| Literature DB >> 35281100 |
Lei Ye1, Yuntian Chen1, Hui Xu1, Zhaoxiang Wang2, Haixia Li3, Jin Qi4, Jing Wang4, Jin Yao1, Jiaming Liu2, Bin Song1.
Abstract
Background: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) instillation is recommended postoperatively after transurethral resection of bladder cancer (TURBT) in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). An accurate prediction model for the BCG response can help identify patients with NMIBC who may benefit from alternative therapy. Objective: To investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) radiomics features in predicting the response to BCG instillation among patients with primary high-risk NMIBC.Entities:
Keywords: BCG immunotherapy; CECT images; NMF (nonnegative matrix factorization); NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer); radiomics analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281100 PMCID: PMC8914064 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.814388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 2Workflow of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). (A) V represents the original data matrix as the combination of two matrices, V ∼ WH. The shape of V is M × N, M equals to the number of features and N equals to the number of samples. W is a matrix which contains the reduced number of k components derive from NMF, and the sub-classified features for each component (M). Matrix H has size k × N, with each of the M columns representing the metafeature pattern of the corresponding sample. (B) The most robust NMF of training cohort selected and tested k = 2 to k = 10, and the turning point was identified as k = 5. That is, NMF identified five components of radiomics features in the primary training cohort.
FIGURE 1Patient recruitment and study design.
Baseline characteristics of the patients in this study.
| Primary cohort ( | Validation cohort ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 66.0 ± 11.2 | 69.2 ± 10.8 | .196 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 82 (78.8) | 21 (20.2) | 0.256 |
| Female | 22 (21.2) | 3 (79.8) | |
| Concomitant CIS | .327 | ||
| No | 70 (67.3) | 18 (75) | |
| Yes | 34 (32.7) | 6 (25) | |
| Tumor focality | 0.522 | ||
| Unifocal | 51 (49.2) | 12 (50) | |
| Multifocal | 53 (50.8) | 12 (50) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.418 | ||
| <3 | 74 (71.2) | 16 (66.7) | |
| ≥3 | 30 (28.8) | 8 (33.3) | |
| Stage | <.001 | ||
| Ta | 58 (55.8) | 4 (16.7) | |
| T1 | 49 (44.2) | 20 (83.3) | |
| BCG failure | <.001 | ||
| No | 96 (88.9) | 13 (54.2) | |
| Yes | 12 (11.1) | 11 (45.8) | |
| Median total BCG instillations (IQR) | 19 (19–23) | 14 (9—16) | |
| Median total mos follow-up (IQR) | 24 (16–37) | 12 (7–21) | |
| Median mos time to BCG failure (IQR) | 9 (8—10) | 7 (5–10) |
BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; CIS, carcinoma in situ; IQR, inter-quartile range; SD, standard deviation.
FIGURE 3Illustration of component selection with NMF. (A) Patients were aggregated by NMF component using the mean across patients for each component, and the mean Z score for each feature was calculated, resulting in one Z score per feature per NMF component. (B) Heatmap of radiomics features. Z scores were calculated for each features. Samples are grouped by NMF components.
FIGURE 4Association between NMF component 3 and clinical outcomes in primary cohort. (A) ROC curve and the AUC for the predictive accuracy of NMF component 3 in predicting BCG failure in 1 year. (B) Confusion matrix presenting the predictive outcomes using NMF component 3 and true outcomes of BCG failure in 1 year. (C) With the component Z score of .2 as the cutoff, patients with scores <.2 (0) had significantly prolonged recurrence free survival (RFS) than those with scores >.2 (1), p < .005.
FIGURE 5External validation of NMF component 3. (A) ROC curve and the AUC for the predictive accuracy of NMF component 3 in predicting BCG failure in 1 year. (B) Confusion matrix presenting the predictive outcomes using NMF component 3 and true outcomes of BCG failure in 1 year. (C) With the component Z score of .2 as the cutoff, patients with scores <.2 (0) had significantly prolonged recurrence free survival (RFS) than those with scores >.2 (1), p = .04. (D) Calibration curve of the component 3. (E) Decision curve of component 3. The X-axis shows the cutoff value, while the Y-axis shows the net benefit.