Literature DB >> 35280449

Optimal configuration of a three-rod ortho-bridge system in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A finite element analysis.

Md Ariful Haque1, Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone2, Thomas Franchi3, Long Zhang1, Jing Qin1, Luyun Liu1, Yingjie Zhang4, Ying Xiong1, Tong Wu1, Jiayu Xiao1.   

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) represent an increasing clinical and economic burden. This study aims to determine the optimal configuration of a bridge-combined internal fixation system in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 PFF, using finite element analysis. Materials and methods: A three-rod ortho-bridge system (OBS) fixation model was used to evaluate the optimal configuration of four target parameters: position of the third rod; intersection angle between the proximal screws; connecting rod diameter; and number of screws used. Femoral displacement and the maximum von Mises stress of the OBS were used as the evaluation indices, to analyze the PFF and to determine the optimal use of an OBS. For each parameter, various candidate options were tested.
Results: Finite element analysis revealed that the rate of femoral displacement and the maximum von Mises stress of the OBS were at a minimum when there was a 35 mm downward movement of the third rod from the baseline. Therefore, the optimal position of third rod fixation was 35 mm below the fovea capitis of the femur. The optimal intersection angles between the proximal screws were found to be 71.92° or 84°. A 6 mm diameter connecting rod proved to be most effective. Configuration d, utilizing 7 screws, represented the most clinically appropriate screw number configuration, despite configuration f, utilizing 9 screws, eliciting the best evaluation indices.
Conclusion: An OBS used in the above-described configuration is well suited to the characteristics of PFF and provides an effective and reliable means for their treatment.
© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Internal fracture fixation; Periprosthetic femoral fractures; ortho-Bridge system

Year:  2022        PMID: 35280449      PMCID: PMC8907548          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  27 in total

1.  The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement.

Authors:  O H Brady; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP.

Authors:  Emanuel Gautier; Christoph Sommer
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Percutaneous cerclage wiring and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO): a percutaneous reduction technique in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Theerachai Apivatthakakul; C Phornphutkul; T Bunmaprasert; K Sananpanich; Alberto Fernandez Dell'Oca
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Periprosthetic BMD after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Toni Tapaninen; Heikki Kröger; Petri Venesmaa
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Periprosthetic Fractures About the Hip and Knee: Contemporary Techniques for Internal Fixation and Revision.

Authors:  Frank A Liporace; Erik N Kubiak; Brett Levine; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2018-02-15

7.  Incidence and Future Projections of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of International Registry Data.

Authors:  Robert Pivec; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Jeffery J Cherian; Aditya V Maheshwari; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2015

8.  Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients.

Authors:  Jagannath Chakravarthy; Rajeev Bansal; Julian Cooper
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey Pike; Darin Davidson; Donald Garbuz; Clive P Duncan; Peter J O'Brien; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  Periprosthetic femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: systematic analysis of the effect of stem design.

Authors:  Ashleen R Knutsen; Nicole Lau; Donald B Longjohn; Edward Ebramzadeh; Sophia N Sangiorgio
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.