Sahar Samieyan Dehkordi1, Seyed Hadi Mousavi2, Marzieh Ebrahimi3,4, S Haban Alizadeh1, Amir Abbas Hedayati Asl5,4, Monireh Mohammad5, Bahareh Aliabedi1. 1. Department of Hematology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Hematology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: hmousavi@tums.ac.ir. 3. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Email: m.ebrahimi@royan-rc.ac.ir. 4. Department of Regenerative Biomedicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous
class of aggressive hematopoietic malignancies with
abnormal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the blood
and bone marrow. AML leads to dysregulation and
activation of cellular cascades such as invasion and
migration. Invasiveness and resistance to therapy are
two main issues that challenge research and treatment of
refractory cancer (1). Some mechanisms of invasion and
migration are cell migration and motility, extracellular
matrix (ECM) destruction, and interaction with stromal
and other cells (2).The main problem is that the tumor cells, unlike
normal cells, do not stop the signaling pathways to
end this process, leading to the emergence of invasion
(3). The majority of patients are not treated fully, and
therefore identification of the mechanisms involved in
AML invasion may culminate in innovative therapeutic methods, improve the treatment rate and reduce the rate of
recurrence. Many studies have been conducted on AML,
but the complex molecular mechanisms of the disease
invasion and progression have not yet been adequately
identified and further studies are needed to investigate
this subject (4).Much evidence has revealed dysregulation of
microRNAs expression in cancer cells, so that miRNAs
serve as tumor suppressors or oncogenes in cancer (5).MiR-625-5p dysfunction has been identified in many
diseases, often with reduced expression of the microRNA.
This molecule can suppress various tumors, such as
hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, gastric cancer,
and acute lymphocytic lukemia (ALL) (6). The increased
expression of this miR can inhibit the proliferation and
invasion of cancer cells. It has been confirmed that miR-625-5p expression decreases in
AML cell lines (7).Upregulation of miR-625-5p in gastric cancer
significantly suppresses cell invasion and metastasis.
ILK is a target gene of miR-625-5p that regulates cell
invasion and metastasis. The integrin signaling pathway
plays a crucial role in mediating the interaction between
cells and the ECM. The ligand of ILK binds to the integrin
and initiates out-to-inside signals by modulating the
changes in various intracellular pathways including the
expression of the genes MMP9 and NF-κB contributed in
cell migration and invasion (8, 9).ILK contributes substantially to regulating anchorage
cell survival and growth, cell cycle progression, the
epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and
migration as well ascell movement. The invasion of the
ILK signaling pathway occurs through two pathways:
the GSK3β-Ap1-MMP9 signaling pathway and the
AKT- NF-κB-COX2 pathway (10).ILK activity increases in many cancers, and
therefore ILK inhibitors have been identified that
contribute to cancer treatment by inhibiting cell
invasion, proliferation and survival so far (11, 12). It
has also been demonstrated that this miR y, can control
the downstream pathways by influencing the ILK
signaling pathway and thus involved in the invasion
and metastasis of cancers (8, 13).Increased expression of miR-625-5p leads to
induction of apoptosis and reduction in migration
and invasion in AML by decreasing oncogenes.
Studies on ILK gene expression throughout miR-625-5p’s exerting effect on AML cell and changes in
the expression of proteins involved in invasion and
metastasis have increased our understanding of how
this miR and its target genes in various processes lead
to leukemia in the bone marrow.This study investigated the effect of miR-625-5p upregulation on the invasion of AML cell
in vitro. Finally, the mechanism of effect of miR-625-5p of KG1 cell line
invasion is evaluated, and mRNA and protein levels of factors involved in the invasion, are
measured through the ILK signaling pathway, including COX2, NF-ƙB, GSK3β, MMP9, AP1, and
ILK.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and cell cultures
In this experimental study, mycoplasma-negative KG1
human cells were purchased from the Pasteur Institute
(Tehran, Iran). The KG1 cell line was taken from a patient
with erythroleukemia in the myeloblastic phase and
has the phenotype and function of myeloblasts. Human
embryonic kidney 293 T cells were obtained from the
Royan Institute (Tehran, Iran).KG1 cell lines were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Gibco-BRL, Eggenstein, Germany)
containing10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and
2mm L-glutamine (Gibco, Germany) and in the presence of 5% CO2 at 37°C.HEK cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM,Gibco-BRL, Eggenstein,
Germany) with 15% FBS at 37°C and 5% CO2 . Every two days, the cell lines
medium was changed.This study was ethically coded and approved by
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.SPH.
REC.1395.837) and Royan Institute (IR.ACECR.ROYAN.
REC.1397.41).
Plasmid construct and extraction
The pLentiIII-premiR-625-5p-GFP expression vector constructs and pLentiIII-Backbone-GFP
were purchased from the Bonyakhte Institute (Tehran, Iran). Vector-harboring E. coliDH5α
strain was grown in an incubator for 24 hours to produce a single colony on an LB agar
medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) containing ampicillin at a concentration of 50
mg/ml of culture medium. One hundred μl of the culture containing bacteria purchased in
Falcon tube was cultured in 300 ml of LB Broth (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) containing
antibiotics and ampicillin, and placed inside a shaker incubator at 37°C for 12-16 hours.
The plasmid was extracted by using Gene All ExprepTM Plasmid Kit (Gene All,
Dongnam, Songpagu, Macherey-Nagel, Korea).
Confirmation of plasmid structure of pLentiIII-miR-625-5p-GFP and pLenti-backbone-GFP
To confirm the presence of miR-625-5p, we first
retrieved the sequence file for miR-625-5p and the
backbone using the Snap Gene program and the gene
bank. miR-625-5p restriction enzymes, called BamH1
and EcoR1(Bonyakhte, Iran). Solutions contain of vector
and enzymes that were first placed in a 37°C incubator
for 4-6 hours run On the 1% electrophoresis gel (Merck,
Germany). Then the plasmids were electrophoresed with
a 1 kb marker size (Gibco BRL, USA) on 1% agar gel.
After 45 minutes, plasmids were digested and identified
by a gel document (Syngen, England).
Transient transfection
The concentration of fresh KG1 cells was maintained at 0.5-1.5×106 cells/ml.
5.0×106 from the cell subcultures were transfected with 5 μg miR-625-5p and
Backbone vector using the viral transfection according to the respective protocol. First,
we added gelatin 1% into the plate and placed it in the incubator at 37°C for 1 hours.
After the removal of gelatin, the complete medium was added. 293T cells were counted and
added drop by drop on the culture medium inside the plate,the supernatant was removed
after a night and the new medium was added. At this step, we produced a transfection
solution such as DMEM low glucose media, packaging vector PD and PS (Bonyakhte, Iran),
miR-625-5p or backbone plasmid, PEI (Bonyakhte, Iran) and incubated at room temperature.
We added the transfection solution to the cells, and after 6-12 hours, removed the
supernatant and added preheated media. Twenty four hours later, the first virus was
extracted and the complete medium was added to the cells again. 48 hours later, the second
step of the virus production was performed. At this step, we centrifuged the viruses at
37565 g and 4°C for 2 hours and dissolved them in RPMI1640 media. The virus was finally
added to KG1 cell line and 48 hours after transfection, the Survival rate efficiency was
investigated by flow cytometry. Transfection was performed on two cell groups (Backbone
and Mir-625-5p) with three replications. After 48 hours of transfection, the transfected
cells were collected for further assay.
Sorting green fluorescent protein expressing cells
First, the supernatant was isolated from the cells
using centrifugation at 250 g for 5 minutes. Then, the
cells were rinsed with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered
saline (D-PBS)- solution and finally centrifuged at
250 g for 5 minutes. Then PBS with 1% bovine serum
albumin (BSA) was added, and the cells expressing
GFP were isolated using Ariya FACS sorting (Becton
Dickinson, Belgium),
Invasion assay in vitro
We applied transwell inserts (24 well inserts, 8 μm pore size Millipore, USA) to gain the
effect of miR-625-5p on the invasion of AML cells in vitro. the inserts
were coated with ECM gel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) for one night. Briefly,
2×105 cells were resuspended in serum-free medium and were dumped in the
upper chambers as duplicates. The bottom chamber was incubated via RPMI1640 containing 20%
FBS as absorbent (chemotactic) overnight to perform an invasion test.Upon completion of the experiment, the cells that have remained on the upper surface of
the membranes were removed and finally, the invasion cells to the bottom chamber were
centrifuged at 250 g for 5 minutes.Then, the supernatant was removed and were counted on
the neo-bar slide that were approximately 7×103 .The underlying cells of the insert were also fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal
violet. Randomly five visual fields were counted from
each insert using an optical microscope (14).
Flow cytometry
A total of 2-3×105 cells were rinsed with D-PBS solution and then incubated
with CXCR4-PE (Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Inc, USA). Identical iso-type antibodies were
used as a control (IgG2ακ, PE-conjugated, Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Inc, USA) for 30
minutes at 4°C.Cells were analyzed using a FACS flow cytometer
(Becton-Dickinson). Analysis of CXCR-4 expression
in GFP-positive KG1 gametes, GFP-positive KG1
cells were gated in a SSC/FL-3 dot plot.A FL-1/FL-2 dot plot was applied for further analysis
of GFP-positive KG1 cells. Mean fluorescence intensity
was measured with reference to the fluorescence
histogram and presented as corresponding units (15).
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from the KG1 cell line
using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA)
reagent 48 hours after transfection based on the
manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was then
determined by electrophoresis and DNA extraction
was performed using a fermentase kit (Fermentas,
Lithuania) to remove any remaining DNA according
to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA of the whole
RNA was synthesized by cDNA synthesis kit (Royan
Biotech, Tehran, Iran) and miR-625-5p by another
CDNA synthesis kit (Bonyakhte Tehran, Iran) (16).
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for miR-625-
5p expression
The reverse and forward primers with the stem-loop
primers were designed for cDNA synthesis and miR-625-5p qPCR according to the procedure of Chen et
al. (17).The expression level of miRNA was assessed by miRNA diagnostic kit (Bonyakhte, Iran)
using the qRT-PCR stem-loop method. U6 RNA (snord47) was used for normalization. Finally,
the relative expression ratio of miR-625-5p was determined by 2-ΔΔCTin
triplicate (13).
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for genes
expression
ILK and NF-κB as direct targets and AKT, GSK3β,
AP1 (c-FOS), MMP-9, COX2 as indirect targets of miR-625- 5p, were determined
using the miRNAs target prediction site (http//: miRtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw) and according
to the study of Wang et al. (8). Gene primers were then designed and blasted for using
Primer Premier 5 software (Premier Biosoft International, USA) and Gen Runner software
(ver.5.1). GAPDH was used a reference gene (Table 1).
Table 1
The list of primers used in quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction analysis
To detect ILK, AKT, GSK3β, AP1, MMP-9, NF-κB, COX2, and
GAPDH transcription levels, cDNA was made from the total RNA using
SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System and then measured using Takara SYBR PCR
Green Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan).The expression levels of ILK, AKT, GSK3β, AP1, MMP-9, NF-κB and
COX2 mRNA were normalized to GAPDH mRNA level. Target
genes relative expression ratio was calculated by the 2-∆∆CT method in
triplicate.To plot the standard curve of the primers, we prepared
their 1:5 to 5 titrations in distilled water and placed
them in the ABI StepOnePlus device to determine the
CT. The qRT-PCR reaction (ABI StepOnePlus) was
used to measure gene expression changes (8).
Western blotting analysis
After 48 hours, cell lines transfected with miR-625-
5p and backbone vector were cultured and rinsed three
times with cold PBS solution.Total protein was extracted from cells by trisol
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and cell lysis buffer
(Biyuntian Biotechnological Co., USA). The protein
concentration of the lysate was calculated from the
standard line of BSA.First 5 µl protein was boiled at 95°C for 5 minutes
and then cooled on ice. Then it was run on an SDS-PAGE gel (Millipore, USA) to determine its quality
and electrotransferred to PVDF membrane (Life
Science, Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany).
Membranes were blocked by non-fat dry milk (w/v)
and then immunoblotted with anti-NF-κB-p65
(Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) and anti-MMP-9 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Inc, USA) at 4°C
overnight (dilutions 1: 200 and 1: 700, respectively),
followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit
(Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) and goat (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology. Inc, USA) secondary antibodies
(dilution1:3000) incubated at room temperature for
one hour. NF-κB and MMP-9 protein bands were
visualized with ECL (Kodak Image Station; New
Haven, CT, USA). The band densities were analyzed
to use Image J software (n=3) (18).The list of primers used in quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction analysis
Statistical analysis
In this study, the GraphPad Prism software (V.7, GraphPad
Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) was employed to conduct
statistical analysis. The results of our tests were analyzed with t
test and ANOVA. The data were expressed as mean ± standard
deviation (SD). The significance level P<0.05 was considered
statistically significant. In the charts, the P<0.05 shown with
a star (*), P<0.01 shown with two stars (**), P<0.001 shown
with three stars (***), and P<0.0001 shown with four stars
(****). All the experiments were repeated three times.
Results
Transfected and overexpression of miR-625-5p in KG1 cells
To study the impact of miR-625-5p on the regulation of ILK, AKT, GSK3β,
AP1(C-FOS), MMP-9, NF-κB, COX2, and finally invasion in KG1
cells, the cells were first transfected with premiR-625-5p and backbone expression vectors
construct by viral transfection followed by detection of invasion.Fluorescent microscope (Fig .1A) and flow cytometry
analysis confirmed the efficacy of transfection after
48 hours (Fig .1B) where around 60% of the cells were
transfected. The qRT-PCR showed a significantly
increased miR-625-5p expression in the cells after 48
hours of transfection (Fig .1C). MiR-625-5p expression
was approximately 27-fold higher than that of backbone
vector-transfected cells (P=0.01).
Fig.1
GFP expression in 293T cell and KG1. A. GFP expression in 293Tcell and KG1 after 48
hours by Fluorescent microscope. 293T cells as controls for GFP expression (a, b), KG1
cells without and with GFP expression (c), KG1 cells expressing GFP positive (d).
B. Virus-free control cells with 82% viability (a) and cells with 10 μl
of concentrated virus and 7% GFP expression (b). Cells with 20μl of concentrated virus
and 34% GFP expression (c). Cells with 50 μl of concentrated virus and 43% GFP
expression (d). Cells with 70 μL of concentrated virus and 66% GFP expression (e).
Cell with 90 μl concentrated virus and 67% GFP expression (f) and cell with 120 μl
concentrated virus and 66% GFP expression (g). Based on the percentage of expression
GFP, the amount of concentrated virus was found to have a constant expression at 70,
90 and 120 μl. C. Confirmation of miR-625-5p expression in KG1 cells
after transfection by qRT-PCR. KG1 cells were transfected with pre miR-625-5p
expression vector construct or Backbone. The expression of the miR-625-5p in the KG1
cells transfected with the recombinant vector was considerably higher than Backbone
after 48 hours (**P<0.01). GFP; Green fluorescent protein and qRT-PCR;
Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction.
miR-625-5p expression reduced cell counts after
transfection
After adjoining the virus to the cells, the number o cells,
and cell viability were studied after 24 and 48 hours of the
transfection. After 48 hours, it was observed that the average
number of cells and viability percentage reduced in miR-625-
5p-transfected cells compared to the backbone group (P<0.01).
The association of miR-625-5p expression with the
invasive activity of acute myeloeid leukemia cell line
To figure out the association of miR-625-5p with cell
invasion, cellular invasion in the KG1 cells was evaluated by
transwell insert 48 hours after transfection. As illustrated in
Figure 2A and B, the count of cells attached to the filter bottom
decreased in cells treated with miR-625-5p. The number of
miR-625-5p transfected KG1 cell line was lower than that
of Backbone transfected cells. The count of these cells was
approximately 0.6% fold lower than control (Fig .2C, P<0.01).
Fig.2
Effect of miR-625-5p overexpression on invasion in kG1 cells 48 hours post-transfection. The
transfected KG1 cells were treated with invasion assay (transwell insert) and followed
by count. Invasive cells and connected to bottom the filter. A. Cells
transfected with backbone (scale bar: 100 µm). B. Cells transfected with
miR-625-5p (scale bar: 100 µm). Overexpression of miR-625-5p in KG1 cells
significantly decreased the invasive cell compared to Backbone. C. There
was a significant 0/6% reduction in the invasive cells transfected with miR-625-5p
construct (**P<0.01).
Overexpression of miR-625-5p reduced CXCR-4
expression in the surface of the KG1 cell
The CXCR-4 surface marker was examined using flow
cytometry with an antibody attached to the PE as a marker
of invasion. As illustrated in Figure 3A and B, the count of
miR-625-5p transfected KG1 cell line was lower than that
in backbone transfected cells. The count of cells transfected
with pre miR-625-5p expressing CXCR was around 13.7%
lower than Backbone vector-transfected cells (Fig .3C).
Fig.3
Effect of miR-625 overexpression on cells expressing CXCR-4 in KG1 cells 48 hours
post-transfection. The transfected KG1 cells were treated with Antibody CXCR-4-PE and
followed by flow cytometry analysis. A. In the KG1 cells transfected with
pre miR-625-5p-GFP construct, approximately 13.7% of cells became CXCR-4-PE positive.
B. About 27.5% of KG1 transfected cells with Backbone-GFP showed
CXCR-4-PE positive. C. Overexpression of miR-625-5p in KG1 cells
significantly decreased cells expressing CXCR-4compared to Backbone (**P<0.01).
GFP expression in 293T cell and KG1. A. GFP expression in 293Tcell and KG1 after 48
hours by Fluorescent microscope. 293T cells as controls for GFP expression (a, b), KG1
cells without and with GFP expression (c), KG1 cells expressing GFP positive (d).
B. Virus-free control cells with 82% viability (a) and cells with 10 μl
of concentrated virus and 7% GFP expression (b). Cells with 20μl of concentrated virus
and 34% GFP expression (c). Cells with 50 μl of concentrated virus and 43% GFP
expression (d). Cells with 70 μL of concentrated virus and 66% GFP expression (e).
Cell with 90 μl concentrated virus and 67% GFP expression (f) and cell with 120 μl
concentrated virus and 66% GFP expression (g). Based on the percentage of expression
GFP, the amount of concentrated virus was found to have a constant expression at 70,
90 and 120 μl. C. Confirmation of miR-625-5p expression in KG1 cells
after transfection by qRT-PCR. KG1 cells were transfected with pre miR-625-5p
expression vector construct or Backbone. The expression of the miR-625-5p in the KG1
cells transfected with the recombinant vector was considerably higher than Backbone
after 48 hours (**P<0.01). GFP; Green fluorescent protein and qRT-PCR;
Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction.Effect of miR-625-5p overexpression on invasion in kG1 cells 48 hours post-transfection. The
transfected KG1 cells were treated with invasion assay (transwell insert) and followed
by count. Invasive cells and connected to bottom the filter. A. Cells
transfected with backbone (scale bar: 100 µm). B. Cells transfected with
miR-625-5p (scale bar: 100 µm). Overexpression of miR-625-5p in KG1 cells
significantly decreased the invasive cell compared to Backbone. C. There
was a significant 0/6% reduction in the invasive cells transfected with miR-625-5p
construct (**P<0.01).Effect of miR-625 overexpression on cells expressing CXCR-4 in KG1 cells 48 hours
post-transfection. The transfected KG1 cells were treated with Antibody CXCR-4-PE and
followed by flow cytometry analysis. A. In the KG1 cells transfected with
pre miR-625-5p-GFP construct, approximately 13.7% of cells became CXCR-4-PE positive.
B. About 27.5% of KG1 transfected cells with Backbone-GFP showed
CXCR-4-PE positive. C. Overexpression of miR-625-5p in KG1 cells
significantly decreased cells expressing CXCR-4compared to Backbone (**P<0.01).
ILK and NF-κB are potential downstream targets of
miR-625-5p
To figure out the miR-625-5p-mediated invasion molecular mechanism in KG1 cells, we
identified the targets of miR-625-5p. The sequence analysis of ILK demonstrated that ILK
harbored potential miR-625-5p target sites at 136-143nt, which are the ILK 3′UTR, and the
sequence analysis of NF-κB indicated that NF-κB harbored potential miR-625-5p target site
3′UTR of the microRNA.org site. Regarding the correlation of miR-625- 5p to ILK, the ILK
and downstream oncogenes mRNA levels were measured in the KG1 cell line. Cell mRNA was
used 48 hours after transfection to evaluate changes in the expression of ILK,
AKT, GSK3β, C-FOS (AP1), MMP-9, NF-κB genes using qRT-PCR (Fig .4). Our results
from qRT-PCR demonstrated that the expression of ILK, as the main target at the mRNA
level, was dramatically reduced in KG1 compared with the Backbone-transfected KG1 cell
line. The expression of ILK in these cells caused a significant decrease
(0.53 times lower than Backbone group) (P<0.01). The expression of the
NF-κB and COX2 genes decreased [0.55 (P<0.01),
0.32 (P<0.001), respectively] and the expression of genes MMP-9, C-FOS
(AP1) and AKT increased [1.36 (P<0.01), 3
(P<0/001) and 1.43 (P<0.01), respectively]; however GSK3β
did not show a significant change (0.85 with P>0.05).
Fig.4
Expression of ILK, AKT, GSK3β, AP1, MMP-9, NF-κB genes by qPCR. KG1 cells
transfected either with the premiR-625-5p construct or Backbone vector followed by
expression evaluation ILK, AKT, GSK3β, AP1, MMP-9, NF-κB genes 48
hours after transfection. Overexpressed miR-625- 5p resulted in downregulation of
ILK, NF-κB and COX2 expression and upregulation of
AKT, MMP-9 and C-FOS (AP1) but caused no
alteration in GSK3β expression (P<0.01, P<0.001). In
the diagrams, P<0.01 and P<0.001 are shown with ** and ***,
respectively. qPCR; Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction and ns; Not
significant.
Expression of ILK, AKT, GSK3β, AP1, MMP-9, NF-κB genes by qPCR. KG1 cells
transfected either with the premiR-625-5p construct or Backbone vector followed by
expression evaluation ILK, AKT, GSK3β, AP1, MMP-9, NF-κB genes 48
hours after transfection. Overexpressed miR-625- 5p resulted in downregulation of
ILK, NF-κB and COX2 expression and upregulation of
AKT, MMP-9 and C-FOS (AP1) but caused no
alteration in GSK3β expression (P<0.01, P<0.001). In
the diagrams, P<0.01 and P<0.001 are shown with ** and ***,
respectively. qPCR; Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction and ns; Not
significant.
Overexpression MiR-625-5p reduction of NF-κB
expression of protein
The western blotting was performed to evaluate the
expression of NF-κB, MMP-9 and β-Actin proteins in
invasion KG1 cells compared with the Backbone cells 48
hours after transfection. As illustrated in Figure 5A, the
NF-kB protein showed a significant reduction of 0.6% fold
(P<0.01) when it transfected with miR-625-5p versus the
backbone group and MMP9 protein expression that did not
show a significant change (Fig .5B). The results showed that
miR-625-5p could inhibit cell invasion by inhibiting ILK and
NF-κB as well as the COX-2 signaling pathway.
Fig.5
Western blot and Densitometry analysis of NF-κB and MMP-9 protein expression in KG1 cells
transfected by either premiR625-5p construct or Backbone vector 48 hours
post-transfection. A. miR-625-5p downregulated (0.6 fold lower) NF-κB
protein. B. miR-625-5p caused no alteration in MMP-9 expression.
Densitometry analysis of bands by ImageJ software. β-actin was used as loading control
(P<0.01). In the diagrams, P<0.01 is shown with (**).
Western blot and Densitometry analysis of NF-κB and MMP-9 protein expression in KG1 cells
transfected by either premiR625-5p construct or Backbone vector 48 hours
post-transfection. A. miR-625-5p downregulated (0.6 fold lower) NF-κB
protein. B. miR-625-5p caused no alteration in MMP-9 expression.
Densitometry analysis of bands by ImageJ software. β-actin was used as loading control
(P<0.01). In the diagrams, P<0.01 is shown with (**).
Discussion
The unnatural expression of miRNAs has already
been investigated in different cancers, focusing on the
understanding of the role and function of miRNAs in
cancer progression (19). Here, we assessed miR-625-5p-mediated invasion molecular mechanism in AML cells
(20). MiR-625-5p-transfected KG1 cells of invasion
significantly decreased. The expression levels of ILK, NF-κB, and COX2 genes significantly decreased while MMP9,
AP1, and AKT significantly increased, whereas GSK3β
did not change significantly. At the protein level, NF-κB,
decreased and MMP9 increased but not significantly. The
expression of CXCR4 was also significantly lower.Our results also showed that miR-625-5p inhibited
cell invasion and migration in AML cells. Surprisingly,
we found ILK as a possible target for miR-625-5p. We
observed that miR-625-5p exhibited its tumor-suppressing
function in the downregulation of cell invasion by
regulating the ILK-NF-ƙB-COX2 pathways. Our study
may therefore offer a new strategy for AML treatment
through the upregulation miR-625-5p level.AML is a heterozygous disease in which cell proliferation
is high and apoptosis is low, and therefore its treatment is
challenging due to the unknown pathogenic and intrinsic
biological agents (21). The identification of AML invasion
mechanisms may culminate in innovative therapeutic
methods, an increase in treatment rate, and a decrease in
the recurrence rate (4). Various types of miR-RNAs play
part in AML and other cancers. For example, miR-625-
5p is a potential biomolecule playing part in regulating
cell survival and differentiation. Studies have shown miR-625-5p expression is often reduced and acts as a tumor
suppressor in various tumors, including hepatocellular
carcinoma, breast cancer, and malignant melanoma (22).
It has also been demonstrated that miR-625-5p expression
decreases in AML cell lines (23).The expression of this miR can inhibit the proliferation
and invasion of cancer cells (7). In the study Ma et al.
(14), increased expression of mir-625-5p led to decreased
apoptosis and cellular metastasis in patients with AML. In another study, Wang et al.
(8) showed that miR- 625-5p upregulation in gastric cancer
resulted in a decrease in invasion through interfering with the regulation of the ILK signaling pathway.
Our findings revealed that invasion was significantly decreased in KG1 cells following overexpression
of miR-625-5p. In the current study, we addressed the potential anticancer effect
of miR-625-5p to assist in the treatment of AML
(11).According to a previous study, the expression of ILK
has constitutive activation in AML (12). Inhibition of ILK
by compound-22 causes inhibition of migration, invasion,
and proliferation in CML, AML, and ALL (24). ILK is a
direct target of miR-625-5p, and miR-625-5p upregulation
in KG1 cells results in ILK expression downregulation
(8) followed by downregulation of AKT of NF-κB and
COX2, resulting in invasion (25, 26). AKT1 activates
the proliferation and invasion pathways in breast tumors, colorectal cancer, and leukemia (27). AKT1 seems to
play an essential yet passive part in oncogenesis. AKT
is activated directly via PIP3 and ILK (10). In reality,
the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway contributes greatly
to regulating cellular processes by which cancer is
characterized, such as cell proliferation, survival, and
migration (28). AKT can activate NF-κB and therefore
NF-κB is an important marker in cancer cells involved in
growth-independent propagation, apoptosis prevention,
infiltrate replication, invasion, and tissue metastasis. ILK
also leads to the activation of COX2 via the ILK-AKT-NF-κB pathway (25, 29). Previous studies have shown
that the expression of COX2 increases in AML (30). Our
results also showed that overexpression of miR-625-
5p resulted in the downregulation of ILK, NF-κB, and
COX2 because of miR-625-5p, according to microRNA.
org, directly inhibited ILK and NF-κB and subsequently
invasion. Overexpression of miR-625-5p led to the
upregulation of AKT because AKT was separately
activated via PIP3.Ample evidence demonstrates that ILK activates
the GSK3β-AP1-MMP9 signaling pathway. GSK3β
contributes substantially to the cytoskeletal organization,
cell polarity, and migration in organogenesis and
wound healing physiological processes (2). GSK3β
also contributes to cancer cell motility, migration, and
invasion via a pharmacological inhibitor and, through the
interference of RNA, reduces the capacity of migration
and invasion of pancreatic cancer glioblastoma cells,
resulting in the decrease of MMP-2 expression (31). AKT
positively regulates these targets through the inhibition of
GSK3 as well (32). Then, the increase in the expression of
c-fos (AP1), in addition to AP1-related target genes, has
been observed in many cancers. The expression of ILK
induces expression of MMP-9 through the activation of
AP1 transcription, causing the increase of migration and
invasion. MMPs are indeed a family of endopeptidases
that are functionally and structurally zinc-dependent and
are responsible for the destruction of ECM components,
and thus regulate metastasis and invasive tumor cells. The
expression of MMPs is controlled by upstream regulation
of sequences and has a connection point for AP1. MMP-9 expression increases in malignant cancers (33). In our
study the miR-625-5p expression did not change the
expression level of MMP-9.Lou et al. (34) investigated osteosarcoma (OS) and its miR-625 related effects. miR-625
expression enhanced by mimic-miR-625 substantially decreased the invasion and proliferation
of OS cells through the YAP-1 gene, an important target for the treatment
of OS. Wang et al. (8) studied the expression of miR-625, which contributes importantly to
cancer progression. By inducing and increasing the expression of this miR in gastric cancer
cells, they found that metastasis and tumor invasion were inhibited by the ILK signaling
pathway and ILK was miR-625-5p’s direct target.Generally, in agreement with the results of Wang et al.
(8) and Lou et al. (34). the current study indicated that miR-625’s inhibitory effect on invasion was similar to
its oncogenic effects (35). In our study, similar to the
findings of previous studies the overexpression of miR-625-5p altered the expression level of ILK, NF-κB, and
COX2. The results of our study regarding ILK expression
and invasion are consistent with the this study.CXCR-4 is a chemokine receptor coupled to G proteins,
which are expressed on the HSCs. Indeed, CXCL-12 is
coupled to the CXCR-4 receptor on the surface of HSCs,
which is a chemokine playing a highly important role in
maintaining bone marrow, silence, implantation, survival,
leading to the maintenance of the function of HSCs and
gene expression, and cell migration by downstream B
kinase (AKT)/(MAPK) signaling pathway activity (35).
In AML patients, CXCR4 expression is significantly up-regulated and has a poor prognosis. In leukemia, CXCR4
causes the adhesion of leukemia cells to bone marrow
stromal cells, resulting in resistance to chemotherapy
and extramedullary infiltration into organs expressing
SDF-1 (36). Metastasis of cancer cells occurs through the
activation of CXCR-4 and the migration of cancer cells
towards the organs expressing CXCL-12. Also, SDF-1a
regulates leukemia cell trafficking through binding its
cognate receptor CXCR4 on leukemia cells. In the BM,
disturbance and destruction of cell anchorage by SDF1-
CXCR-4 via proteolytic enzymes such as MMP-9 can lead
to cellular development in the bloodstream. The CXCR-4-CXCL-12 axis is powered by AML and is a regulator of
cell invasion, mobilization, implantation, and maintenance
of leukemia stem cells during the onset and progression of
the disease (37, 38). Panneerselvam et al. (39) reported
that IL-24 disrupted the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis
and reduced CXCR4 expression and finally inhibited the
invasion and migration of lung cancer cells. The study
of Zuo et al. (40) indicated that CXCR4 overexpression
enhanced cell motility and invasion by producing EGFR
and MMP-9 in lung cancer (NSCLC). The results of our
study regarding the expression of CXCR-4 are consistent
with the studies of Panneerselvam et al. (39) and Zuo
et al. (40) in which miR-625-5p overexpression caused
CXCR-4 expression reduction.
Conclusion
The upregulation of the miR-625-5p expression leads to
a reduction in cellular invasion in AML cell lines via the
ILK pathway signaling via AKT-NF-κB-COX2 pathway.
Based on the findings, that show that miR-625-5p leads
to a reduction in cell invasion in the AML cell line by
ILK pathway, this strategy could be a breakthrough in
future AML-related research. However, further studies
are needed to achieve this goal.
Authors: Richard M Stone; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ben L Sanford; Kristina Laumann; Susan Geyer; Clara D Bloomfield; Christian Thiede; Thomas W Prior; Konstanze Döhner; Guido Marcucci; Francesco Lo-Coco; Rebecca B Klisovic; Andrew Wei; Jorge Sierra; Miguel A Sanz; Joseph M Brandwein; Theo de Witte; Dietger Niederwieser; Frederick R Appelbaum; Bruno C Medeiros; Martin S Tallman; Jürgen Krauter; Richard F Schlenk; Arnold Ganser; Hubert Serve; Gerhard Ehninger; Sergio Amadori; Richard A Larson; Hartmut Döhner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Caifu Chen; Dana A Ridzon; Adam J Broomer; Zhaohui Zhou; Danny H Lee; Julie T Nguyen; Maura Barbisin; Nan Lan Xu; Vikram R Mahuvakar; Mark R Andersen; Kai Qin Lao; Kenneth J Livak; Karl J Guegler Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2005-11-27 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Mohammad Ali Khosravi; Maryam Abbasalipour; Jean-Paul Concordet; Johannes Vom Berg; Sirous Zeinali; Arash Arashkia; Thorsten Buch; Morteza Karimipoor Journal: Data Brief Date: 2019-12-11