| Literature DB >> 35278132 |
Chaogang Ban1, Youyu Duan1, Yang Wang1, Jiangping Ma1, Kaiwen Wang2, Jiazhi Meng1, Xue Liu1, Cong Wang2, Xiaodong Han2, Guozhong Cao3, Liyong Gan4,5, Xiaoyuan Zhou6,7,8.
Abstract
Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to high-value products plays a crucial role in the global pursuit of carbon-neutral economy. Junction photocatalysts, such as the isotype heterojunctions, offer an ideal paradigm to navigate the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CRR). Herein, we elucidate the behaviors of isotype heterojunctions toward photocatalytic CRR over a representative photocatalyst, g-C3N4. Impressively, the isotype heterojunctions possess a significantly higher efficiency for the spatial separation and transfer of photogenerated carriers than the single components. Along with the intrinsically outstanding stability, the isotype heterojunctions exhibit an exceptional and stable activity toward the CO2 photoreduction to CO. More importantly, by combining quantitative in situ technique with the first-principles modeling, we elucidate that the enhanced photoinduced charge dynamics promotes the production of key intermediates and thus the whole reaction kinetics.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 photoreduction; Charge dynamics; Isotype heterojunction; Reaction mechanism; g-C3N4
Year: 2022 PMID: 35278132 PMCID: PMC8918288 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00821-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1a XRD patterns, b FTIR spectra, c XPS for C 1s and d N 1s spectra of ICN-3, TCN and MCN
Fig. 2a Schematic diagram of ICN. TEM images of b MCN, c TCN and d ICN-3. e SEM images of ICN-3
Fig. 3a UV-DRS spectra. b Corresponding Tauc plots of as-obtained photocatalysts. c The Mott–Schottky plots of TCN and MCN. d Schematic of electrons–holes separation and transfer at the interface between TCN and MCN
Fig. 4a Steady-state photoluminescence spectroscopy, b time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy, c transient photocurrent response, and d electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of photocatalysts
The photogenerated charge lifetime (τ1, τ2, τ3 and τave), transfer rate (kCT), transfer efficiency (η), photogenerated charge transfer resistance (RCT) and photocurrent current density (I) of samples
| Samples | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCN | 1.13 | 4.16 | 19.75 | 8.91 | – | – | 3.33 × 105 | 17.61 |
| TCN | 1.09 | 4.08 | 18.74 | 9.06 | – | – | 2.56 × 105 | 16.52 |
| ICN-3 | 1.03 | 3.76 | 17.25 | 7.79 | 1.80 × 107 | 13% | 3.94 × 104 | 31.23 |
Fig. 5a, b CO production rates from photocatalytic CRR under irradiation. c Photocatalytic stability test of ICN-3 for 240 min in each cycle
Fig. 6In situ DRIFTS analysis of photocatalytic CRR over a ICN-3, b TCN and c MCN. Normalized absorbance of d COO* and e COOH* on ICN-3, TCN and MCN
Fig. 7a Free energy profiles of photocatalytic CRR to CO. Difference charge density diagrams of CO2 adsorption on the b pristine and c modified g-C3N4. The isosurface value is 5 × 104 e Å−3