| Literature DB >> 35281173 |
Niva Mahapatra1, Krishna Devi Uma Rao2, Kannan Ranganathan2, Elizabeth Joshua2, Rooban Thavarajah2.
Abstract
Context: Oral cancer is the 8th most common cancer in the world. An important feature of carcinogenesis is angiogenesis. Endoglin is a powerful marker of neovascularization in solid malignancies. This study was done to ascertain its role as an indicator of metastasis and prognosis. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the expression of endoglin (CD105) in metastatic primary tumor, lymph node of the metastasized tumor, nonmetastatic primary tumor and in normal buccal mucosa immunohistochemically. Settings and Design: The total sample size comprised 45 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, n = 10 metastasized primary tumor, n = 10 lymph nodes of metastasized primary tumor, n = 20 nonmetastasized oral squamous cell carcinoma and n = 5 normal buccal mucosa were studied. Subjects andEntities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; endoglin; microvessel density; oral squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281173 PMCID: PMC8859600 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_13_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Figure 1Hematoxylin and eosin-stained positive control tissue – tonsil. (×100) (a) and (×400) (b) respectively. Endoglin staining seen on the membranes of blood vessels in tonsil (×100) (c) and (×400) (d), respectively
Demographic data and habit distribution among study group
| Group I ( | Group III ( | Group IV ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 80 | 80 | 60 | 0.615 |
| Female | 20 | 20 | 40 | |
| Age (years) | ||||
| 0-25 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0.053 |
| 25-50 | 70 | 25 | 40 | |
| 51 and above | 30 | 75 | 0 | |
| Habits | ||||
| Drinking alcohol | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.817 |
| Smoking tobacco/cigarette | 10 | 5 | 0 | |
| Chewing tobacco/areca nut | 10 | 20 | 0 | |
| Alcohol and smoking | 40 | 10 | 0 | |
| Smoking and chewing | 10 | 10 | 0 | |
| Drinking and chewing | 20 | 15 | 0 | |
| Alcohol, chewing, smoking | 0 | 15 | 0 | |
| No habits | 10 | 20 | 100 |
Distribution of histopathologic grading between primary site of metastasizing oral squamous cell carcinoma (Group I), primary site of nonmetastasizing oral squamous cell carcinoma (Group III)
| Histological grading | Study groups |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Group I ( | Group III ( | ||
| Well differentiated | 2 (20) | 20 (100) | 0.000 |
| Moderately | 4 (40) | 0 | |
| Poor | 4 (40) | 0 | |
Comparison of endoglin-positive vessels among Group I and Group III
| Study groups | Mean±SD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Group I ( | 0.68±0.10 | 0.001 |
| Group III ( | 0.45±0.20 |
SD: Standard deviation
Comparison of endoglin-positive vessels by tissue localization between Group I and Group III
| Regions | Study groups (mean±SD) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Group I ( | Group III ( | ||
| Intratumoral | 0.73±0.12 | 0.57±0.18 | 0.022 |
| Peritumoral | 0.67±0.10 | 0.55±0.18 | 0.039 |
| Resection margin | 0.62±0.10 | 0.45±0.20 | 0.002 |
SD: Standard deviation
Comparison of endoglin-positive vessels by tissue localization in draining lymph node of metastasized primary tumor (Group II)
| Regions | Mean±SD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hilar region | 0.57±0.13 | 0.009 |
| Capsular region | 0.37±0.07 |
SD: Standard deviation
Figure 2(a) Endoglin-positive vessels in the intra, peri and resection margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma with metastasis (×100), (b) Endoglin-positive vessels with aberrant morphology in oral squamous cell carcinoma with metastasis (×400), (c) endoglin-positive vessels in the invasive front of oral squamous cell carcinoma without metastasis (×100), (d) endoglin-positive vessels with complex architecture (×400), (e) and (f) endoglin-positive vessels in the lymph node of the metastasized primary tumor (×100) and (×400), respectively