| Literature DB >> 35277126 |
Yo-Ichi Suzuki1, Kazumoto Shibuya2, Sonoko Misawa1, Tomoki Suichi1, Atsuko Tsuneyama1, Yuta Kojima1, Keigo Nakamura1, Hiroki Kano1, Mario Prado1, Satoshi Kuwabara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Exercise; Fasciculation; Handedness; Ultrasonography
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35277126 PMCID: PMC8915448 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02617-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1Detection of fasciculation in the hole body. Graph shows the rate of detected fasciculation. Black graph shows right side and gray shows left side. Side difference did not show in each the muscle
Fasciculation intensity in the whole body of patients with ALS
| Side | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | ||
| Fasciculation score | |||
| Tongue | 0 (0 - 2) | N/A | |
| Biceps brachii | 3 (2 - 3) | 3 (1 - 3) | 0.10 |
| 1st dosal interosseous | 2 (0 - 3) | 1.5 (0 - 3) | 0.016 |
| Paraspinalis | 0 (0 - 1.25) | 0 (0 - 2) | 0.99 |
| Vastus lateralis | 1 (0 - 3) | 1.5 (0 - 3) | 0.97 |
| Tbialis anterior | 2.5 (1 - 3) | 3 (0 - 3) | 0.85 |
Fasciculation score was defined as follows; 0 = No fasciculation, 1 = Intermittent fasciculation in the one part, 2 = Intermittent fasciculation in two or more parts, 3 = Sustainable fasciculation in two or more parts
Data are given as median (IQR)
Fig. 2Differences in the fasciculation intensity in the hole body. Graph shows the rate of fasciculation intensity in the hole body. The fasciculation intensity in the right FDI was significantly greater than the left FDI (p = 0.016)
Fasciculation intensity depending on onset sites
| Side | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | ||
| Fasciculation score | |||
| Bulbar onset ( | |||
| Tongue | 0 (0 - 2) | N/A | |
| Biceps brachii | 3 (1 - 3) | 3 (1 - 3) | 0.14 |
| 1st dosal interosseous | 2 (0 - 3) | 2 (0 - 3) | 0.78 |
| Paraspinalis | 0 (0 - 1) | 0 (0 - 1) | 0.77 |
| Vastus lateralis | 1 (0 - 2) | 1 (0 - 2) | 0.094 |
| Tbialis anterior | 2 (1 - 3) | 3 (1 - 3) | 0.51 |
| U/E onset ( | |||
| Tongue | 1 (0 - 2) | N/A | |
| Biceps brachii | 3 (2 - 3) | 3 (2 - 3) | 0.27 |
| 1st dosal interosseous | 3 (0.5 - 3) | 1 (0 - 3) | 0.022 |
| Paraspinalis | 0 (0 - 2) | 0 (0 - 2) | 0.77 |
| Vastus lateralis | 1 (0 - 3) | 2 (0 - 3) | 0.21 |
| Tbialis anterior | 2 (1 - 3) | 2 (0.5 - 3) | 0.69 |
| L/E onset ( | |||
| Tongue | 0 (0 - 1.25) | N/A | |
| Biceps brachii | 3 (2 - 3) | 2.5 (0.75 - 3) | 0.018 |
| 1st dosal interosseous | 2 (1 - 3) | 1.5 (0 - 3) | 0.11 |
| Paraspinalis | 0.5 (0 - 2.25) | 0 (0 - 3) | 1.00 |
| Vastus lateralis | 2 (0 - 3) | 2 (0 - 3) | 0.83 |
| Tbialis anterior | 2.5 (0.75 - 3) | 2 (0 - 3) | 0.57 |
Data of fasciculation score are given as median (IQR)
U/E Upper extremities, L/E Lower extremities
Fig. 3Differences in the fasciculation intensity based on handedness. Graph shows the rate of fasciculation intensity based on handedness. The fasciculation intensity in the dominant FDI was significantly greater than the non-dominant FDI (p = 0.025) (A). In contrast, fasciculation intensity in the dominant biceps was also greater than non-dominant biceps but the difference did not reach the statistically significant (B)