Literature DB >> 35279787

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Porto-systemic Pressure Gradient Measurement Correlates with Histological Hepatic Fibrosis.

Alyssa Y Choi1, Kenneth J Chang1, Jason B Samarasena1, John G Lee1, Xiaodong Li2, Wenchang Guo2, Vishal S Chandan2, Ke-Qin Hu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound is a novel diagnostic approach to chronic liver diseases (CLDs), and EUS-guided porto-systemic pressure gradient measurement (EUS-PPG) is an important expansion with a well-developed technique. However, the clinical value and applicability of EUS-PPG measurement in predicting histologically advanced hepatic fibrosis remain unknown.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study on patients with various CLDs undergoing EUS-PPG and EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-bx) to assess if EUS-PPG measurements correlate with histological fibrosis stage and various surrogate markers for severity of CLDs and its safety. Cases with EUS-PPG were identified at the University of California Irvine, a tertiary endoscopy center, between January 2014 and March 2020.
RESULTS: In 64 patients, the mean age was 57.5; 40 (62.5%), males; mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, 5.9 and 10.4, respectively. The procedure success rate was 100%. Twenty-nine (45.3%) had EUS-PPG ≥ 5 mmHg that was associated with clinical cirrhosis (p < 0.0001), clinical portal hypertension (p = 0.002), hepatic decompensation (p = 0.013), MELD-Na > 10 (p = 0.036), PLTs ≤ 120 × 109/L (p = 0.001), INR ≥ 1.05 (p = 0.007), presence of EV, GV, or PHG (p < 0.0001), biopsy-proven fibrosis stage ≥ 3 (p = 0.002), APRI > 2 (p = 0.001), and FIB-4 > 3.25 (p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that EUS-PPG ≥ 5 mmHg was significantly associated with liver biopsy-proven fibrosis stage ≥ 3 (LR 27.0, 95% CI = 1.653-360.597, p = 0.004), independent of C-cirrhosis, C-PHTN, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, and APRI score > 2, and FIB-4 score > 3.25. There were no serious complications related to EUS-PPG procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-PPG measurements provide excellent correlation with histological hepatic fibrosis stage and various clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and imaging variables indicative of advanced liver disease without serious adverse events.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endohepatology; Endoscopic ultrasound; Hepatic fibrosis; Portal hypertension; Porto-systemic pressure gradient

Year:  2022        PMID: 35279787     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07418-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  19 in total

1.  Estimation of portal venous pressure by occlusive hepatic vein catheterization.

Authors:  H KROOK
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1953       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension.

Authors:  Roberto de Franchis
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases.

Authors:  Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Juan G Abraldes; Annalisa Berzigotti; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 4.  Pathophysiology of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Yasuko Iwakiri
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.126

5.  EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study.

Authors:  Jason Y Huang; Jason B Samarasena; Takeshi Tsujino; John Lee; Ke-Qin Hu; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient identifies patients at risk of severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Alejandro Blasco; Xavier Forns; José A Carrión; Juan Carlos García-Pagán; Rosa Gilabert; Antoni Rimola; Rosa Miquel; Miquel Bruguera; Juan-Carlos García-Valdecasas; Jaime Bosch; Miquel Navasa
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a novel 25-gauge needle device versus standard transjugular approach: a comparison animal study.

Authors:  Jason Y Huang; Jason B Samarasena; Takeshi Tsujino; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient: clinical use in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Ki Tae Suk
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2014-03-26

9.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Portal Pressure Measurement and Interventions.

Authors:  Jason B Samarasena; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-05-31

10.  EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study.

Authors:  Jason B Samarasena; Jason Y Huang; Takeshi Tsujino; Daniel Thieu; Allen Yu; Ke-Qin Hu; John Lee; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2018-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.