Yunlong Li1, Qi You1, Ziyang Wang1, Ying Cao1, Christopher J Butch1, Nida El Islem Guissi1, Huiming Cai1,2, Yiqing Wang1, Qian Lu1,3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. 2. Department of Research and Development Center, Nanjing Nuoyuan Medical Devices Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs, Chinese Ministry of Education, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the relationship between the fluorescence intensity of indocyanine green (ICG) in near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery (NIRFGS) and preoperative liver function indicators. Methods: A total of 12 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were used for model establishment. Intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of 20% carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) corn oil solution (50 µL) was given to mice in the liver injury model group, 24 hours after injection, the model was established, while the control group received 0% CCl4 corn oil solution (50 µL) (n=6 for each group). Additionally, doses of 8 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg of free ICG were injected intravenously (i.v.) (n=3 in each group). Fluorescence was imaged in vivo using an NIR fluorescence imaging system at different time points (1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) after injection. Results: The absolute fluorescence intensity of mice in the liver injury model group was stronger than that in the control group. Mice in the liver injury model group had the same clearance rate of ICG from the tumor as normal mice. However, the background clearance rate was slower than that of normal mice, which prolonged the optimal tumor to background ratio (TBR) time. Correlation analysis was also used to determine which preoperative liver function parameters were most correlated with hepatic ICG clearance. Conclusions: Liver injury does not significantly affect the maximum TBR, but prolongs the optimal TBR time, and at the same time, a wider and more stable surgical window will appear. This study showed that a prolonged surgical start time is feasible according to preoperative liver function testing using NIR fluorescence imaging technology. 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Background: This study aimed to explore the relationship between the fluorescence intensity of indocyanine green (ICG) in near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery (NIRFGS) and preoperative liver function indicators. Methods: A total of 12 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were used for model establishment. Intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of 20% carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) corn oil solution (50 µL) was given to mice in the liver injury model group, 24 hours after injection, the model was established, while the control group received 0% CCl4 corn oil solution (50 µL) (n=6 for each group). Additionally, doses of 8 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg of free ICG were injected intravenously (i.v.) (n=3 in each group). Fluorescence was imaged in vivo using an NIR fluorescence imaging system at different time points (1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) after injection. Results: The absolute fluorescence intensity of mice in the liver injury model group was stronger than that in the control group. Mice in the liver injury model group had the same clearance rate of ICG from the tumor as normal mice. However, the background clearance rate was slower than that of normal mice, which prolonged the optimal tumor to background ratio (TBR) time. Correlation analysis was also used to determine which preoperative liver function parameters were most correlated with hepatic ICG clearance. Conclusions: Liver injury does not significantly affect the maximum TBR, but prolongs the optimal TBR time, and at the same time, a wider and more stable surgical window will appear. This study showed that a prolonged surgical start time is feasible according to preoperative liver function testing using NIR fluorescence imaging technology. 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery (NIRFGS); individual administration; liver function; tumor to background ratio (TBR)
Cancer is a major threat to human health, with an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases and nearly 10 million cancer deaths worldwide in 2020 (1). At present, surgical removal remains a mainstay for the cure and control of most solid cancers (2). The survival of patients with tumors depends on the ability to perform a complete resection. Surgeons use ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and other means to facilitate early detection, improve diagnostic accuracy and staging, and improve preoperative planning (3). In the common practice of surgical resection, surgeons rely on their senses of sight and touch to delineate the margin between the tumor and surrounding normal tissues. Approximately 40% of surgeries show signs of residual tumor cells in the surgical cavity after resection due to surgeons’ subjective impressions (4,5). Thus, more sophisticated techniques are desired for attaining more precise determinations of tumor margins to diminish recurrence rates after surgery.Near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery (NIRFGS) is one of the most promising techniques for precise surgical navigation of tumor excision, which offers a better distinction between cancerous and normal tissues compared to surgeries relying on the senses of sight and touch of a surgeon. The most dominant light absorbing substances in tissues are hemoglobin (including oxyhemoglobin and reduced hemoglobin) and water molecules. The absorption coefficient of hemoglobin and water molecules in a segment of NIR region of 650–900 nm (now known as NIR I) is 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than that in other regions (6). The low absorption coefficient also means that NIR light will not destroy the structure of biomolecules like ultraviolet (uv) light and does not harm normal tissues. NIR fluorescence can effectively avoid the auto-fluorescence of biological tissues, thereby improving the TBR, with the advantages of deep penetration depth and high safety (7-9). NIRFGS mainly uses indocyanine green (ICG) as the contrast agent, the only NIR fluorescent tracer approved by both the Chinese and US Food and Drug Administrations (CFDA and FDA) for clinical use (10,11). The mechanism of NIR fluorescence-guided surgery is the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect (EPR) of tumors (12): ICG binds to proteins (mainly albumin) in plasma after i.v. into the human body to form nanostructures with a size of 4–6 nm. The new blood vessels in the tumor have holes that can be passed by nanoparticles because of incomplete structure, so the tumor has high permeability for nanostructured substances; and the lymphatic system in the tumor is scarce and lymphatic reflux dysfunction makes the nano-sized substances easily enter the tumor tissue and are not easily removed by lymphatic reflux, making the dye accumulation in the tumor higher than that in the normal tissue. Troyan et al. conducted a clinical trial of sentinel lymph node (SLN) tracing for breast cancer using the FLARE device in 2009 (13), and the first NIR fluorescence navigation surgery had very successful imaging results. With the development of the technology, the detection rate of SLNs can reach up to 95% (14). Subsequently, this technique has achieved outstanding results in a variety of tumor types, such as liver cancer (15,16), lung cancer (17-19), and colorectal cancer (20). However, under the same ICG injection dose, the time of optimal TBR varies between different individuals (21-23). As the only metabolic organ of ICG, the liver’s ability to metabolize ICG directly determines the trend of TBR (21,24). Some researchers proposed that the preoperative period may be related to the degree of liver cirrhosis in patients (25), but there is no feasible NIR indicator dosing regimen to ensure that patients can obtain a good TBR according to preoperative liver function indicators. In this study, we artificially created different degrees of liver injury by injecting different concentrations of CCl4 into mice (), and the objectives were: (I) to determine preoperative liver function indicators related to hepatic ICG metabolic capacity; (II) to predict the relationship between optimal TBR time and hepatic ICG metabolic capacity. This study provides us with a scientific basis and principles for the development of individualized dosing regimens for NIRFGS in the future, has the potential to solve key problems affecting the development and clinical application of NIRFGS, and promotes the progress of the precise surgical treatment of tumors. We present the following article in accordance with the ARRIVE reporting checklist (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-21-6975/rc).
Figure 1
Scheme of the live imaging and workflow. i.p., intraperitoneal injection; i.v., Intravenous injection.
Scheme of the live imaging and workflow. i.p., intraperitoneal injection; i.v., Intravenous injection.
Methods
Cell cultures
The human breast cancer cell line 4T1 was purchased from Jiangsu KeyGEN BioTECH Corp., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Cells were cultured according to the vendors’ recommendations. The choice of tumor cells was not restricted, 4T1 was chosen because it is a murine cell with high invasiveness and metastasis, making it easier to establish a tumor model.
Mouse model
Experiments were reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee (AEWC) of Nanjing University (Approval No. IACUC-2105007), in compliance with Institutional Committee of Nanjing University guidelines for the care and use of animals. Female mice (6 weeks old, 18±2 g, Jiangsu Jicuaiyaokang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) received subcutaneous injection of 4T1 cells (5×106) in the right hind limb. For 4T1, the prevalence was higher and more general in female mice. Tumor volume was calculated as π/6 × length × (width)2, and mice with tumors of about 500 mm3 in size were selected for in vivo studies.
Establishment of the liver injury model induced by CCl4 in mice
Animals in the injury group were given an intraperitoneal injection of 20% CCl4 corn oil solution (0.5 µL/g, n=3 for each group). The control group received a subcutaneous injection of corn oil (50 µL). The feeding conditions of the above animals were the same, with free access to food and water.
Detection of liver function indicators
Mice were fasted for 24 h the day before the end of the experiment, and blood samples (100–200 µL) were taken from the orbit after anesthesia to measure 8 liver function indicators: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), direct bilirubin (DBIL), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), and total bile acid (TBA). Blood samples were collected from mice and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 4 min twice to obtain serum. The above 8 liver function indicators were measured. The specific steps were performed according to the instructions of the kit.
ICG injection and NIR fluorescence imaging
ICG was purchased from Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Dandong, China). Doses of 8 and 1 mg/kg free ICG were injected via the tail vein (n=9 in each group). Mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of 2% sodium pentobarbital, and fluorescence was imaged in vivo using an FLI-10B fluorescence navigation system (Nanjing Nuoyuan Medical Devices Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) at different time points (1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h) after injection (Figure S1). Imaging was performed 72 h post-injection to determine the fluorescence in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, and tumor tissue. After imaging ex vivo, frozen and hematoxylin and eosin-stained 4-µm-thick tissue sections of the tumor and liver were evaluated histopathologically.
Statistical analysis
Calculation of TBR
Five points were selected on both the tumor tissue and normal tissue 2 cm from the tumor boundary for the fluorescence images. TBR was calculated as follows: TBR = average fluorescence intensity of tumor/average fluorescence intensity of normal tissue.
Correlation analysis
Since the fluorescence intensity of the tumor was continuously decaying after 1 h, the fluorescence intensity of the tumor and background tissue at 1 h was defined as I0 (I0-t, I0-b). The correlation relationships between I0, half-life, and the 8 liver function indicators were assumed to be linear due to the small sample size. When multiple factors might have had a simultaneous impact on measurements (e.g., multiple liver function indicators), we used multiple linear regression to construct a linear correlation between 2 variables.
Results
In vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging
In this study, ICG injection doses were 8 and 1 mg/kg (n=6 in each group). At each dose, 20% CCl4 was intraperitoneally injected to establish the liver injury model, as well as 0% CCl4 in the control group (n=3 in each group). The results are shown in .
Figure 2
Tumor and organ images of mice in the imaging groups at different times. (A) Mice administered 8 mg/kg and 20% CCl4 were imaged at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h after injection, white light images and merged images; (B) mice administered 8 mg/kg and 0% CCl4 were imaged after injection, white light images and merged images; (C) mice administered 1 mg/kg and 20% CCl4 were imaged after injection, white light images and merged images; (D) mice administered 1 mg/kg and 0% CCl4 were imaged after injection, white light images and merged images.
Tumor and organ images of mice in the imaging groups at different times. (A) Mice administered 8 mg/kg and 20% CCl4 were imaged at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h after injection, white light images and merged images; (B) mice administered 8 mg/kg and 0% CCl4 were imaged after injection, white light images and merged images; (C) mice administered 1 mg/kg and 20% CCl4 were imaged after injection, white light images and merged images; (D) mice administered 1 mg/kg and 0% CCl4 were imaged after injection, white light images and merged images.As shown in , intravenous injection of 8 mg/kg of ICG and intraperitoneal injection of 20% CCl4 in corn oil solution resulted in a much higher fluorescence intensity of the tumor than the surrounding tissues, with the best tumor imaging effect and the clearest tumor boundary (the optimal TBR =3.496±0.259).Intravenous injection of 8 mg/kg of ICG and intraperitoneal injection of 0% CCl4 in corn oil () showed higher contrast, relatively better tumor imaging, and relatively clear tumor boundary (the optimal TBR =3.807±0.259).Intravenous injection of 1 mg/kg of ICG and intraperitoneal injection of 20% CCl4 in corn oil () resulted in poor tumor imaging and weak fluorescence intensity (the optimal TBR =1.521±0.270).Intravenous injection of 1 mg/kg of ICG and intraperitoneal injection of 0% CCl4 in corn oil () resulted in the lowest tumor imaging effect, weak fluorescence, and invisible tumors (the optimal TBR =1.629±0.308).Therefore, the analysis focused on the 8 mg/kg ICG injection dose group in the subsequent experiments. Fluorescence intensity data and images were acquired using an FLI-10B imaging system ().
Optimal tumor visualization time for ICG NIRFGS
The effect of the ICG dose on tumor imaging was first assessed, and the TBR curve was plotted for the high- and low-dose groups (8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4
vs. 1 mg/kg, 0% CCl4) (). It was found that the TBR 4–72 h after ICG injection at the dose of 8 mg/kg was greater than 2, with good clinical visibility. However, the TBR of the 1 mg/kg dose group was <2 at all time points. Therefore, the high-dose group had a better imaging effect and better TBR from the perspective of the mean value of TBR and image visibility (). Thereafter, the analysis focused on the high-dose group. The TBR of the 20% CCl4 model group still showed an increasing trend until 72 h after ICG injection (TBR =3.496±0.259), while the TBR of the 0% CCl4 control group reached the peak value at 24 h after ICG injection (TBR =3.807±0.259), and then showed a decreasing trend. Considering the TBR and the width of the surgical window, it was found that although the TBR value of the high-dose liver injury model group was slightly lower than that of the control group within 72 h after ICG injection, it had a wider and more stable imaging window.
Figure 3
Comparison of TBR at different doses and degrees of liver injury. (A) TBR at different time points in groups of 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 and 1 mg/kg, 0% CCl4. The former showed better TBR. (B) TBR at different time points in the 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 groups. The former had a wider clinical TBR window. TBR, tumor to background ratio.
Comparison of TBR at different doses and degrees of liver injury. (A) TBR at different time points in groups of 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 and 1 mg/kg, 0% CCl4. The former showed better TBR. (B) TBR at different time points in the 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 groups. The former had a wider clinical TBR window. TBR, tumor to background ratio.
Effect of liver injury on tumor and background fluorescence decay rate
For the 8 mg/kg high-dose ICG injection group, there was no significant difference in the tumor fluorescence intensity decay rate and half-life between the 20% CCl4 liver injury model group and the control group (). However, there was a significant difference in the background fluorescence intensity decay rate and half-life (), and the background fluorescence decay rate of the 20% CCl4 liver injury model group was slower than that of the control group.
Figure 4
Normalized comparison of tumor fluorescence intensity and background fluorescence intensity for different degrees of liver injury at high dose. (A) Comparison of normalized fluorescence intensities at different time points in tumors injected with 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4. Liver injury did not affect the rate of fluorescence intensity decay in tumors. (B) Comparison of normalized fluorescence intensities at different time points in the background of the 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 dose groups. Liver injury decreases the rate of fluorescence intensity decay of the background.
Normalized comparison of tumor fluorescence intensity and background fluorescence intensity for different degrees of liver injury at high dose. (A) Comparison of normalized fluorescence intensities at different time points in tumors injected with 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4. Liver injury did not affect the rate of fluorescence intensity decay in tumors. (B) Comparison of normalized fluorescence intensities at different time points in the background of the 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 dose groups. Liver injury decreases the rate of fluorescence intensity decay of the background.summarizes the absolute tumor and background fluorescence intensities of the liver injury model group and the control group at 8 time points after 8 mg/kg high-dose ICG injection. It can be seen that the I0-T and I0-B of the liver injury model group were significantly higher than those of the control group. For ease of comparison, we normalized all absolute fluorescence intensities to visually confirm the conclusions of .
Table 1
Absolute fluorescence intensity and normalized values of tumor and background at different time points
Time /h
Tumor. FL (8, 20%)
Normalization (8, 20%)
Tumor. FL (8, 0%)
Normalization (8, 0%)
Background. FL (8, 20%)
Normalization (8, 20%)
Background. FL (8, 0%)
Normalization (8, 0%)
1
185.67
1.00
127.33
1.00
166.80
1.00
103.80
1.00
2
165.67
0.89
109.87
0.86
139.33
0.84
69.53
0.67
4
128.69
0.69
87.01
0.68
90.31
0.54
44.43
0.43
8
95.10
0.51
67.37
0.53
53.25
0.32
23.50
0.23
12
68.84
0.37
52.22
0.41
29.86
0.18
16.37
0.16
24
43.80
0.24
30.61
0.24
16.14
0.10
8.04
0.08
48
30.97
0.17
22.52
0.18
9.46
0.06
6.05
0.06
72
23.78
0.13
18.17
0.14
6.78
0.04
5.27
0.05
FL, fluorescence intensity; FL, fluorescence intensity; 8, 20% means 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4; 8, 0% means 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4.
FL, fluorescence intensity; FL, fluorescence intensity; 8, 20% means 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4; 8, 0% means 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4.
Correlation between liver function indicators and ICG metabolism
The classical chemical liver injury model was established by intraperitoneal injection of 20% CCl4 corn oil solution. It was found that for the high-dose injection group at 8 mg/kg, there were significant differences in the concentrations of ALT, AST, ALP, and TBA liver function indicators in the liver injury model control group, demonstrating that CCl4 has the ability to damage liver function (). We correlated all 8 liver function indicators with I0-T, I0-B, and topt one by one to obtain Pearson correlation coefficients and P values for each indicator with I0-T, I0-B, and topt, respectively ().
Figure 5
Liver function indicators were measured in the 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 dose groups. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBIL, direct bilirubin; TBIL, total bilirubin; ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltransferase; TBA, and total bile acid.
Table 2
Correlation analysis between I0-T, I0-B and topt and eight liver function indicators
Parameters
ALT
AST
DBIL
TBIL
ALB
ALP
γ-GT
TBA
I0-T
P=0.001
P=0.002
P=0.009
P=0.368
P=0.343
P=0.013
P=0.229
P=0.002
r=0.962
r=0.953
r=−0.889
r=−0.178
r=−0.213
r=0.865
r=0.380
r=0.945
I0-B
P=0.006
P=0.013
P=0.008
P=0.440
P=0.338
P=0.000
P=0.243
P=0.010
r=0.912
r=0.864
r=−0.894
r=0.081
r=−0.220
r=0.985
r=0.358
r=0.884
topt
P=0.008
P=0.013
P=0.09
P=0.294
P=0.372
P=0.22
P=0.104
P=0.010
r=0.894
r=0.866
r=−0.796
r=−0.282
r=−0.172
r=0.825
r=0.600
r=0.884
P is significance, r is the Pearson correlation coefficient, topt is t (TBR optimal). TBR, tumor to background ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBIL, direct bilirubin; TBIL, total bilirubin; ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltransferase; TBA, and total bile acid.
Liver function indicators were measured in the 8 mg/kg, 20% CCl4 and 8 mg/kg, 0% CCl4 dose groups. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBIL, direct bilirubin; TBIL, total bilirubin; ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltransferase; TBA, and total bile acid.P is significance, r is the Pearson correlation coefficient, topt is t (TBR optimal). TBR, tumor to background ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DBIL, direct bilirubin; TBIL, total bilirubin; ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT, γ-glutamyltransferase; TBA, and total bile acid.
Discussion
The hepatic clearance of ICG
After intravenous injection, ICG binds to ALB in the blood to form 4–6 nm nanoparticles which accumulate inside the tumor tissue through the EPR effect (9,20,26-28). Additionally, lymphatic reflux inside the tumor tissue is blocked, while ICG in the blood is selectively absorbed by hepatocytes and then excreted unchanged into the bile through an ATP-dependent transport system (29). Our previous study showed that higher dose results in a better imaging effect (30), and when the injection dose reached 8 mg/kg, the accumulation of ICG in the tumor basically reached saturation, but the TBR was the highest. The dose (≥8 mg/kg) far exceeded the average hepatic saturation dose, and TBR decreased due to slow metabolism in normal tissues. In this study, our main objective was to assess the effect of liver injury on the injected dose and optimal TBR time. The 8 mg/kg ICG group had better compositional imaging and clearer tumor borders than the 1 mg/kg group. Injection of 1 mg/kg in mice when liver function was impaired still could not effectively distinguish the tumor boundary. We suspect that the low dose of ICG did not reach its saturated metabolic range even if liver function was impaired when the low dose was injected. We obtained good imaging results after damaging the liver function of mice with 20% CCl4, and the absolute fluorescence intensity of the tumor was increased, while the tumor boundary was clearer (TBR =3.807±0.0430). At the 8 mg/kg dose, the optimal TBR time point of mice in the liver injury model group was at 72 h, while the optimal TBR of mice in the normal liver function group appeared at 24 h, and this can be explained based on . We observed that liver function impairment was associated with ICG accumulation in the liver and an enhancement in ICG tumor fluorescence intensities, which was associated with impaired liver function reducing the metabolic rate of ICG. While ICG circulating time did not seem to be affected by liver injury, ICG tumor retention was basically the same for all groups. This affirms our hypothesis that the optimal TBR time is prolonged in the case of liver injury. Further optimisation experiments covering wider time points and dose ranges are needed in order to obtain a standardized protocol.
Advantages of NIRFGS
Before NIR imaging is used for biological imaging, there have been a variety of rich imaging means for research and clinical use, including MRI, CT and nuclear tomography. These existing imaging methods cannot be used for intraoperative real-time navigation due to factors such as bulky equipment, less resolution than optical imaging, expensive tracers, detection sensitivity, or radiation damage to the human body. NIR fluorescence, on the other hand, can effectively avoid the autofluorescence of biological tissues, thereby increasing the signal-to-background ratio. Because of the advantages of large penetration depth, high signal-to-background ratio and high biosafety, NIR fluorescence imaging is expected to be used for intraoperative real-time navigation (6-10).
Advantages of CCl4 in establishing the liver injury model
After subcutaneous injection of CCl4 corn oil solution with volume fraction of 40%, CCl4 enters mice and can be metabolized by hepatocytes to produce trichloromethyl radicals and chloride radicals, which can induce oxidative stress, loss of enzyme function, peroxidation of the cell membrane, and ultimately liver cell injury (31,32). CCl4-induced acute liver injury in murine models is widely used to investigate potential therapeutic strategies due to its similarities with acute chemical liver injury in humans (33-36). Recently, Zhu et al. demonstrated that hepatic HMGB1 expression played a critical role in CCl4-induced acute liver injury (37). Chen et al. found that the most severe liver injury occurred at 24 h (38) and normalized in the following 48–72 h. Therefore, liver function slowly recovers after 24 h, and the gradual removal of ICG from the blood prolongs the optimal TBR time. Therefore, we chose to establish the liver injury model by intraperitoneal injection with 20% CCl4 corn oil solution in mice, while the detection results of liver function parameters also confirmed the successful establishment of the liver injury model.
Analysis of liver function indicators assisted individualized dosing regimen
It has been reported that certain liver function parameters detected preoperatively are closely related to the metabolism of ICG. For example, it has been reported that the high bilirubin and bile acid levels in cases of liver injury could affect ICG metabolism in a competitive manner as they share the same class of membrane transporters (39,40). Cholestasis affects the speed of ICG clearance, while γ-GT and ALP are related to cholestasis (41), so they are also related to the metabolic capacity of hepatic ICG. In addition, some clinical liver function scores (such as Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na, etc.) and other indicators which indirectly reflect liver function (such as platelet count, hyaluronic acid, hepatitis, etc.) have also been shown to be related to hepatic ICG excretion. These indicators can reflect the liver metabolism of ICG without ICG injection. Therefore, by using the relationship between preoperative liver function indicators and ICG metabolism, we established a regression analysis model to determine 4 preoperative liver function indicators which are significantly related to the TBR optimal time of ICG metabolism, namely ALT (P<0.01), AST (P<0.05), ALP (P<0.05), and TBA (P<0.05). The levels of AST and ALT are higher in liver cells and these factors are released into the blood when liver cells are damaged or die, reflecting the liver function situation. ICG is transported to the liver via serum ALB and excreted unchanged via the biliary tract. Therefore, bilirubin has a competitive, inhibitory relationship with ICG. This means that when TBA increases, it may inhibit the rate of ICG transport to the liver and affect the excretion of ICG. This is the first study to analyze the relationship between liver function indicators and ICG metabolism, which establishes a foundation for assisting doctors to develop individualized dosing regimens for patients according to liver function in the future, with high reliability and practicability.
Limitations of this study
In the future, we need to expand the sample size and also need to establish a variety of animal orthotopic tumor models. There is a need to establish a quantitative relationship between liver function and liver ICG metabolic capacity, which should be verified in clinical surgery.
Conclusions
This study reveals the relationship between liver excretion and optimal TBR time. Impairment of liver function will not significantly affect the maximum TBR, but will prolong the optimal TBR time. The specific liver injury can be judged based on preoperative liver function tests, and is especially correlated with ALP, AST, ALP, and TBA. When these 4 preoperative liver function parameters are elevated, it means that the excretion of ICG will be hindered, prolonging the optimal TBR time during surgery, and a wider and more stable surgical window will appear at the same time. This study showed that prolonged surgical start time is feasible according to preoperative liver function testing using NIR fluorescence imaging technology.The article’s supplementary files as
Authors: Brian Madajewski; Brendan F Judy; Anas Mouchli; Veena Kapoor; David Holt; May D Wang; Shuming Nie; Sunil Singhal Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joost R van der Vorst; Boudewijn E Schaafsma; Merlijn Hutteman; Floris P R Verbeek; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Henk H Hartgrink; Vincent T H B M Smit; Clemens W G M Löwik; Cornelis J H van de Velde; John V Frangioni; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Elizabeth L Jewell; Juan Juan Huang; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Ginger J Gardner; Carol L Brown; Yukio Sonoda; Richard R Barakat; Douglas A Levine; Mario M Leitao Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Meena S Moran; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Seema A Khan; Janet Horton; Suzanne Klimberg; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Gary Freedman; Nehmat Houssami; Peggy L Johnson; Monica Morrow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Susan L Troyan; Vida Kianzad; Summer L Gibbs-Strauss; Sylvain Gioux; Aya Matsui; Rafiou Oketokoun; Long Ngo; Ali Khamene; Fred Azar; John V Frangioni Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David Holt; Olugbenga Okusanya; Ryan Judy; Ollin Venegas; Jack Jiang; Elizabeth DeJesus; Evgeniy Eruslanov; Jon Quatromoni; Pratik Bhojnagarwala; Charuhas Deshpande; Steven Albelda; Shuming Nie; Sunil Singhal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240