Kyong Hwa Park1, Jong Hoon Park2, Ah Reum Lim3, Jwa Hoon Kim3, Myung Han Hyun3, Won-Jin Chang3, Soohyeon Lee3, Yeul Hong Kim3. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. khpark@korea.ac.kr. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. pjh1964@hanmail.net. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Perioperative blood transfusion in early stage cancer patients had a negative effect on the prognosis of patients, but the prognostic impact of transfusion in advanced cancer patients remains unclear. To minimize and guide rational transfusion, an institutional patient blood management (PBM) program was launched, and we evaluated the new program that has changed the practice and impacted on the prognosis of advanced cancer patients. METHODS: We investigated the medical records of colorectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy from 2015 to 2020. The amount and frequency of transfusion, iron replacement and laboratory findings, and overall survival were compared before and after implementation of PBM. RESULTS: The rate of transfusion in colorectal cancer patients was significantly decreased from 23.5/100 person-quarter in 2015 to 1.2/100 person-quarter in 2020, but iron supplementation therapy was frequently used, and the proportion of patients who received transfusion under hemoglobin 7 g/dL significantly increased from 15.9% in 2015 to 55.3% in 2020. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion was a significant risk factor affecting the overall survival of patients (HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.93-3.78, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that overall survival was significantly longer in non-transfused patients than in transfused patients (11.0 versus 22.4 months; HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.86, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that minimized transfusion through an institutional PBM can positively affect the prognosis of patients who are receiving chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: Perioperative blood transfusion in early stage cancer patients had a negative effect on the prognosis of patients, but the prognostic impact of transfusion in advanced cancer patients remains unclear. To minimize and guide rational transfusion, an institutional patient blood management (PBM) program was launched, and we evaluated the new program that has changed the practice and impacted on the prognosis of advanced cancer patients. METHODS: We investigated the medical records of colorectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy from 2015 to 2020. The amount and frequency of transfusion, iron replacement and laboratory findings, and overall survival were compared before and after implementation of PBM. RESULTS: The rate of transfusion in colorectal cancer patients was significantly decreased from 23.5/100 person-quarter in 2015 to 1.2/100 person-quarter in 2020, but iron supplementation therapy was frequently used, and the proportion of patients who received transfusion under hemoglobin 7 g/dL significantly increased from 15.9% in 2015 to 55.3% in 2020. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion was a significant risk factor affecting the overall survival of patients (HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.93-3.78, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that overall survival was significantly longer in non-transfused patients than in transfused patients (11.0 versus 22.4 months; HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.86, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that minimized transfusion through an institutional PBM can positively affect the prognosis of patients who are receiving chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Authors: Gunnar Birgegård; Matti S Aapro; Carsten Bokemeyer; Mario Dicato; Peter Drings; Javier Hornedo; Maciej Krzakowski; Heinz Ludwig; Sergio Pecorelli; Hans Schmoll; Maurice Schneider; Dirk Schrijvers; Daniel Shasha; Simon Van Belle Journal: Oncology Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Thomas Ng; Beth A Ryder; Hueylan Chern; Frank W Sellke; Jason T Machan; David T Harrington; William G Cioffi Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Heinz Ludwig; Simon Van Belle; Peter Barrett-Lee; Gunnar Birgegård; Carsten Bokemeyer; Pere Gascón; Paris Kosmidis; Maciej Krzakowski; Johan Nortier; Patrizia Olmi; Maurice Schneider; Dirk Schrijvers Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.162