| Literature DB >> 35280585 |
A Awny1, Mona N Radwan1, M A Nour1, Sally S Fouda2, Sami A Al-Dhumri3, Soliman M Soliman4, Amira M El-Tahan5, Mohamed T El-Saadony6, Reham S A Faid-Allah1.
Abstract
It is very important to determine the amount of mechanical damage to biomass pellets during handling, transportation, and storage. However, it is difficult to determine the amount of damage to biomass pellets caused by existing external forces. However, a useful method is the finite element methods, which can be used in different engineering fields to simulate the posture of the material under defined boundary conditions. In this research, a drop test simulation of biomass pellet samples was performed by using the finite element method. An experimental study (compressive test) was carried out to measure some mechanical properties of the sample and use the obtained data in the finite element method simulation. The stress-strain curve of different biomass pellets was determined. Yield strength, Poisson's ratio, ultimate strength and modulus of elasticity, and stress were identified. In the end, the maximum equivalent stress, highest contact force (generated normal force from target surface at impact), and shape of deformation of samples at impact were obtained from simulation results. The drop scenario was created with 25 steps after the impact site, and the FEM simulation was solved. The maximum stress value was 9.486 MPa, and the maximum generated force was 485.31 N. at step 8 of the FEM simulation. When the stress magnitudes were assessed, simulation outputs indicated that simulation stress values are inconsistent with experimental data.Entities:
Keywords: Biomass pellets; Damage prediction; Finite element method; Mechanical properties
Year: 2021 PMID: 35280585 PMCID: PMC8913545 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
physical properties of biomass pellets.
| Biomass pellet | Sunflower | Saw dust | Mixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length, mm | 14.2 ± 4.3 | 17.4 ± 4.8 | 21.1 ± 7 |
| Diameter, mm | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 8.4 ± 0.1 | 8.4 ± 0.2 |
| Density, kg/m3 | 711 | 800 | 760 |
| Biomass pellet | Sunflower | Saw dust | Mixed |
Physical and mechanical properties of contact surface.
| Contact surface | Flexible |
|---|---|
| Normal stiffness, (N/mm)/m2 | 595,000,000,000 |
| Tangential stiffness, (N/mm)/m2 | 183,500,000,000 |
| Mass density, kg/m3 | 640 |
| Target thickness, mm | 20 |
Fig. 13D solid modelling, mesh construction and drop cases of biomass pellet.
Fig. 2The relationship between compressive stress and strain for different biomass pellets at axial and diametric orientations.
The results of pellets dropping test onto rigid surface.
| Pellets residual type | Pellet orientation (deg) | Dropping height (mm) | Maximum stress (MPa) | Difference(MPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted | Ultimate | ||||
| 5000 | 6.309 | 6.5 | 0.191 | ||
| 10,000 | 6.52 | 6.5 | −0.02 | ||
| 15,000 | 6.675 | 6.5 | −0.175 | ||
| 20,000 | 6.808 | 6.5 | −0.308 | ||
| 5000 | 6.653 | 7.5 | 0.847 | ||
| 10,000 | 7.206 | 7.5 | 0.294 | ||
| 15,000 | 7.363 | 7.5 | 0.137 | ||
| 20,000 | 7.752 | 7.5 | −0.252 | ||
| 5000 | 8.327 | 9.9 | 1.573 | ||
| 10,000 | 9.178 | 9.9 | 0.722 | ||
| 15,000 | 9.819 | 9.9 | 0.081 | ||
| 20,000 | 10.321 | 9.9 | −0.421 | ||
| 5000 | 5.048 | 5.5 | 0.452 | ||
| 10,000 | 5.411 | 5.5 | 0.089 | ||
| 15,000 | 5.893 | 5.5 | −0.393 | ||
| 20,000 | 6.51 | 5.5 | −1.01 | ||
| 5000 | 8.029 | 9.5 | 1.471 | ||
| 10,000 | 8.645 | 9.5 | 0.855 | ||
| 15,000 | 9.142 | 9.5 | 0.358 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.486 | 9.5 | 0.014 | ||
| 5000 | 4.181 | 4.1 | −0.081 | ||
| 10,000 | 4.543 | 4.1 | −0.443 | ||
| 15,000 | 5 | 4.1 | −0.9 | ||
| 20,000 | 5.332 | 4.1 | −1.232 | ||
The results of pellets dropping test onto flexible surface (Beech wood).
| Pellets residual type | Pellet orientation (deg) | Dropping height (mm) | Maximum stress (MPa) | Difference (MPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted | Ultimate | ||||
| 5000 | 5.785 | 6.5 | 0.715 | ||
| 10,000 | 6.283 | 6.5 | 0.217 | ||
| 15,000 | 6.353 | 6.5 | 0.147 | ||
| 20,000 | 6.726 | 6.5 | −0.226 | ||
| 5000 | 7.071 | 7.5 | 0.429 | ||
| 10,000 | 8.105 | 7.5 | −0.605 | ||
| 15,000 | 8.903 | 7.5 | −1.403 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.743 | 7.5 | −2.243 | ||
| 5000 | 8.091 | 9.9 | 1.809 | ||
| 10,000 | 8.507 | 9.9 | 1.393 | ||
| 15,000 | 8.926 | 9.9 | 0.974 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.854 | 9.9 | 0.046 | ||
| 5000 | 5.742 | 5.5 | −0.242 | ||
| 10,000 | 6.627 | 5.5 | −1.127 | ||
| 15,000 | 7.321 | 5.5 | −1.821 | ||
| 20,000 | 7.867 | 5.5 | −2.367 | ||
| 5000 | 7.589 | 9.5 | 1.911 | ||
| 10,000 | 8.118 | 9.5 | 1.382 | ||
| 15,000 | 8.475 | 9.5 | 1.025 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.011 | 9.5 | 0.489 | ||
| 5000 | 4.861 | 4.1 | −0.761 | ||
| 10,000 | 5.569 | 4.1 | −1.469 | ||
| 15,000 | 6.107 | 4.1 | −2.007 | ||
| 20,000 | 6.509 | 4.1 | −2.409 | ||
The results of pellets dropping test onto rigid and flexible surface.
| Pellets residual type | Pellet orientation (deg) | Dropping height (mm) | Contact force (N) | Max.res. displacement (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid | Flexible | Rigid | Flexible | |||
| 5000 | 227.02 | 134.07 | 0.308 | 0.564 | ||
| 10,000 | 312.21 | 203.94 | 0.428 | 0.759 | ||
| 15,000 | 365.98 | 259.34 | 0.524 | 0.900 | ||
| 20,000 | 406.16 | 296.31 | 0.609 | 1.041 | ||
| 5000 | 222.22 | 154.69 | 0.411 | 0.486 | ||
| 10,000 | 315.29 | 220.16 | 0.580 | 0.685 | ||
| 15,000 | 386.27 | 269.58 | 0.710 | 0.837 | ||
| 20,000 | 451.49 | 310.18 | 0.821 | 0.965 | ||
| 5000 | 263.56 | 144.99 | 0.338 | 0.514 | ||
| 10,000 | 368.53 | 207.24 | 0.455 | 0.717 | ||
| 15,000 | 442.41 | 260.33 | 0.520 | 0.846 | ||
| 20,000 | 496.70 | 306.85 | 0.576 | 0.954 | ||
| 5000 | 225.01 | 152.04 | 0.378 | 0.473 | ||
| 10,000 | 278.74 | 211.53 | 0.535 | 0.667 | ||
| 15,000 | 318.92 | 254.96 | 0.657 | 0.816 | ||
| 20,000 | 363.72 | 294.03 | 0.764 | 0.941 | ||
| 5000 | 253.37 | 140.29 | 0.322 | 0.524 | ||
| 10,000 | 356.19 | 204.22 | 0.437 | 0.727 | ||
| 15,000 | 430.19 | 258.80 | 0.496 | 0.864 | ||
| 20,000 | 485.31 | 307.54 | 0.536 | 0.977 | ||
| 5000 | 239.32 | 154.39 | 0.331 | 0.428 | ||
| 10,000 | 291.63 | 210.37 | 0.474 | 0.606 | ||
| 15,000 | 328.41 | 246.92 | 0.591 | 0.744 | ||
| 20,000 | 351.51 | 277.34 | 0.698 | 0.864 | ||
Fig. 3Contact force and maximum stress of the mixed pellet under drop steps.
Fig. 4A dropping test for a modelled mixed pellet in (0°) horizontal orientation dropped from 20000 mm on rigid target.