Literature DB >> 35281649

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of ethoxyquin (6-ethoxy-1,2-dihydro-2,2,4-trimethylquinoline) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Vasileios Bampidis, Giovanna Azimonti, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Henrik Christensen, Birgit Dusemund, Mojca Fašmon Durjava, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Secundino López Puente, Francesca Marcon, Baltasar Mayo, Alena Pechová, Mariana Petkova, Fernando Ramos, Yolanda Sanz, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Ruud Woutersen, Antonio Finizio, Ivana Teodorovic, Gabriele Aquilina, Georges Bories, Jurgen Gropp, Carlo Nebbia, Jordi Tarrés-Call, Matteo Innocenti.   

Abstract

Ethoxyquin is synthetised from p-phenetidine, a possible mutagen, which remains in the additive as an impurity at concentrations of < 2.5 mg/kg additive. Ethoxyquin is considered safe for all animal species at the proposed inclusion level of 50 mg/kg complete feed. However, owing the presence of p-phenetidine, no safe level of the additive in feed for long-living and reproductive animals could be identified. The FEEDAP Panel derived a health-based guidance value of 0.006 mg ethoxyquin dimer (EQDM)/kg bw per day and applied it to the sum of ethoxyquin and its transformation products. A maximum total concentration of 50 mg ethoxyquin/kg complete feed for all animal species, except dairy ruminants, would not pose a risk for the consumer. However, in the absence of data on p-phenetidine residues in tissues and products of animal origin, no conclusion on the safety for the consumer could be drawn. The conclusions on consumer safety assume that the maximum total concentration of 50 mg EQ/kg feed is expressed as the sum of EQ, EQDM, EQI and DHEQ. Exposure of the unprotected user to p-phenetidine via inhalation should be minimised. No safety concerns for groundwater are expected. It is not possible to conclude on the safety of EQ for the terrestrial compartment. A risk for the aquatic compartment cannot be excluded when ethoxyquin is used in terrestrial animals. Unacceptable risk is not expected for freshwater sediment-dwelling organisms. A risk of secondary poisoning via the terrestrial food chain is not expected, whereas a risk via the aquatic food chain cannot be excluded. No concerns for aquatic organisms are expected for ethoxyquin used in fish farmed in land-based system, a risk cannot be excluded for marine sediment dwelling organisms when ethoxyquin is used in sea-cages. Ethoxyquin is considered efficacious in the range 25-50 mg/kg complete feed.
© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antioxidant; ethoxyquin; ethoxyquin quinone imine; genotoxicity; p‐phenetidine; safety; toxicity

Year:  2022        PMID: 35281649      PMCID: PMC8892239          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  5 in total

1.  Comprehensive characterization of ethoxyquin transformation products in fish feed by traveling-wave ion mobility spectrometry coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Noelia Negreira; Jorge Regueiro; Stig Valdersnes; Marc H G Berntssen; Robin Ørnsrud
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.

Authors:  Vasileios Bampidis; Maria Bastos; Henrik Christensen; Birgit Dusemund; Maryline Kouba; Mojca Kos Durjava; Marta López-Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Francesca Marcon; Baltasar Mayo; Alena Pechová; Mariana Petkova; Fernando Ramos; Yolanda Sanz; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Ruud Woutersen; Theo Brock; Joop de Knecht; Boris Kolar; Patrick van Beelen; Laura Padovani; Jordi Tarrés-Call; Maria Vittoria Vettori; Giovanna Azimonti
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2019-04-05

3.  Identification of ethoxyquin and its transformation products in salmon after controlled dietary exposure via fish feed.

Authors:  Sylvain Merel; Jorge Regueiro; Marc H G Berntssen; Rita Hannisdal; Robin Ørnsrud; Noelia Negreira
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 7.514

4.  Use of (Q)SAR genotoxicity predictions and fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for priority ranking of ethoxyquin transformation products.

Authors:  J D Rasinger; F Frenzel; A Braeuning; A Bernhard; R Ørnsrud; S Merel; M H G Berntssen
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.

Authors:  Anthony Hardy; Diane Benford; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Michael John Jeger; Katrine Helle Knutsen; Simon More; Alicja Mortensen; Hanspeter Naegeli; Hubert Noteborn; Colin Ockleford; Antonia Ricci; Guido Rychen; Vittorio Silano; Roland Solecki; Dominique Turck; Marc Aerts; Laurent Bodin; Allen Davis; Lutz Edler; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Salomon Sand; Wout Slob; Bernard Bottex; Jose Cortiñas Abrahantes; Daniele Court Marques; George Kass; Josef R Schlatter
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2017-01-24
  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Seaweed Phenolics as Natural Antioxidants, Aquafeed Additives, Veterinary Treatments and Cross-Linkers for Microencapsulation.

Authors:  Tharuka Gunathilake; Taiwo O Akanbi; Hafiz A R Suleria; Tim D Nalder; David S Francis; Colin J Barrow
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.085

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.