Literature DB >> 35277753

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of pour-on administered eprinomectin in nematode-infected lactating female and male castrated dairy breed goats.

Xiuqing Gao1, Valerie Kvaternick2, Steffen Rehbein3, Dietmar Hamel3.   

Abstract

Eprinomectin (EPM), a macrocyclic lactone with low excretion in milk and high efficacy against endoparasites and ectoparasites, is widely used in veterinary medicine. In this paper, EPM pharmacokinetics and anthelmintic efficacy previously established in one study with lactating female goats and three studies with male castrated growing dairy breed goats (all with induced mixed adult gastrointestinal nematode parasitism and treated with a single 1-mg/kg pour-on administration of EPM) were retrospectively evaluated using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. The PK-PD analyses between EPM exposure (Cmax and AUClast) and anthelmintic response (percent efficacy) were performed for lactating female goats only and pooled lactating female and male castrated goats. The Cmax and AUClast showed no significant difference between lactating female goats and combined male castrated goats. PK-PD modeling demonstrated Trichostrongylus colubriformis, a small-intestine nematode, as a suitable indicator of the EPM nematocidal efficacy. The EC90 values obtained by modeling Cmax vs T. colubriformis were 3.50 and 2.43 ng/mL for lactating female goats only and pooled lactating female and male castrated goats, respectively. The values of AUClast needed for 90% efficacy of T. colubriformis were 25.4 and 21.1 day*ng/mL for lactating female goats only and pooled lactating female and male castrated goats, respectively. Overall, the predicted pharmacological response against T. colubriformis is similar for lactating goats only and pooled lactating female and male castrated goats and correlates with observed efficacy. In conclusion, a dosage of 1-mg/kg EPM as a pour-on is sufficient to ensure efficacy against common nematodes in both lactating female and male castrated goats.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eprinomectin; Goat; Lactating; Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35277753      PMCID: PMC8993713          DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07483-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.383


Introduction

Eprinomectin (EPM) is a macrocyclic lactone characterized by a broad spectrum of endoparasiticidal and ectoparasiticidal activity and low milk partitioning (Shoop et al. 1996a). These favorable properties allow for its use as an antiparasitic treatment in veterinary medicine, especially as a topical EPM 5-mg/mL product for pour-on administration to cattle, sheep, and goats with 0-h milk withdrawal (Shoop et al. 1996b; Shoop and Soll 2002; Hamel et al. 2017, 2021). It is accepted that goats need EPM administered as a pour-on at a higher dosage compared to cattle (1-mg/kg bodyweight vs 0.5-mg/kg bodyweight, respectively) (Chartier and Pors 2004; Cringoli et al. 2004; Hamel et al. 2015, 2021; Rehbein et al. 2014). The dosage for goats is, nevertheless, a matter of debate, mainly focusing on female dairy goats as lactation is considered a physiological covariate which may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK), and thus, the pharmacological response or anthelmintic efficacy of EPM (Dupuy et al. 2001; Lespine et al. 2012; Rostang et al. 2020). Apart from an earlier PK (only) study in lactating female dairy goats (Dupuy et al. 2001), only one publication presents PK and efficacy data established in the same study in lactating female dairy goats that confirms the efficacy of a single pour-on EPM treatment at 1 mg/kg against induced infections with a range of important gastrointestinal and respiratory nematodes of goats (Hamel et al. 2021). To further corroborate the marketed dosage in goats of pour-on EPM (1-mg/kg bodyweight), results of a series of four combined efficacy and PK studies in lactating female and male castrated growing dairy breed goats (Rehbein et al. 2014; Hamel et al. 2015, 2021) were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the PK-PD relationship of the pour-on EPM treatment, as an in-depth understanding of the anthelmintic properties of formulated products is a prerequisite for their effective use (Vercruysse et al. 2018).

Methods

For this investigation, PK-PD relevant data were extracted from four previously published studies which included induced mixed adult gastrointestinal strongylid nematode (Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Trichostrongylus axei, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Cooperia curticei, Nematodirus battus, Nematodirus spathiger, and/or Oesophagostomum venulosum) infected lactating female (Hamel et al. 2021 — Study 1) or male castrated growing dairy breed goats (Rehbein et al. 2014 — Study 2; Hamel et al. 2015 — Studies 3 and 4). These controlled anthelmintic efficacy studies followed VICH guidelines (Vercruysse et al. 2001), had an essentially identical study design, and supported the registration in goats in Europe of the 5-mg/mL EPM topical product (EPRINEX® Multi, Boehringer Ingelheim) administered as a pour-on at 1-mg/kg bodyweight. In short, animals in each study were allocated into two groups (control [untreated] or EPM-treated) of equal size (n = 10 for Study 1; n = 8 each for Studies 2, 3, and 4) and 14 days after pour-on administration of the commercial 5-mg/mL EPM topical product at 1 mg/kg to one group, all animals were necropsied to determine the treatment efficacy based on adult nematode counts. In addition, blood samples were collected in intervals up to 14 days after EPM treatment and plasma was analyzed to determine the EPM plasma concentration profile. Plasma concentrations in the four studies were previously analyzed by non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin® Software (version 5.0 or higher). Presently, a non-parametric ANOVA was used to analyze differences of established PK parameters (Cmax, AUClast) between lactating female goats (Study 1) and combined male castrated goats (Studies 2, 3, and 4). The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Individual percent efficacies per nematode species based on adult nematode counts established 14 days following pour-on EPM treatment at 1-mg/kg bodyweight of the goats were calculated as follows: (1 − [count for EPM-treated goats] / [geometric mean count for the untreated controls]) × 100. A sigmoid Emax model (model 105, where effect C = 0 at 0, C = infinity at Emax) from Phoenix WinNonlin® (build 8.1.0.3530) was used for this current PK-PD analysis using lactating female goat data only (Study 1) and a mixed population of growing male castrated and lactating female goats data (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4) based on the assumption of a direct relationship of plasma exposure (Cmax and AUClast) to pharmacological response (anthelmintic percent efficacy). The sigmoid Emax model used was where Gamma is the the Hill coefficient which describes the slope of the exposure effect curve, C is the exposure (Cmax and AUClast), E is the anthelmintic response, Emax is the maximum anthelmintic efficacy, and EC50 is the exposure producing 50% of Emax. An exposure producing 90% of Emax (EC90) was calculated using the following equation:

Results

The pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUClast were not significantly different between lactating female goats only and combined male castrated goats (p > 0.05). PK-PD analysis of EPM activity was performed by building an exposure–response relationship between EPM exposure data (Cmax, AUClast) from lactating female goats only (Study 1) or pooled lactating female and male castrated goats (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4 combined). PK-PD analysis for male castrated goats only was not performed due to the lack of a sufficient number of individuals showing < 90% anthelmintic efficacy. For lactating female goats only and pooled lactating female and male castrated goats, only the small-intestine nematode T. colubriformis data could be described by the PK-PD model. The sigmoid Emax model was not appropriate to describe the other nematode species data sets as all values were close to Emax. The observed PK and efficacy data for T. colubriformis of the four studies (including pooled studies data) are shown in Table 1, and EPM concentration vs time profiles are presented in Fig. 1 (Study 1 up to day 12; Studies 2, 3, and 4 up to day 14).
Table 1

Summary of PK parameters and efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis of EPM following a single pour-on administration of a topical 5-mg/mL EPM product at 1 mg/kg to lactating female (Study 1) and male castrated growing (Studies 2, 3, and 4) dairy breed goats

Study/studies (number of EPM-treated goats)PK parameters, mean (± SD)1Efficacy (%) against Trichostrongylus colubriformis
Cmax (ng/mL)AUClast (day*ng/mL)Per study2Pooled over studies3
1 (n = 10)5.35 (± 2.27)23.8 (± 9.73)97.0Not applicable
2, 3, 4 (n = 24)4.94 (± 1.73)30.2 (± 9.26)99.6, 98.7, 96.598.3
1, 2, 3, 4 (n = 34)5.06 (± 1.88)28.3 (± 9.72)97.0, 99.6, 98.7, 96.597.6

1Mean and SD of the PK parameters were calculated using individual goat’s values with three significant numbers

2Efficacy (%), per study = 100 × [(C − T)/C], where C is the geometric mean of the individual T. colubriformis counts of the controls and T is the geometric mean of the individual T. colubriformis counts of the EPM-treated goats

3Pooled efficacy (%) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the individual study percentage efficacies

Fig. 1

Mean (± SD) plasma EPM concentration time profiles following a single EPM pour-on administration at 1 mg/kg to lactating female (Study 1; n = 10) and male castrated growing (Studies 2, 3, and 4; n = 8 per study) dairy breed goats (log-linear scale)

Summary of PK parameters and efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis of EPM following a single pour-on administration of a topical 5-mg/mL EPM product at 1 mg/kg to lactating female (Study 1) and male castrated growing (Studies 2, 3, and 4) dairy breed goats 1Mean and SD of the PK parameters were calculated using individual goat’s values with three significant numbers 2Efficacy (%), per study = 100 × [(C − T)/C], where C is the geometric mean of the individual T. colubriformis counts of the controls and T is the geometric mean of the individual T. colubriformis counts of the EPM-treated goats 3Pooled efficacy (%) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the individual study percentage efficacies Mean (± SD) plasma EPM concentration time profiles following a single EPM pour-on administration at 1 mg/kg to lactating female (Study 1; n = 10) and male castrated growing (Studies 2, 3, and 4; n = 8 per study) dairy breed goats (log-linear scale) Results of the PK-PD modeling for EPM treatment vs T. colubriformis efficacy are summarized in Table 2 and modeled exposure response curves are presented in Fig. 2. The Emax was > 92% for T. colubriformis when response relationships were modeled against Cmax and AUClast. The EC50 values obtained by modeling Cmax vs response for T. colubriformis using pooled lactating female and male castrated goat data and lactating female only data were 1.92 and 2.09 ng/mL, respectively. The EC90 values were 2.43 and 3.50 ng/mL, respectively, for the pooled data and the lactating female only data. The AUClast values estimated for 50% efficacy of T. colubriformis using pooled lactating female and male castrated goat data and lactating female only data were 10.9 and 11.5 day*ng/mL, respectively. The AUClast values estimated for 90% efficacy of T. colubriformis were 21.1 and 25.4 day*ng/mL, respectively, for the pooled data and the lactating female only data. Taking the EC90 as the predictor of acceptable efficacy, the observed (calculated) EPM exposure (Cmax and AUClast) from pooled lactating female and male castrated goats met or exceeded the predicted EC90 values. Observed results showed ≥ 96.5% efficacy of the EPM treatment. For lactating female goats only, Cmax met or exceeded the predicted EC90 and AUClast was slightly less than the predicted 90% efficacy level. The observed results showed 97.0% efficacy of the EPM treatment in lactating female goats.
Table 2

PK-PD parameters (EPM Cmax and EPM AUClast vs efficacy relationships) of EPM treatment against Trichostrongylus colubriformis following a single EPM pour-on administration of a topical 5-mg/mL EPM product at 1 mg/kg to a mixed population of growing male castrated and lactating female dairy breed goats (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4; n = 34) and lactating female dairy breed goats only (Study 1; n = 10)

PK-PD parameterGoat population analyzedCmax (ng/mL)AUClast (day*ng/mL)
Emax (%)Pooled lactating female + male castrated growing dairy breed goats92.1 ± 2.8499.6 ± 4.94
Lactating female dairy breed goats92.6 ± 6.95101 ± 13.1
EC50/50% efficacyPooled lactating female + male castrated growing dairy breed goats1.92 ± 0.0910.9 ± 0.83
Lactating female dairy breed goats2.09 ± 0.1711.5 ± 1.77
EC90/90% efficacyPooled lactating female + male castrated growing dairy breed goats2.43 ± 0.1121.1 ± 1.60
Lactating female dairy breed goats ats3.50 ± 0.2925.4 ± 3.89
GammaPooled lactating female + male castrated growing dairy breed goats9.19 ± 3.653.35 ± 0.72
Lactating female dairy breed goats4.26 ± 1.742.78 ± 0.90
Fig. 2

Sigmoid Emax model fit of EPM exposure (EPM Cmax and EPM AUClast) vs efficacy (%) against Trichostrongylus colubriformis in pooled lactating female and male castrated growing dairy breed goats (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4; n = 34): A and B lactating female dairy breed goats only (Study 1; n = 10) and C and D a single EPM pour-on administration at 1 mg/kg (red circles = observed individual experimental data, blue line = fit to sigmoid curve)

PK-PD parameters (EPM Cmax and EPM AUClast vs efficacy relationships) of EPM treatment against Trichostrongylus colubriformis following a single EPM pour-on administration of a topical 5-mg/mL EPM product at 1 mg/kg to a mixed population of growing male castrated and lactating female dairy breed goats (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4; n = 34) and lactating female dairy breed goats only (Study 1; n = 10) Sigmoid Emax model fit of EPM exposure (EPM Cmax and EPM AUClast) vs efficacy (%) against Trichostrongylus colubriformis in pooled lactating female and male castrated growing dairy breed goats (Studies 1, 2, 3, and 4; n = 34): A and B lactating female dairy breed goats only (Study 1; n = 10) and C and D a single EPM pour-on administration at 1 mg/kg (red circles = observed individual experimental data, blue line = fit to sigmoid curve)

Discussion

The objective of this paper was to assess the dose–response of pour-on EPM administered at 1-mg/kg bodyweight against infections with apparently macrocyclic lactone-sensitive gastrointestinal strongylid nematodes in goats. PK-PD analysis is helpful to establish safe and effective dosage regimens of drugs for animals as suboptimal dosing is considered one of the major factors contributing to emergence of resistant pathogens (Toutain 2002; Lanusse et al. 2018). The observed PK results in the four studies retrospectively evaluated indicate that EPM exposure in lactating female goats was comparable to male castrated goats (Fig. 1). Mean PK parameters for both Cmax and AUClast for lactating female goats were comparable to male castrated goats (Table 1). Although to be confirmed in a PK-PD study in female non-lactating dairy breed goats administered pour-on EPM at 1-mg/kg bodyweight, the outcome of the combined analysis of the PK-PD data presented here may indicate that lactating status does not alter the exposure of EPM in dairy goats. In addition to lactation, other factors such as age, bodyweight, body condition, breed, milk production, health status, infection, and geographical conditions may influence the PK profile of drugs (Lespine et al. 2012). The PK-PD modeling presented here demonstrated T. colubriformis as a suitable nematode species for modeling based on lactating female goat data and mixed populations of growing male castrate and lactating female goat data. Due to maximal/near-maximal efficacy against the other species of strongylid nematodes included in the four combined PK-efficacy studies evaluated, their data were not amenable to the sigmoid Emax model. Based on observed and modeled EPM exposure, predicted EC90 values were reached for Cmax in lactating female goats and mixed populations of growing male castrated and lactating female goats, and for AUClast in mixed populations of growing male castrated and lactating female goats. This was in line with the (calculated) pooled efficacy of 97.6%. In lactating female goats, the observed AUClast was similar to the predicted value (23.8 vs 25.4 day*ng/mL) and correlated with the observed EPM efficacy of 97.0%, which indicates that minimum nematocidal drug concentrations were maintained over a sufficient time to achieve the required efficacy as discussed previously (Hamel et al. 2021). Among the strongylid nematodes parasitizing the gastrointestinal tract of domestic ruminants, the species dwelling in the small intestine are the least sensitive to macrocyclic lactones (Egerton et al. 1981; Shoop et al. 1996a). Although not investigated to the extent as done with cattle-specific nematodes, which identified the small-intestine nematodes of the genus Cooperia as dosage-limiting or dosage-discriminating nematodes for macrocyclic lactones (Egerton et al. 1981; Shoop et al. 1996b, 2001; Vercruysse and Rew 2002), there have been titration studies reported which included T. colubriformis, a parasite of the small intestine too. The studies testing parenterally administered compounds of the macrocyclic lactone class showed this parasite as least responsive or less responsive to treatment or exhibiting dosage discriminating properties (Egerton et al. 1981; Shoop et al. 1996b). Thus, historical information as well as recently observed efficacy data of EPM against T. colubriformis show that this species can be used as a predictor of efficacy of other strongylid nematodes of the gastrointestinal tract of domestic ruminants. In summary, the PK-PD analysis of EPM in goats confirms that the dosage of 1 mg/kg EPM administered as a pour-on is sufficient to ensure efficacy against common gastrointestinal strongylid nematodes in both lactating female and male castrated dairy breed goats. A PK-PD relationship was established and indicates that Cmax and AUClast are good predictors of EPM efficacy against T. colubriformis, which can serve as representative for other gastrointestinal strongylid nematodes.
  10 in total

1.  International harmonisation of anthelmintic efficacy guidelines.

Authors:  J Vercruysse; P Holdsworth; T Letonja; D Barth; G Conder; K Hamamoto; K Okano
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 2.738

2.  Titration of subcutaneously administered eprinomectin against mature and immature nematodes in cattle.

Authors:  W Shoop; B Michael; J Egerton; H Mrozik; M Fisher
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.276

3.  Eprinomectin in dairy goats: dose influence on plasma levels and excretion in milk.

Authors:  J Dupuy; C Chartier; J F Sutra; M Alvinerie
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  Strategies to Optimize the Efficacy of Anthelmintic Drugs in Ruminants.

Authors:  Carlos Lanusse; Candela Canton; Guillermo Virkel; Luis Alvarez; Livio Costa-Junior; Adrian Lifschitz
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2018-06-27

Review 5.  Control of helminth ruminant infections by 2030.

Authors:  Jozef Vercruysse; Johannes Charlier; Jan Van Dijk; Eric R Morgan; Tim Geary; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Edwin Claerebout
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Efficacy in sheep and pharmacokinetics in cattle that led to the selection of eprinomectin as a topical endectocide for cattle.

Authors:  W L Shoop; P DeMontigny; D W Fink; J B Williams; J R Egerton; H Mrozik; M H Fisher; B J Skelly; M J Turner
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  Eprinomectin: a novel avermectin for use as a topical endectocide for cattle.

Authors:  W L Shoop; J R Egerton; C H Eary; H W Haines; B F Michael; H Mrozik; P Eskola; M H Fisher; L Slayton; D A Ostlind; B J Skelly; R K Fulton; D Barth; S Costa; L M Gregory; W C Campbell; R L Seward; M J Turner
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.981

8.  Duration of activity of topical eprinomectin against experimental infections with Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in goats.

Authors:  Christophe Chartier; Isabelle Pors
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  Pharmacokinetics and anthelmintic efficacy of topical eprinomectin in goats prevented from grooming.

Authors:  Steffen Rehbein; Michael Kellermann; Teresa A Wehner
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Eprinomectin pour-on (EPRINEX® Pour-on, Merial): efficacy against gastrointestinal and pulmonary nematodes and pharmacokinetics in sheep.

Authors:  Dietmar Hamel; Antonio Bosco; Laura Rinaldi; Giuseppe Cringoli; Karl-Heinz Kaulfuß; Michael Kellermann; James Fischer; Hailun Wang; Katrin Kley; Sandra Mayr; Renate Rauh; Martin Visser; Thea Wiefel; Becky Fankhauser; Steffen Rehbein
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.741

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.