabetes (362.0X, 357.2, 250.X, 366.41) or a prescription for a diabetes medication (excluding metformin-only) during calendar year 2004–2005 [8]. The sample was then limited to those patients who met the following criteria; (1) alive and aged 65 or older as of December 31, 2005; (2) present in the Medicare Vital Status File (enrolled in Medicare); (3) enrolled in traditional Medicare during 2004–2005 (excluding Medicare Advantage [Part C]); and (4) were engaged in care at the VHA. This last criterion was defined as having at least one primary care visit during 2004–2005 with records for routine biomarkers (i.e., blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1C). Our final sample included 275,190 Veterans; a sample selection flowchart is presented in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Sample selection flowchart.

Sample selection flowchart. Predictor variables were selected based on their demonstrated associations with mortality among patients living with diabetes in previous research. Data were extracted from the following CDW tables: SPatient.Spatient – gender, marital status PatSub.PatientRace – race PatSub.PatientEthnicity – ethnicity Vital.VitalSign – mean systolic & diastolic bp (outpatient only), height, weight Inpatient.Inpatient/Fee.FeeInpatInvoice – count of inpatient days Outpat.Visit – count of outpatient visits RxOut.RxOutpat – medication history Chem.PatientLabChem – lab test orders and results Outpat.VDiagnosis/Inpat.InpatientDiagnosis/Fee.FeeInpatInvoice/Fee.FeeServiceProvider – International Classification of Disease 9 (ICD-9) codes Outpat.VProcedure/Inpat.InpatientCPTProcedure/Fee.FeeServiceProvided – Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes Patient.Enrollment – priority group, a measure of eligibility for VHA benefits based on service-related disabilities, environmental exposures, or economic hardships [9]. Veterans’ gender, age, dates of death, and enrolment in either traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage was determined using Medicare's Master Beneficiary Summary Files. ICD-9 codes, CPT codes, counts of inpatient days, and outpatient visits were also extracted from Medicare's MedPAR and Carrier files. From the CDW, we also extracted Veterans’ priority group, demographics, ICD-9 codes, CPT codes, counts of inpatient days, and outpatient visits. Veterans’ priority group, age, sex, marital status, race, and ethnicity were retrieved as of December 31, 2005. Priority groups 1 and 4 constitute those with serious service-related disabilities (greater than 50% disability or housebound); groups 2, 3, and 6 are those with non-compensable, low, or moderate disabilities; group 5 comprises those with economic hardships; and groups 7 and 8 have no service-related disabilities and household incomes above certain thresholds. Our dataset also includes binary indicators for whether a Veteran was alive at the five-year mark (December 31, 2011), or at the ten-year mark (December 31, 2016). We used a two-year lookback period (January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005) to identify Veterans’ comorbidities, health services utilization, medication history, and select measures of diabetes complications. We included a variety of predictors that have been previously associated with mortality in either older adults or people living with diabetes [10]. Measures of prior health services utilization included counts of inpatient days and outpatient visits. We included binary variables indicating whether Veterans were prescribed sulfonylureas, meglitinides, metformin, thiazolidinediones, α-glucosidase inhibitors, insulin, or antihypertensive medications (e.g., β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antihypertensive combinations). ICD-9 and CPT codes were used to create binary indicators for Quan-Elixhauser comorbidities [11] as well as end-stage liver disease, major depression, coronary artery disease, acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary interventions [12], nicotine dependence or smoking cessation, retinopathy, hyperglycemia, lower-limb amputation, and diabetic foot infections [13]. We used CPT codes to create indicators of screenings for retinopathy and ankle-brachial indices [14]. A frailty index ranging from 0 to 1 was also created using 30 variables identified from ICD-9 or CPT codes related to morbidity (e.g., arthritis), functional status (e.g., need for durable medical equipment), cognition and mood (e.g., dementia), sensory impairment (e.g., hearing impairment), or other conditions (e.g., incontinence) [15]. Biomarkers (e.g., BMI, blood pressure, A1C) were calculated as the mean of all measurements during the baseline period Table 2 displays a complete list of included variables and their coded classifications.
Table 2

Data dictionary.

Variable descriptionVariable nameCoding
Age (in years)AGERaw value
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor prescriptionALPHA0=No, 1=Yes
Biguanide prescriptionBIGUAN0=No, 1=Yes
Body mass index (BMI)BMIRaw value
Diastolic blood pressureDIASTOLICRaw value
Enrollment priorityPRIORITY1=Priority group 1 (50% of more service-connected disability), 2=Priority group 2 (30–40% service-connected disability), 3=Priority group 3 (10–20% service-connected disability), 4=Priority group 4 (catastrophically disabled/housebound), 5=Priority group 5 (economic hardship), 6=Priority group 6 (no service-connected disability, specific exposures during service, other), 7/8 = Priority groups 7 or 8 (those without service-connected disabilities or economic hardship)
Frailty indexFRAILTYFRAILTY: The frailty index indicates presence or absence of thirty age-related deficits in health. Deficits were identified using ICD-9 and CPT codes. An individual's frailty was calculated as a ratio of their total health decrements divided by the total possible (30).
HDL cholesterolHDLRaw value
Hemoglobin A1cA1CRaw value
Inpatient daysN_IPCount of inpatient days
Insulin prescriptionINSULIN0=No, 1=Yes
LDL cholesterolLDLRaw value
Marital statusMARRIED1=Married, 2=Single, 3=Widowed
MortalityDEATH_5DEATH_10DEATH_5: 0 if alive as of 31 December 2011, 1 otherwiseDEATH_10: 0 if alive as of 31 December 2016, 1 otherwise
Other diabetes medicationOTHER_MED0=No, 1=Yes; part of VA drug class HS5XX excluding drugs in other medication categories
Outpatient visitsN_OPCount of unique visits
RaceRACE1=White, 2=Black, 3=Other
Serum albuminSERUMALBRaw value
Serum creatinineSERUMCRERaw value
SexSEX0=female, 1=male
Sulfonylurea prescriptionSULF0=No, 1=Yes
Systolic blood pressureSYSTOLICRaw value
Thiazolidinedione prescriptionTZD0=No, 1=Yes
TriglyceridesTRIRaw value
Urine microalbuminMICROALBRaw value

The following comorbidities were assigned a value of 1 if the relevant diagnosis/procedure codes were present, 0 otherwise:

Acute myocardial infarctionAMI410.x, 411.0, 427.5, 412.x (ICD-9)
AIDS/HIVHIV042.x-044.x (ICD-9)
Alcohol abuseALCOHOL265.2, 291.1–291.3, 291.5–291.9, 303.0, 303.9, 305.0, 357.5, 425.5, 535.3, 571.0–571.3, 980.x, V11.3 (ICD-9)
Ankle-brachial indexABI93,922, 93,923, 93,924 (CPT)
Blood loss anemiaBLOODLOSS280 (ICD-9)
Cardiac arrhythmiasARRHYTHMIA426.0, 426.13, 426.7, 426.9, 426.10, 426.12, 427.0–427.4, 427.6–427.9, 785.0, 996.01, 996.04, V45.0, V53.3 (ICD-9)
Chronic pulmonary diseasePULMONARY416.8, 416.9, 490.x-505.x, 506.4, 508.1, 508.8 (ICD-9)
CoagulopathyCOAG286.x, 287.1, 287.3–287.5 (ICD-9)
Congestive heart failureCHF398.91, 402.01, 402.11, 402.91, 404.01, 404.03, 404.11, 404.13, 404.91, 404.93, 425.4–425.9, 428.x (ICD-9)
Coronary arterial diseaseCAD414.01, 414.00, 414.04, 414.03, 414.06, 404.02, 414.05 (ICD-9)
Deficiency anemiaANEMIA280.1–280.9, 281.x (ICD-9)
DepressionDEPRESSION296.2, 296.3, 296.5, 300.4, 309.x, 311 (ICD-9)
Diabetes, complicatedDMCX250.4–250.9 (ICD-9)
Diabetic foot infectionsFEET040.0, 440.24, 785.4, 730.07, 730.17, 730.27, 730.97, 440.23, 707.14, 707.15, 707.1, 680.7, 682.7, 681.1, 681.10, 681.11 (ICD-9), 75,710,75,716, 75,630, 75,600, 75,605, 75,625, 11,044, 10,060, 10,061, 20,000, 20,005 (CPT)
Drug abuseDRUGS292.x, 304.x, 305.2–305.9, V65.42 (ICD-9)
End-stage liver disease for cirrhosis or alcoholic fatty liverESLD571.2, 571.5, 571.6, 571.0, 571.1, 572.2, 572.3, 572.4 (ICD-9)
Fluid & electrolyte disordersFLUIDSLYTES253.6, 276.x (ICD-9)
HyperglycemiaHYPERG250.3, 250.8, 251.0, 251.1, 251.2, 270.3, 775.0, 775.6, 962.3 (ICD-9)
Hypertension, complicatedHTNCX402.x-405.x (ICD-9)
Hypertension, uncomplicatedHTN401.x (ICD-9)
HypothyroidismHYPOTHYROID240.9, 243.x, 244.x, 246.1, 246.8 (ICD-9)
Liver diseaseLIVER070.22, 070.23, 070.32, 070.33, 070.44, 070.54, 070.6, 070.9, 456.0–456.2, 570.x, 571.x, 572.2–572.8, 573.3, 573.4, 573.8,573.9, V42.7 (ICD-9)
Lower limb amputationAMPUTATIONV49.71-V49.77, V52.1 (ICD-9), 27,888, 28,800–28,805, 27,290, 27,598, 27,880–27,886, 27,590–27,592, 27,290–27,295,27,594–27,596, 26,910, 28,810–28,825 (CPT)
LymphomaLYMPHOMA200.x-202.x, 203.0, 238.6 (ICD-9)
Metastatic cancerMETS196.x-199.x (ICD-9)
ObesityOBESITY278 (ICD-9)
Other neurological disordersNEUROOTHER331.9, 332.0, 332.1, 333.4, 333.5, 333.92, 334.x335.x, 336.2, 340.x, 341.x, 345.x, 348.1, 348.3, 780.3, 784.3 (ICD-9)
ParalysisPARALYSIS334.1, 342.x, 343.x, 344.0- 344.6, 344.9 (ICD-9)
Peptic ulcer disease excluding bleedingPUD531.7, 531.9, 532.7, 532.9, 533.7, 533.9, 534.7, 534.9 (ICD-9)
Percutaneous coronary interventionsPCI92,920, 9291, 92,924, 92,925, 92,928, 92,929, 92,933, 92,934, 92,937, 92,938, 92,941, 92,943, 92,944, 92,973, 92,980, 92,981, 92,982, 92,984, 92,995, 92,996 (CPT)
Peripheral vascular disordersPVD093.0, 437.3, 440.x, 441.x, 443.1–443.9, 447.1, 557.1 557.9, V43.4 (ICD-9)
PsychosesPSYCHOSES293.8, 295.x, 296.04, 296.14, 296.44, 296.54, 297.x, 298.x (ICD-9)
Pulmonary circulation disordersPHTN415.0, 415.1, 416.x, 417.0, 417.8, 417.9 (ICD-9)
Renal failureRENAL403.01, 403.11, 403.91, 404.02, 404.03, 404.12, 404.13, 404.92, 404.93, 585.x, 586.x, 588.0, V42.0, V45.1, V56.x (ICD-9)
RetinopathyRETINOPATHY250.5x, 362.0, 379.23, 362.01–362.07 (ICD-9)
Retinopathy screeningRETSCREEN92,250, 99,243, 92,227, 92,228 (CPT)
Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseasesRHEUMATIC446.x, 701.0, 710.0–710.4, 710.8, 710.9, 711.2, 714.x, 719.3, 720.x, 725.x, 728.5, 728.89, 729.30 (ICD-9)
Severe depressionSEVERE_DEP296.3, 298.0, 300.4 (ICD-9)
SmokingSMOKER305.01, 649.x, 989.84, V15.82 (ICD-9), 99,406, 99,407, S9075, S9453, G0436, G0437 (CPT)
Solid tumor without metastasisTUMOR140.x-172.x, 174.x-195.x (ICD-9)
Valvular diseaseVALVULAR093.2, 394.x-397.x, 424.x, 746.3–746.6, V42.2, V43.3 (ICD-9)
Weight lossWEIGHTLOSS260.x-263.x, 783.2, 799.4 (ICD-9)
Data dictionary. For completeness and reproducibility, we have included SQL scripts that were used to extract raw data from the VHA CDW, an R script to prepare the analytic file, and the R script used to estimate the mortality risk prediction models. Pre-processed, deidentified data files are also available in CSV, Stata (.dta), and R (.rds) formats. We note several limitations with these data. First, our determination of diabetes status may include a small amount of misclassification. The criteria we used to identify patients with diabetes based on VHA electronic health records have been previously validated, achieving high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (98%) compared to patients’ self-reported health status [8]. Second, we obtained administrative data from both VHA and Medicare, but our data do not capture health services utilization from other payers. Lastly, while the CDW incorporates death records from several federal sources, a small number of Veteran deaths may remain unreported.

File inventory

SQL scripts to extract data from the VHA CDW. R statistical code to pre-process the data. R statistical code to estimate mortality risk prediction models. Deidentified individual-level datasets of mortality and patient characteristics (processed).

Ethics Statement

The study was reviewed and approved by the VA Boston Health Care System's Institutional Review Board (protocol #1584905-2). A waiver of informed consent was granted for this database-only study, with identifiable information limited to the minimum required to complete the study. Contacting patients to provide informed consent, in addition to being infeasible due to sample size, would thus increase the risks associated with a breach of confidentiality. Release of deidentified datasets was also authorized as part of this publication. The Privacy Office of the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System have certified these datasets are de-identified and may be publicly released as part of this publication.

Data Availability

A Novel Dataset of Predictors of Mortality for Older Veterans Living with Type II Diabetes (Original data) (Mendeley Data).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Avi U. Vaidya: Writing – review & editing. Gabriel A. Benavidez: Writing – review & editing. Julia C. Prentice: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. David C. Mohr: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Paul R. Conlin: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Kevin N. Griffith: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

David Mohr, Paul Conlin, and Kevin Griffith are investigators at the VA Boston Healthcare System. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the VHA, which did not have editorial input or control over this research. Thus, the views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
SubjectEndocrinology, diabetes and metabolism
Specific subject areaPotential demographic and clinical predictors of mortality for elderly veterans living with diabetes
Type of dataPre-processed data filesR statistical codeSQL scriptsTablesFigures
How data were acquiredData on Veterans’ demographics, clinical characteristics, medication history, prior health services utilization, and dates of death were obtained by querying the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW).
Data formatPre-processed
Parameters for data collectionWe identified a prevalence sample of Veterans with diabetes who were alive, aged ≥ 65 and enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as of January 1, 2006. Veterans were excluded if they were enrolled in Medicare Advantage (Part C) or did not have at least one primary care visit during 2004–2005 with records for routine biomarkers (i.e., blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1C).
Description of data collectionAll data were accessed directly from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse using SQL queries, deidentified, and then reported at the individual-level.
Data source locationVHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW)https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/vinci/cdw.cfm
Data accessibilityRepository name: Mendeley DataData identification number:https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/kn8v3678n9Instructions for accessing these data: Pre-processed data files and R statistical code are publicly available for direct download.
Related research articleGriffith KN, Prentice JC, Mohr DC, & Conlin PR. (2020) Predicting 5- and 10-Year mortality risk in older adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 43(8):1724–1731. doi:10.2337/dc19-1870.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous coronary interventions in the diabetic patient: where do we stand?

Authors:  John A Bittl
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Predicting 5- and 10-Year Mortality Risk in Older Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Kevin N Griffith; Julia C Prentice; David C Mohr; Paul R Conlin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Who has diabetes? Best estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Department of Veterans Affairs based on computerized patient data.

Authors:  Donald R Miller; Monika M Safford; Leonard M Pogach
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Diabetes complications severity index and risk of mortality, hospitalization, and healthcare utilization.

Authors:  Bessie Ann Young; Elizabeth Lin; Michael Von Korff; Greg Simon; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Siobhan Everson-Stewart; Leslie Kinder; Malia Oliver; Edward J Boyko; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  The Burden of Frailty Among U.S. Veterans and Its Association With Mortality, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Ariela R Orkaby; Lisa Nussbaum; Yuk-Lam Ho; David Gagnon; Lien Quach; Rachel Ward; Rachel Quaden; Enzo Yaksic; Kelly Harrington; Julie M Paik; Dae H Kim; Peter W Wilson; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djousse; Kelly Cho; Jane A Driver
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Abnormally Low or High Ankle-Brachial Index Is Associated with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus Patients.

Authors:  Szu-Chia Chen; Pi-Jung Hsiao; Jiun-Chi Huang; Kun-Der Lin; Wei-Hao Hsu; Yu-Li Lee; Mei-Yueh Lee; Jer-Ming Chang; Shyi-Jang Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.