| Literature DB >> 35280906 |
Jiaying Wei1, Qingshu Li2, He Wu3, Xuedong Yin1, Guosheng Ren1.
Abstract
Background: Hyperkeratosis of the nipple and areola (HNA) is a rare skin disease with unknown etiology. Some patients are misdiagnosed or never diagnosed, especially during the early stage of this disease. In addition, the mechanism involved in the development of HNA is still unknown, and genomic alterations have not been reported anywhere. Case Information: A 26-year-old female suffered gradual bilateral areola thickening and enlargement, with accompanying intense itching, and was diagnosed with HNA at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. No obvious abnormalities were found in laboratory test examinations such as hormone testing for estrogen, progesterone, or prolactin. Typical papillomatous skin with orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis and numerous infiltrating lymphocytes was detected through a histopathological examination. The results from RNA-sequencing showed that the molecular expression between HNA and a normal nipple and areola (NNA) was obviously different. No significant difference was found in the bilateral lesions. In addition, immune-related cell signaling pathways were overactivated in HNA compared to the control HNA.Entities:
Keywords: Dermatology; RNA-sequencing; genomic alteration; hyperkeratosis; hyperkeratosis of the nipples and areolae
Year: 2022 PMID: 35280906 PMCID: PMC8905514 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.781693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Characteristics of the patients included in the study (n = 121) by age.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Female ( | 1 (1.0%) | 19 (19.2%) | 42 (42.4%) | 29 (29.3%) | 4 (4.0%) | 3 (3.0%) | 1 (1.0%) |
|
| Male ( | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.5%) | 4 (18.2%) | 3 (13.6%) | 2 (9.1%) | 2 (9.1%) | 10 (45.5%) | |
|
| ||||||||
| Unilateral ( | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (20.0%) | 10 (28.6%) | 8 (22.9%) | 4 (11.4%) | 3 (8.6%) | 3 (8.6%) |
|
| Bilateral ( | 1 (1.2%) | 13 (15.1%) | 36 (41.9%) | 24 (27.9%) | 2 (2.3%) | 2 (2.3%) | 8 (9.3%) | |
|
| ||||||||
| Without ( | 1 (1.0%) | 20 (19.2%) | 41 (39.4%) | 29 (27.9%) | 5 (4.8%) | 3 (2.9%) | 5 (4.8%) |
|
| With ( | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (29.4%) | 3 (17.6%) | 1 (5.9%) | 2 (11.8%) | 6 (35.3%) | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| I ( | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (27.6%) | 11 (37.9%) | 7 (24.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.4%) | 2 (6.9%) |
|
| III ( | 1 (1.1%) | 12 (13.0%) | 35 (38.0%) | 25 (27.2%) | 6 (6.5%) | 4 (4.3%) | 9 (9.8%) | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| I ( | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (42.9%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (42.9%) |
|
| II ( | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (16.2%) | 23 (31.1%) | 25 (33.8%) | 4 (5.4%) | 3 (4.1%) | 7 (9.5%) | |
| III ( | 1 (2.5%) | 8 (20.0%) | 20 (50.0%) | 6 (15.0%) | 2 (5.0%) | 2 (5.0%) | 1 (2.5%) | |
Values are given as number (percentage).
Some P values were compared using χ.
Cut-off values of Levy-Tranckel classification were defined as follows: (1) epidermal nevus, with unilateral involvement of a single breast, usually in a Blaschko linear pattern (observed equally in both genders); (2) hyperkeratosis of the nipple and areola associated with ichthyosis, with bilateral involvement of the breasts (observed equally in both genders); and (3) a bilateral type, generally affecting both nipples and areolae and observed mainly in females in the second or third decade of life.
Cut-off values of Mehanna classification were defined as follows: (1) primary HNA occurring coincidentally with other dermatoses such as acanthosis nigricans, ichthyosis, or Darier's disease; (2) secondary HNA caused by hormonal changes, malignancies, or lymphoma; and (3) idiopathic HNA without any obvious cause.
Figure 1Clinical images and histological detection of hyperkeratosis of the nipple and areola (HNA). (A) Nevoid hyperkeratosis-like lesion of the nipple and areola in the right and left mammary areas. (B) Stained sections were observed under a fluorescence microscope magnification in the right and left mammary areas. Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×20 and ×100. The thin red arrow indicates immune cell infiltration in a significant number of samples. The thin green arrow indicates epidermal hyperplasia was also evident.
Figure 2Genomic expression detected by RNA-sequencing performed between the HNA and normal nipple and areola (NNA). (A) The heat map of the genomic expression cluster. Group S-L means the left mammary area. Group S-R means the right mammary area. Group normal means the mammary area from the normal patient. (B) The enrichment analysis aimed at detecting the variation of the cell signaling pathways and biological functions among different groups in the right and left mammary areas. (C) The gene expression of the lesions from both sides. The difference in gene expression between the lesions from both sides was not obvious, while the difference in gene expression between the lesions and healthy samples was obvious. (D) Keratins and their associated proteins are dysregulated in HNA compared to NNA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.