Literature DB >> 35277750

Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Determining Sagittal Spinal Curvatures Using Deep Learning and Radiography.

Hyo Min Lee1, Young Jae Kim1, Je Bok Cho2, Ji Young Jeon3, Kwang Gi Kim4,5.   

Abstract

Analyzing spinal curvatures manually is time-consuming and tedious for clinicians, and intra-observer and inter-observer variability can affect manual measurements. In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of an automated deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tool for measuring the sagittal alignment of the spine from X-ray images. The CAD system proposed here performs two functions: deep learning-based lateral spine segmentation and automatic analysis of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles. We utilized 322 datasets with data augmentation for learning and fivefold cross-validation. The segmentation model was based on U-Net, which has multiple applications in medical image processing. Here, we utilized parameter equations and trigonometric functions to design spinal angle measurement algorithms. The kyphosis (T4-T12) and lordosis angle (L1-S1, L1-L5) were automatically measured to help diagnose kyphosis and lordosis. The segmentation model had precision, sensitivity, and dice similarity coefficient values of 90.53 ± 4.61%, 89.53 ± 1.8%, and 90.22 ± 0.62%, respectively. The performance of the CAD algorithm was also verified with the Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. The proposed angle measurement algorithm exhibited high similarity and reliability during verification. Therefore, CAD can help clinicians in reaching a diagnosis by analyzing the sagittal spinal curvatures while reducing observer-based variability and the required time or effort.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis; Deep learning; Lumbar lordosis; Segmentation; Thoracic kyphosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35277750      PMCID: PMC9485333          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00592-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  33 in total

1.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Generation of a finite element model of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  M A Tyndyka; V Barron; P E McHugh; D O'Mahoney
Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.073

Review 3.  Biomechanics of the spine. Part I: spinal stability.

Authors:  Roberto Izzo; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Mario Muto
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Cobb Angle-Vertebral Rotation Angle-Spinous Process Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Amanda C Y Chan; Devlin G Morrison; Duc V Nguyen; Douglas L Hill; Eric Parent; Edmond H M Lou
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2014-05-08

6.  Automatic Lumbar Spine Tracking Based on Siamese Convolutional Network.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Xiubao Sui; Chengwei Liu; Xiaodong Kuang; Yong Hu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles.

Authors:  A M Briggs; T V Wrigley; E A Tully; P E Adams; A M Greig; K L Bennell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis.

Authors:  D E Harrison; R Cailliet; D D Harrison; T J Janik; B Holland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science.

Authors:  Matthew McCormick; Xiaoxiao Liu; Julien Jomier; Charles Marion; Luis Ibanez
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume.

Authors:  Vijay M Ravindra; Steven S Senglaub; Abbas Rattani; Michael C Dewan; Roger Härtl; Erica Bisson; Kee B Park; Mark G Shrime
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.