Literature DB >> 35277434

Mass Transport in High-Flux Hemodialysis: Application of Engineering Principles to Clinical Prescription.

Farzad Mohajerani1, William R Clark1, Claudio Ronco2,3,4, Vivek Narsimhan5.   

Abstract

An understanding of the processes underlying mass transfer is paramount for the attainment of adequate solute removal in the dialytic treatment of patients with kidney failure. In this review, engineering principles are applied to characterize the physical mechanisms behind the two major modes of mass transfer during hemodialysis, namely diffusion and convection. The manner in which flow rate, dialyzer geometry, and membrane microstructure affect these processes is discussed, with concepts such as boundary layers, effective membrane diffusivity, and sieving coefficients highlighted as critical considerations. The objective is to improve clinicians' understanding of these concepts as important factors influencing the prescription and delivery of hemodialysis therapy.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  convection; diffusion; hemodialysis; mass transfer; membrane; ultrafiltration; uremic toxin

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35277434      PMCID: PMC9269577          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.09410721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   10.614


  37 in total

Review 1.  Low-molecular weight proteins in end-stage renal disease: potential toxicity and dialytic removal mechanisms.

Authors:  William R Clark; Dayong Gao
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Clinical Issues.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 3.  Solute removal by hollow-fiber dialyzers.

Authors:  William R Clark; Eduardo Rocha; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Contrib Nephrol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.580

4.  Online haemodiafiltration: definition, dose quantification and safety revisited.

Authors:  James E Tattersall; Richard A Ward
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score.

Authors:  Francisco Maduell; Lida Rodas; José Jesús Broseta; Miquel Gomez; Marc Xipell; Elena Guillen; Enrique Montagud-Marrahi; Marta Arias-Guillén; Néstor Fontseré; Manel Vera; Nayra Rico
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 6.  Uremic Toxins and their Relation to Dialysis Efficacy.

Authors:  William R Clark; Nader Laal Dehghani; Vivek Narsimhan; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 7.  Haemodialysis membranes.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco; William R Clark
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 28.314

8.  Classification of Uremic Toxins and Their Role in Kidney Failure.

Authors:  Mitchell H Rosner; Thiago Reis; Faeq Husain-Syed; Raymond Vanholder; Colin Hutchison; Peter Stenvinkel; Peter J Blankestijn; Mario Cozzolino; Laurent Juillard; Kianoush Kashani; Manish Kaushik; Hideki Kawanishi; Ziad Massy; Tammy Lisa Sirich; Li Zuo; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Morphological Characterization of the Polyflux 210H Hemodialysis Filter Pores.

Authors:  A Hedayat; J Szpunar; N A P Kiran Kumar; R Peace; H Elmoselhi; A Shoker
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-06

10.  MCO Membranes: Enhanced Selectivity in High-Flux Class.

Authors:  Adriana Boschetti-de-Fierro; Manuel Voigt; Markus Storr; Bernd Krause
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.