| Literature DB >> 35280548 |
Sana Naseer1, Javed Iqbal2, Abeel Naseer3, Sobia Kanwal4, Ishtiaq Hussain5, Yong Tan6, Liliana Aguilar-Marcelino7, Raquel Cossio-Bayugar7, Zbigniew Zajac8, Yousef A Bin Jardan9, Tariq Mahmood1,10.
Abstract
Despite advancement in modern medicines, plant derived medicines have still wide range utilities as they have less side effects and are cheap and biocompitable. Sassurea lappa is an extensively used plant in traditional medicinal formulations. Plant roots are used to cure various diseases including cancer, rheumatic pain, abdominal and nervous disorders. The present study was aimed for the evalution of biological potentials of methanolic and chloroform extracts of Saussurea lappa root, leaf, seed and flower. The methanolic and chloroform extracts were subjected to qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analyses. Identification of functional groups was performed using Fourier Transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Antioxidant potential was determined via diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), total reducing power (TRP) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) method, anti-hemolytic potential was conducted on human RBCs, antibacterial activity was evaluated against six American type culture collection (ATCC) and three multi drug resistance (MDR) strains, cytotoxic and phytotoxic potentials were evaluated through brine shrimp lethality assay and raddish seed assay respectively. Experiments were performed in triplicates and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied using statistics version-8.1. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of sixteen secondary metabolites. Fourteen functional groups were identified through FTIR. S. lappa root methanolic (SLRM) showed maximum antioxidant activity index (AAI-79.42%) whereas chloroform extract of leaves (SLLC) gave highest antibacterial activity with maximum zone of inhibition (ZOI) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.4 mm). Maximum cytotoxicity was observed for SLRM with lethal dose concentration (LC50) of 58.8 µg/mL. However, root extracts showed significant phytotoxicity (15% germination). The current study investigated that bioactive compounds present in S. lappa leaves, seed, flower and roots were responsible for enhanced biological potentials. Further studies on isolation and characterization of these bioactive compounds may help in drug development. In future, we recommend different in-vitro and in-vivo studies to further confirm it biopharmacological potencies.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-hemolytic; Antibacterial; Antioxidant; Cytotoxic; S. lappa
Year: 2022 PMID: 35280548 PMCID: PMC8913551 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of S. lappa.
| Phytochemicals | SLRM | SLLM | SLSM | SLFM | SLRC | SLLC | SLSC | SLFC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenols | ||||||||
| Flavonoids | ||||||||
| Alkaloids | ||||||||
| Terpenoids | ||||||||
| Saponins | ||||||||
| Tannins | ||||||||
| Glycoside | ||||||||
| Cardic Glycoside | ||||||||
| Steroid | ||||||||
| Phytosterol | ||||||||
| Coumarins | ||||||||
| Proteins | ||||||||
| Carbohydrates | ||||||||
| Anthocyanin | ||||||||
| β-cyanin | ||||||||
| Anthraquinone Glycosides | ||||||||
| Fats & Fixed Oils | ||||||||
| Quinone | ||||||||
| Emodins | ||||||||
| Phlobatnins |
+++ Highly present, ++ Moderately present, + Slightly present, - Absent.
Quantitative phytochemical analysis showed that S. lappa contains significant amount of total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoids content (TFC), β-carotene and lycopene (Table 2). The results revealed that among methanol extracts, highest phenolic content (75.71 ± 1.75 mg/g) was present in SLRM, while flavonoids (71.66 ± 1.72 mg/g), β-carotene (0.22 ± 0.01 mg/g) and lycopene (0.48 ± 0.03 mg/g) were predominant in SLLM. Among the chloroform extracts, SLLC showed highest values for phenolic (66.94 ± 1.05 mg/g), flavonoids (66.24 ± 1.25 mg/g) mg/g, β-carotene (0.57 ± 0.06 µg/mL) and lycopene content (0.90 ± 0.07 µg/mL) respectively.
Quantitative phytochemical analysis of S. lappa.
| Plant Extract | β-Carotene (mg/100 mL) | Lycopene (mg/100 mL) | TPC (Gallic Acid Eq. mg/g) | TFC (Quercetin Eq. mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLRM | 0.11 ± 0.01C | 0.12 ± 0.01CD | 75.71 ± 1.75 A | 70.01 ± 1.37 AB |
| SLLM | 0.22 ± 0.01B | 0.48 ± 0.03B | 61.77 ± 1.24 E | 71.66 ± 1.72 A |
| SLSM | 0.08 ± 0.02 D | 0.05 ± 0.01F | 69.58 ± 1.15B | 68.94 ± 1.14B |
| SLFM | 0.09 ± 0.02 D | 0.10 ± 0.06 DE | 51.76 ± 1.44 G | 64.88 ± 1.15C |
| SLRC | 0.17 ± 0.03C | 0.08 ± 0.02 EF | 64.49 ± 1.71 D | 65.33 ± 1.39C |
| SLLC | 0.57 ± 0.06 A | 0.90 ± 0.07 A | 66.94 ± 1.05C | 66.24 ± 1.25C |
| SLSC | 0.04 ± 0.02 D | 0.05 ± 0.01F | 54.66 ± 1.06F | 58.35 ± 1.29 D |
| SLFC | 0.07 ± 0.01 D | 0.18 ± 0.04C | 51.89 ± 1.09 G | 58.33 ± 1.27 D |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-G) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD).
Fig. 1FTIR analysis of methanolic extracts of S. lappa(A) SLRM (B) SLLM (C) SLSM (D) SLFM (E) SLRC (F) SLLC (G) SLSC (H) SLFC.
Fig. 2FTIR analysis of chloroform extracts of S. lappa(A) SLRC (B) SLLC (C) SLSC (D) SLFC.
DPPH IC50 (µg/mL) value of various extracts of S. lappa.
| Plant Extract | % Scavenging at different concentrations (µg/mL) | R2 | IC50 | 95% CI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31.25 | 62.5 | 125 | 250 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | ||||
| SLRM | 43.95 | 56.31 | 63.72 | 71.34 | 78.34 | 81.82 | 88.78 | 0.99 | 43.97 ± 0.74H | 36.87–52.45 |
| SLLM | 37.29 | 49.02 | 54.21 | 58.78 | 65.28 | 80.70 | 83.72 | 0.96 | 88.63 ± 0.69F | 60.76–129.3 |
| SLSM | 29.74 | 36.92 | 49.26 | 50.99 | 57.10 | 66.26 | 68.15 | 0.97 | 217.10 ± 0.55 D | 162.3–290.2 |
| SLFM | 24.19 | 35.37 | 43.97 | 51.43 | 59.44 | 62.43 | 64.67 | 0.95 | 277.80 ± 1.47B | 191.7–402.8 |
| SLRC | 41.87 | 50.25 | 57.95 | 63.27 | 68.26 | 80.75 | 85.89 | 0.97 | 66.07 ± 0.69 G | 48.74–89.56 |
| SLLC | 33.38 | 46.72 | 57.86 | 62.85 | 70.14 | 74.18 | 80.64 | 0.97 | 90.17 ± 0.95 E | 67.45–120.5 |
| SLSC | 28.87 | 35.34 | 49.01 | 54.99 | 59.87 | 61.98 | 65.28 | 0.92 | 224.50 ± 1.72C | 143.0–352.4 |
| SLFC | 24.25 | 31.28 | 45.39 | 51.45 | 56.16 | 60.87 | 62.33 | 0.92 | 324.50 ± 1.05 A | 205.0–513.7 |
| Standard * | 49.13 | 58.50 | 63.07 | 71.41 | 81.16 | 92.63 | 98.25 | 0.94 | 39.80 ± 0.09 I | 23.51–67.40 |
Results for IC50 are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-I) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD).
IC50 = Inhibition concentration fifty; CI = Confidence interval
* Standard = Ascorbic Acid
Fig. 3Total reducing power of S. lappa(A) Methanolic extracts (B) Chloroform extracts Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-O) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD).
Fig. 4Total antioxidant capacity of S. lappa(A) Methanolic extracts (B) Chloroform extracts. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-P) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD).
Fig. 5Antioxidant activity index (AAI %) of S. lappa root, leaf, seed and flower.
Fig. 6Anti-hemolytic activity of S. lappa (A) Methanolic extracts. (B) Chloroform extracts. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-P) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD).
MIC values (MIC µg/mL) and ZOI (mm ± SD) of S. lappa plant extracts against various bacterial strains.
| Bacterial Strains | SLRM | SLLM | SLSM | SLFM | SLRC | SLLC | SLSC | SLFC | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZOI | 13 ± 0.1 | 15 ± 0.1 | NI | NI | 13 ± 0.1 | 15 ± 0.1 | NI | NI | 20.16 | |
| MIC | 50 | 50 | – | – | 50 | 50 | – | – | 12.5 | |
| ZOI | 15 ± 0.1 | 19 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.1 | NI | 15 ± 0.1 | 21 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.1 | 11 ± 0.1 | 23.29 | |
| MIC | 50 | 25 | 50 | – | 50 | 12.5 | 50 | 100 | 12.5 | |
| ZOI | 12 ± 0.1 | 15 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 0.1 | NI | 12 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 0.1 | 13 ± 0.1 | NI | 22.47 | |
| MIC | 50 | 50 | 100 | – | 50 | 50 | 50 | – | 12.5 | |
| ZOI | 10 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 0.1 | NI | NI | 17 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 0.1 | NI | 8 ± 0.1 | 21.39 | |
| MIC | 100 | 100 | – | – | 25 | 50 | – | 100 | 12.5 | |
| ZOI | 10 ± 0.1 | 13 ± 0.1 | NI | NI | NI | 13 ± 0.1 | NI | NI | 19.42 | |
| MIC | 100 | 50 | – | – | – | 50 | – | – | 25 | |
| ZOI | 19 ± 0.1 | 16 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 0.1 | NI | 12 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.1 | NI | NI | 20.52 | |
| MIC | 25 | 25 | 100 | – | 50 | 100 | – | – | 12.5 | |
| ZOI | 13 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 0.1 | 10 ± 0.1 | 9 ± 0.1 | 16 ± 0.1 | 11 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.1 | 24.28 | |
| MIC | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 12.5 | |
| ZOI | 14 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 0.1 | NI | 13 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 0.1 | 21 ± 0.1 | 11 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 0.1 | 19.60 | |
| MIC | 50 | 50 | – | 100 | 25 | 12.5 | 100 | 50 | 25 | |
| ZOI | NI | NI | NI | NI | 12 ± 0.1 | 13 ± 0.1 | NI | 9 ± 0.1 | 20.67 | |
| MIC | – | – | – | – | 100 | 50 | – | 100 | 12.5 | |
ZOI: Zone of inhibition (mm ± SD); MIC: (µg/mL); NI: No inhibition; Control: Penicillin.
LC50 (µg/mL) of S. lappa plant extracts.
| Plant Extract | Mortality (%) probits at different doses (µg/mL) | R2 | LC50 | 95% CI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 20 | 40 | 80 | 100 | 250 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | ||||
| 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0.889 | 58.501 ± 0.62 D | 34.181–100.126 | |
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0.991 | 64.838 ± 1.19C | 40.233–104.489 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 0.925 | 241.554 ± 1.15 A | 161.907–360.383 | |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 0.979 | 87.745 ± 0.63B | 48.711–158.061 | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0.949 | 66.001 ± 0.80 D | 41.854–104.079 | |
| 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0.963 | 78.807 ± 1.93C | 50.210–123.693 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 0.929 | 328.698 ± 0.32 A | 179.951–600.400 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 0.966 | 156.583 ± 1.89B | 107.675–227.706 | |
Results for LC50 are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-E) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD). LC50 = Lethal concentration fifty; CI = Confidence interval
Fig. 7Phytotoxic activity of S. lappa(A) Phytotoxic effect of methanolic extracts on radish root length. (B) Phytotoxic effect of chloroform extracts on radish root length. (C) Percentage germination of radish seeds in methanolic extracts.(D) Percentage germination of radish seeds in chloroform extracts. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) each letter (A-K) represents level of significance at P < 0.05 (LSD).