| Literature DB >> 35281875 |
Pan Xiao1, Zhaolai Hua2, Xiaoyu Kang1, Bin Lu3, Meifeng Li1, Juan Wu1, Wei Dong1, Junfeng Zhang1, Chun Cheng1.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common digestive tract tumor in China, and oral intaking habit has a great influence on the development of EC. The present study explored the correlation between oral intaking habit and tongue coating (TC) microbiota in patients with esophageal precancerous lesions (EPL) to provide a reasonable interpretation of the influence of oral intaking habit on microbial alterations in the EPL.Entities:
Keywords: bile acid; esophageal precancerous lesions; microbiota; oral intaking habit; tongue coating
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281875 PMCID: PMC8899384 DOI: 10.7150/jca.67068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Clinical characteristics of EPL patients and Controls
| Characteristics | Controls | EPL patients (n=123) | t/χ2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 58.99±7.18 | 59.71±6.43 | 0.889 a | 0.375 | |
| BMI | 24.82±3.29 | 24.44±2.64 | 1.080 a | 0.281 | |
| Gender | Male | 96(54.5%) | 71(57.7%) | 0.297 b | 0.586 |
| Female | 80(45.5%) | 52(42.3%) | |||
| Smoking status | Never | 113(64.2%) | 81(65.9%) | 11.690 b | 0.009 |
| Seldom | 7(4.0%) | 1(0.8%) | |||
| Often | 1(0.6%) | 8(6.5%) | |||
| Daily | 55(31.3%) | 33(26.8%) | |||
| Drinking status | Never | 91(51.7%) | 60(48.8%) | 10.290 b | 0.016 |
| Seldom | 45(25.6%) | 18(14.6) | |||
| Often | 14(8.0%) | 11(8.9%) | |||
| Daily | 26(14.8%) | 34(27.6%) | |||
| Preference for salty food | Never | 27(15.3%) | 13(10.6%) | 3.490 b | 0.322 |
| Seldom | 109(61.9%) | 72(58.5%) | |||
| Often | 23(13.1%) | 24(19.5%) | |||
| Daily | 17(9.7%) | 14(11.4%) | |||
| Preference for fried food | Never | 54(30.7%) | 24(19.5%) | 4.777 b | 0.092 |
| Seldom | 118(67.0%) | 95(77.2%) | |||
| Often | 4(2.3%) | 4(3.3%) | |||
| Regularly taking meals | Seldom | 4(2.3%) | 2(1.6%) | 0.377 b | 0.828 |
| Often | 17(9.7%) | 10(8.1%) | |||
| Daily | 155(88.1%) | 111(90.2%) | |||
| Drinking tea status | Never | 96(54.5%) | 53(43.1%) | 6.033 b | 0.110 |
| Seldom | 42(23.9%) | 44(35.8%) | |||
| Often | 12(6.8%) | 6(4.9%) | |||
| Daily | 26(14.8%) | 20(16.3%) | |||
| Hp-infection status | Positive | 72(40.9%) | 50(40.7%) | 0.002 b | 0.964 |
| Negative | 104(59.1%) | 73(59.3%) | |||
a Refers to students' t test, b refers to Chi-square test.
Alpha diversity analysis between EPL patients and controls [Median (P25, P75)]
| Ace | Chao | Shannon | Simpson | Observed OTUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls (n=176) | 1483(1242,1790) | 1425(1185,1575) | 3.967(3.793,4.175) | 0.049(0.040,0.062) | 982.5(821.5,1098) |
| EPL patients (n=123) | 1478(1223,1729) | 1366(1165,1569) | 3.943(3.746,4.150) | 0.050(0.041,0.065) | 947.0(807.0,1078) |
| Z( | 0.754(0.451) | 0.705(0.481) | 0.890(0.373) | 0.454(0.650) | 1.079(0.281) |
Different analysis of predictive functions between EPL patients and Controls
| Functions | Controls (n=176) | EPL patients (n=123) | Z( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Butirosin and neomycin biosynthesis | 0.0500±0.0089 | 0.0477±0.0074 | 2.102(0.036) |
| Streptomycin biosynthesis | 0.3210±0.0207 | 0.3165±0.0210 | 2.089(0.037) |
| Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis-lacto and neolacto series | 0.0001±0.0001 | 0.0001±0.0001 | 2.036(0.042) |
| Thiamine metabolism | 0.4896±0.0249 | 0.4961±0.0215 | 2.482(0.013) |