BACKGROUND AIMS: The final harvest or wash of a cell therapy product is an important step in manufacturing, as viable cell recovery is critical to the overall success of a cell therapy. Most harvest/wash approaches in the clinical lab involve centrifugation, which can lead to loss of cells and decreased viability of the final product. Here the authors report on a multi-center assessment of the LOVO Cell Processing System (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany), a cell processing device that uses a spinning filtration membrane instead of centrifugation. METHODS: Four National Institutes of Health Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies cell processing facilities (CPFs) assessed the LOVO Cell Processing System for final harvest and/or wash of the following three different cell products: activated T cells (ATCs), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Each site compared their current in-house, routinely used method of final cell harvest and/or wash with that of the LOVO device. RESULTS: Final harvest and/or wash of ATCs, TILs and MSCs using the LOVO system resulted in satisfactory cell viability and recovery with some substantial improvement over the in-house methods of CPFs. Processing time was variable among cell types/facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The LOVO Cell Processing System provides an alternative to centrifuge-based technologies. The system employs a spinning membrane filter, exposing cells to minimal g-forces compared with centrifugation, and is automated and closed. This small multi-center study demonstrated the ability of the LOVO device to yield satisfactory cell viability and recovery of T cells and MSCs.
BACKGROUND AIMS: The final harvest or wash of a cell therapy product is an important step in manufacturing, as viable cell recovery is critical to the overall success of a cell therapy. Most harvest/wash approaches in the clinical lab involve centrifugation, which can lead to loss of cells and decreased viability of the final product. Here the authors report on a multi-center assessment of the LOVO Cell Processing System (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany), a cell processing device that uses a spinning filtration membrane instead of centrifugation. METHODS: Four National Institutes of Health Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies cell processing facilities (CPFs) assessed the LOVO Cell Processing System for final harvest and/or wash of the following three different cell products: activated T cells (ATCs), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Each site compared their current in-house, routinely used method of final cell harvest and/or wash with that of the LOVO device. RESULTS: Final harvest and/or wash of ATCs, TILs and MSCs using the LOVO system resulted in satisfactory cell viability and recovery with some substantial improvement over the in-house methods of CPFs. Processing time was variable among cell types/facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The LOVO Cell Processing System provides an alternative to centrifuge-based technologies. The system employs a spinning membrane filter, exposing cells to minimal g-forces compared with centrifugation, and is automated and closed. This small multi-center study demonstrated the ability of the LOVO device to yield satisfactory cell viability and recovery of T cells and MSCs.
Authors: Cesare G Perotti; Claudia Del Fante; Gianluca Viarengo; Pietro Papa; Loretta Rocchi; Paola Bergamaschi; Laura Bellotti; Andrea Marchesi; Laura Salvaneschi Journal: Transfusion Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Anqi Li; Gina D Kusuma; Dawn Driscoll; Nathan Smith; Dominic M Wall; Bruce L Levine; David James; Rebecca Lim Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 5.414
Authors: David H McKenna; Darin Sumstad; Diane M Kadidlo; Bjorn Batdorf; Colin J Lord; Sarah C Merkel; Christine M Koellner; Julie M Curtsinger; Carl H June; James L Riley; Bruce L Levine; Jeffrey S Miller; Claudio G Brunstein; John E Wagner; Bruce R Blazar; Keli L Hippen Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.414