Literature DB >> 3528133

Clinical relevance of the bioavailability/bioequivalence controversy.

L A Gottschalk.   

Abstract

A generic drug containing the same active ingredient as a brand name drug may not show identical clinical efficacy. There is increasing evidence that substitution of a generic for a brand name (or vice versa) drug with the expectation of similar results is problematic and that improper treatment may result. Clinical trials are needed to test generic psychoactive drugs. This paper provides guidelines for clinical situations in which problems relating to bioavailability and bioequivalence may arise, for example, in patients taking concomitant medication(s) or in chronically ill or elderly patients. In addition, the importance of knowing which assay methods are used to measure psychoactive drug blood levels in considering drug efficacy is stressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3528133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  1 in total

Review 1.  Generic antiarrhythmic drugs: what constitutes equivalency.

Authors:  D G Benditt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.