Literature DB >> 35278075

Tomatoes, Lycopene, and Prostate Cancer: What Have We Learned from Experimental Models?

Nancy E Moran1,2, Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner2, Lei Wan2,3, Krystle E Zuniga4,5, John W Erdman4, Steven K Clinton2,6.   

Abstract

Human epidemiology suggests a protective effect of tomatoes or tomato phytochemicals, such as lycopene, on prostate cancer risk. However, human epidemiology alone cannot reveal causal relations. Laboratory animal models of prostate cancer provide opportunities to investigate hypotheses regarding dietary components in precisely controlled, experimental systems, contributing to our understanding of diet and cancer risk relations. We review the published studies evaluating the impact of tomatoes and/or lycopene in preclinical models of prostate carcinogenesis and tumorigenesis. The feeding of tomatoes or tomato components demonstrates anti-prostate cancer activity in both transplantable xenograft models of tumorigenesis and models of chemically- and genetically-driven carcinogenesis. Feeding pure lycopene shows anticancer activity in most studies, although outcomes vary by model system, suggesting that the impact of pure lycopene can depend on dose, duration, and specific carcinogenic processes represented in different models. Nonetheless, studies with the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model of carcinogenesis typically demonstrate similar bioactivity to that of tomato feeding. In general, interventions that commence earlier in carcinogenesis and are sustained tend to be more efficacious. Accumulated data suggest that lycopene is one, but perhaps not the only, anticancer bioactive compound in tomatoes. Although it is clear that tomatoes and lycopene have anti-prostate cancer activity in rodent models, major knowledge gaps remain in understanding dose-response relations and molecular mechanisms of action. Published and future findings from rodent studies can provide guidance for translational scientists to design and execute informative human clinical trials of prostate cancer prevention or in support of therapy.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nutrition; preclinical models; prostate carcinogenesis; prostate metastasis; tomato

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35278075      PMCID: PMC9178968          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxac066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.687


  127 in total

1.  Invited commentary: tomatoes, lycopene, and prostate cancer. How strong is the evidence?

Authors:  A R Kristal; J H Cohen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  The use of genetically engineered mouse models of prostate cancer for nutrition and cancer chemoprevention research.

Authors:  Russell D Klein
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Dietary Tomato or Lycopene Do Not Reduce Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progression in a Murine Model.

Authors:  Joe L Rowles; Joshua W Smith; Catherine C Applegate; Rita J Miller; Matthew A Wallig; Amandeep Kaur; Jesus N Sarol; Salma Musaad; Steven K Clinton; William D O'Brien; John W Erdman
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Modeling prostate cancer in mice: limitations and opportunities.

Authors:  Patrick J Hensley; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2011-06-16

5.  Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study.

Authors:  J M Chan; M J Stampfer; E Giovannucci; P H Gann; J Ma; P Wilkinson; C H Hennekens; M Pollak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Tomato-based food products for prostate cancer prevention: what have we learned?

Authors:  Hsueh-Li Tan; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Elizabeth M Grainger; Lei Wan; David M Francis; Steven J Schwartz; John W Erdman; Steven K Clinton
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  A combination of micronutrients is beneficial in reducing the incidence of prostate cancer and increasing survival in the Lady transgenic model.

Authors:  Vasundara Venkateswaran; Laurence H Klotz; Meera Ramani; Linda M Sugar; Latha E Jacob; Robert K Nam; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-04-28

Review 8.  Animal models for the study of prostate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M C Bosland
Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl       Date:  1992

9.  Lycopene metabolite, apo-10'-lycopenoic acid, inhibits diethylnitrosamine-initiated, high fat diet-promoted hepatic inflammation and tumorigenesis in mice.

Authors:  Blanche C Ip; Kang-Quan Hu; Chun Liu; Donald E Smith; Martin S Obin; Lynne M Ausman; Xiang-Dong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-10-01

10.  Dietary chemoprevention of PhIP induced carcinogenesis in male Fischer 344 rats with tomato and broccoli.

Authors:  Kirstie Canene-Adams; Karen S Sfanos; Chung-Tiang Liang; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; William G Nelson; Cory Brayton; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Anti-prostate cancer protection and therapy in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine - comprehensive effects of phytochemicals in primary, secondary and tertiary care.

Authors:  Alena Mazurakova; Marek Samec; Lenka Koklesova; Kamil Biringer; Erik Kudela; Raghad Khalid Al-Ishaq; Martin Pec; Frank A Giordano; Dietrich Büsselberg; Peter Kubatka; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 8.836

2.  Extracts of Common Vegetables Inhibit the Growth of Ovary Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Paulina Furdak; Natalia Pieńkowska; Grzegorz Bartosz; Izabela Sadowska-Bartosz
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.